I
ImQuiet
Guest
Or maybe I’m just messing with you.
Wasn’t that expressed in Gaudium et spes? Now, what was the Latin for Mexican standoff again…The Mexican standoff approach is futile.
An anonymous forum about religion is no place to mess around.Or maybe I’m just messing with you.
And I can guess 2 specific Cardinals you want to hear from as well as on auxiliary Bishop.Thank you for this.
Yes, can we post links to the reactions of cardinals and bishops if we find them. I care more about their responses to this than media personalities and even Catholic apologists.
The pope and church isn’t meant to bring God into our world or "their world. It’s supposed to bring us to God.BigBoom:![]()
The Mexican standoff approach is futile. The Church adopted the title of Pontiff meaning “bridge builder” from the Roman Pagans, who had a ‘college of pontiffs’ to build a bridge between their deities and the people. The idea of meeting people where they are at isn’t justifying them in their sin. It’s bringing God right into their world. For many years the Church struggled with how to serve Christians in China by the Mexican standoff but its become prudent to build a bridge and meet them where they are at.meltzerboy2:![]()
Because he’s justifying people in their sin, not leading them away from it.Why do you believe Pope Francis is leading people away from Christ? It seems to me he is doing just the opposite by showing that the Church cares for and loves all, because all people are children of G-d, as the Pope said. Wouldn’t more people be attracted to the Church because of such beliefs?
Why drag “Trump” into a forum thread having to do with Pope Francis and his opinion on “civil unions”?the same bunch who rewards Trump’s lies and incompetence with blind loyalty I might add.
He gave his opinion on civil unions AND Donald Trump. The latter hasn’t generated much discussion on this particular board. At least for now.Why drag “Trump” into a forum thread having to do with Pope Francis and his opinion on “civil unions”?
Is he? Yes, he does say a lot of things that those on the far right disagree with. But that does not mean he is misspeaking. It’s no secret that he harbors little sympathy for the far right.But he’s always stepping in it. He’s always putting his foot in his mouth.
Where did you get that bizarre idea from? Not from anything I wrote.Are you saying the Church’s teachings are far right?
I thought this deserved its own thread. So it appears the part about people having a right to a family was unrelated to civil unions. This is all from a 2019 interview. The “right to a family” part was about not disowning your kids and he is clear about the morality of same-sex acts. The endorsement for civil unions for legal protections is not in the transcript, but might be from the same interview. Not sure if true, but I read that comment was in relation to Argentina when he opposed same …
He has spoken out against the wall builders, laissez-faire capitalism, climate change denial, mass deportation of refugees etc. He is very much espousing Church teaching in the face of far right political positions.Harbors little sympathy for the far right? And how do you know that? Are you saying the Church’s teachings are far right?
Perhaps he might have mentioned in passing that while sensitive to the need for a legal framework for persons of the same sex who wish to live as “family”, the church does not endorse a sexual relationship between such persons.If the article is true, it’s a sign of the Holy Father’s humanity and pastoral wisdom. It only increases my admiration for him.
there is only one Jesus, one savior,Because we ALL share the same tiny blue dot in this infinite universe, we’re all human and we all have different beliefs that need to be respected and heard.