Pope Francis criticizes Trump's 'zero-tolerance' migrant policy

  • Thread starter Thread starter PoliticoIAm
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
taken in based on sponsorship.
This is one area which the US government can move on. One of the biggest complaints is the high cost of supporting refugees and whether its proper for a secular state to pony up for it.

If sponsors could be recruited to provide housing, food, medical care for the refugees until they get on their feet and have been here in America for 10 years if necessary.
 
Well, yeah, it’s not up to the individual countries if they are part of the EU. Thus, Brexit.
 
Have you ever read about “dignity cultures” vs “honor cultures” vs “face cultures”? It’s an interesting concept. Our American culture is generally considered a “dignity culture”, and generally immigrants are from an “honor culture”, except for Asians, who are classed as “face culture”.
 
I agree with you.
Gal 6 : 10 especially to those who belong to the family of believers.
Aka not muslims.

Btw if im not mistaken, this rules abt childreb being separated from their parents is democrat’s.
 
Gal 6 : 10 especially to those who belong to the family of believers.
Aka not muslims.
Exactly. It is natural and right that we should take care of our family (i.e. those in the Church) and ensure its survival. If the Faith is to survive in Europe and America, steps must be taken to ensure that it is not dispossessed by an alien culture and religion.

I also believe that any and all migrants to a Europe or America must be prepared to adopt the culture and traditions of their new homes. If a Muslim wishes to migrate to America, he must be prepared to adopt American values. If a Muslim does not want to adopt American values, he should not migrate to America.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like islamophobia to me by your posts.
You wish to find a label for me. You tried unsuccessfully to call me a racist earlier. Now you’re trying to call me an islamophobe. You took issue because I said America should limit non-European immigration and now you wish to call me names. I’m not engaging you in conversation so don’t expect any further replies from me.
 
Since the establishment of an immigration policy called the “Flores Settlement” in 1997, our laws have prevented children illegally crossing our border from being held in detention centers for more than 20 days. With the surge in those claiming asylum, the backlog of cases became impossible to resolve within 20 days. So the Obama administration decided to release the parents and children into the United States, pending a future court hearing (a practice commonly called “catch and release.”) Yet … according to the Heritage Foundation, 95% of asylum claimants never show up to their court hearing. And according to reports, as many as 80% of asylum claims are denied as illegitimate.

The Trump Administration decided instead to hold all adult illegal migrants in custody to prevent asylum claimants from fleeing. But, still bound by the Flores settlement, the Administration was forced to separate children after 20 days to the Department of Health and Human Services to find them a responsible guardian (with preference for relatives).

Why the surge in those illegally crossing the border and claiming assylum (remember, the separation policy did not apply to those entering the country legally)? Just pause to think about this statistic: a 314% increase in adults showing up with kids that are not a family unit. Those are traffickers. Those are smugglers. That is MS-13. They are criminals. They are abusers. Stop the magnet!
 
As a noneuropean immigrant to the us, did you really think I wouldn’t take offense to you mentioning the immigration of my kind is less preferable to Europeans?
 
It’s time we just annex these countries and rule over them since they’ve proven they are incapable of providing a livable country.
Not a bad idea. We could make more states, even. Then we wouldn’t have such overpopulation in the “old” US.

However, we would then be taking on their debt as well.
 
Last edited:
Tell it to people like St. Teresa of Calcutta.

The Catholic Church does more around the world every single day in working to solve people’s problems than any other organization ever known.

It’s a baseless criticism to argue that the Church needs to come up with solutions when it calls out politicians for not ethically, morally, and honorably doing their jobs.
 
I said America should limit non-European immigration
Why?

Supposedly, St Patrick’s Cathedral in NYC was built with the windows high on the walls to make them less susceptible to being broken by rocks thrown by anti-Catholics.
 
Last edited:
If either Ryan or Trump contribute to dismantling Medicare or Social Security to any great extent, there will be an outcry in this country such as NEVER been seen before. Go ahead, Mr. Ryan, make my day…
 
This sounds like the SAME cry against earlier immigration, which was LEGAL. We don’t want peasant Russian Jews in our country, nor do we want vulgar Italians or poor Irish. They won’t be able to adapt to the Anglo-Saxon Germanic culture of the U.S. They won’t learn the language, they’ll bring their weird cultures, they’ll ruin the educational system if we let them in it, they’ll take our jobs, they’ll disrupt the social order, and so on. How does such thinking about Muslims differ?
 
Christ does not tell us to follow a moral criterion of “Do what they do to you.” Rather, it’s “Love your neighbor as yourself.” And love your enemy. If they don’t like us, that’s to their demise. YOU as a Christian are CALLED TO LOVE all people, regardless.
True, and yet the CCC lays out provisions for a just war!
 
This sounds like the SAME cry against earlier immigration, which was LEGAL.
That’s not exactly true, at the turn of the 20th Century, American industry needed a lot of men with strong backs to dig coal and work in industry and actively recruited immigrants to fill all the entry level positions.
 
I think they’d need to spend a good amount of time as territories first. They’ve proven incapable of self governance.
 
My comment is that the Pope should stick to commenting on topics on which he is infallible beyond any reasonable doubt.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top