Pope John Paul II 'whipped himself to feel closer to God'

  • Thread starter Thread starter KC91
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m not going to knock the Pope but I don’t understand it. Your posts have been of some help to me in understanding this matter.

To each his own. I don’t much care for self-discipline so I don’t need to whip myself, my struggles are more basic.
Cosmian,

I don’t think JPII self -flagellated in order to feel closer to Christ BUT because he felt close to Christ. In my mind there is a difference. I hope this make sense He didn’t need to whip himself to feel closer, but whipped himself because he was close to His Lord. That’s , at least, how I understand it.
 
Where is there real documentation, where it leads to say that Pope John Paul II did this self punishment of “wipping himself” for a penance? Sleeping on the floor I can believe but the Catholic Church stopped self-flagellation? Or am I wrong here and there is nothing wrong with self-flagellation??? Because if so maybe this is a practice I need to begin and with Lent coming right around the corner and all.

Is there a book that PJP II wrote that he himself said he did this? Or is this coming out because he is in the process of becoming a saint?
This information was gathered by the Postulator for the Cause of Canonization and was included in the report that was sent to the Holy Father. The committee’s job is to gather all evidence that the canidate has led a heroic life of Christian virtue. It reads everything that the candidate wrote: letters, diaries, spiritual journals, and any other documents that pertain to his life of faith. The committee also takes testimonies from eye-witnesses who knew the man. According to the committee, these flagealtions were reported by witnesses whose credibility is beyond reproach. Therefore, the committe accepts them a truth and includes them in their findings of heroic virtue.

These reports did not come out after John Paul II was declared venerable. They came out during the process of investigation. But they coiuld not be made public until the process is over. Now that the investigation is over and the case is closed, the findings can be shared. Nothing new can be added to their findings at this point. Once the pope declares a person venerable, there is no further study on the person’s life. The next step is to study the alleged miracles. That’s where things are at now. They are studying a reported miracle of a nun cured of Parkinson’s through the intercession of John Paul II. If the miracle is proven true, then beatification follows. If there are two miracles proven true, canonization follows.

One thing that we have to keep in mind is that Pope Benedict waved the waiting period to begin the study of John Paul’s life. He can also wave the requirement for the miracles and beatify and canonize based on the report of a heroic virtuous life. In reality, that’s all you need for sanctity. The miracles are a supernatural confirmation. But such a confirmation is not needed, because canonization is an infallible decree made by a pope. The pope does not need miracles to exercise infallibility.

On another subject, the Church has never done away with the Discipline. The Discipline, as it is properly called, is still practiced by many people, esepcially in certain religious orders. The Church does not encourage it without the supervision of a spiritual director. The spiritual director need not be a priest. But it must be someone who is trained in the spiritual life. You always need an objective person who can guide you to ensure that you are not carried away. It is equally important to have someone guide you, because it can be a horrible practice in the hands of someone who has some psychological problems such as scrupulosity or a tendency to inflict self-injury. That is not the purpose of the Discipline.

The purpose of the Discipline is exactly what the word says, to discipline the mind and body, not to punish or do harm. Of course, we can all do harm to the body without meaning to do so. This can happen even through fasting and abstinence. There is a degree that is an overkill, for lack of a better term. An overkill is when the health of the person is compromised in an irresponsible manner. Irresponsible would be when a person has full knowledge that a penitential practice aggravates a health problem and proceeds. That is immoral.

That being said, there have been holy souls who have become sick as a result of penances. But they had no idea that the penances were the cause of their poor health. In those cases there is no culpability.

Finally, these penitential practices are often an aid to help the person feel closer to Christ crucified. The soul yearns to identify with the physical sufferings of Christ. This yearning comes from the soul’s love for Christ. In reality, this person is already very close to Christ. To paraphrase St. Augustine, to look for Christ is to have found him. An excellent example of this kind of love is the prayer of St. Francis of Assisi. “Lord grant that I may experience in my flesh the sufferings of the cross and that I may love you as you loved me from the cross.” This is what the early Christians called Agape love. The soul identifies with Christ to the point that it seeks to become physically united to him.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
This information was gathered by the Postulator for the Cause of Canonization and was included in the report that was sent to the Holy Father. The committee’s job is to gather all evidence that the canidate has led a heroic life of Christian virtue. It reads everything that the candidate wrote: letters, diaries, spiritual journals, and any other documents that pertain to his life of faith. The committee also takes testimonies from eye-witnesses who knew the man. According to the committee, these flagealtions were reported by witnesses whose credibility is beyond reproach. Therefore, the committe accepts them a truth and includes them in their findings of heroic virtue.

These reports did not come out after John Paul II was declared venerable. They came out during the process of investigation. But they coiuld not be made public until the process is over. Now that the investigation is over and the case is closed, the findings can be shared. Nothing new can be added to their findings at this point. Once the pope declares a person venerable, there is no further study on the person’s life. The next step is to study the alleged miracles. That’s where things are at now. They are studying a reported miracle of a nun cured of Parkinson’s through the intercession of John Paul II. If the miracle is proven true, then beatification follows. If there are two miracles proven true, canonization follows.

One thing that we have to keep in mind is that Pope Benedict waved the waiting period to begin the study of John Paul’s life. He can also wave the requirement for the miracles and beatify and canonize based on the report of a heroic virtuous life. In reality, that’s all you need for sanctity. The miracles are a supernatural confirmation. But such a confirmation is not needed, because canonization is an infallible decree made by a pope. The pope does not need miracles to exercise infallibility.

On another subject, the Church has never done away with the Discipline. The Discipline, as it is properly called, is still practiced by many people, esepcially in certain religious orders. The Church does not encourage it without the supervision of a spiritual director. The spiritual director need not be a priest. But it must be someone who is trained in the spiritual life. You always need an objective person who can guide you to ensure that you are not carried away. It is equally important to have someone guide you, because it can be a horrible practice in the hands of someone who has some psychological problems such as scrupulosity or a tendency to inflict self-injury. That is not the purpose of the Discipline.

The purpose of the Discipline is exactly what the word says, to discipline the mind and body, not to punish or do harm. Of course, we can all do harm to the body without meaning to do so. This can happen even through fasting and abstinence. There is a degree that is an overkill, for lack of a better term. An overkill is when the health of the person is compromised in an irresponsible manner. Irresponsible would be when a person has full knowledge that a penitential practice aggravates a health problem and proceeds. That is immoral.

That being said, there have been holy souls who have become sick as a result of penances. But they had no idea that the penances were the cause of their poor health. In those cases there is no culpability.

Finally, these penitential practices are often an aid to help the person feel closer to Christ crucified. The soul yearns to identify with the physical sufferings of Christ. This yearning comes from the soul’s love for Christ. In reality, this person is already very close to Christ. To paraphrase St. Augustine, to look for Christ is to have found him. An excellent example of this kind of love is the prayer of St. Francis of Assisi. “Lord grant that I may experience in my flesh the sufferings of the cross and that I may love you as you loved me from the cross.” This is what the early Christians called Agape love. The soul identifies with Christ to the point that it seeks to become physically united to him.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
Br. JR,
the last paragraph in your post has really helped me with understanding the title of this thread, particularly … " these penetential practices are often an aid to help the person feel closer to Christ crucified . … In reality, this person is already very close to Christ. … The soul identifies with Christ to the point that it seeks to become physically united to him. "
I think you mean then, that it is not enough at a certain point for certain individuals to feel only spiritually united to Christ and that the self-inflicted penance helps with the human need to bodily share in Christ’s suffering on the cross . I hope I have understood it sufficiently.
 
Br. JR,
the last paragraph in your post has really helped me with understanding the title of this thread, particularly … " these penetential practices are often an aid to help the person feel closer to Christ crucified . … In reality, this person is already very close to Christ. … The soul identifies with Christ to the point that it seeks to become physically united to him. "
I think you mean then, that it is not enough at a certain point for certain individuals to feel only spiritually united to Christ and that the self-inflicted penance helps with the human need to bodily share in Christ’s suffering on the cross . I hope I have understood it sufficiently.
Yes. The height of spiritual conformation to Christ is physical conformation. Very few people have acheived it. It is a gift of grace for which man can ask, but God only grants to certain souls. I noticed that you’re a Franciscan. You have a good example in our Holy Father Francis. In his sermons, Bonaventure tells us that Francis has become so much like Christ at the level of virtue that the only thing left was for a physical transformation. Thus in September 1224, after the Feast of the Exultation of the Holy Cross, Francis prays for the gift to experience the cross in his own body. The grace was granted to him several days later through the stigmata.

Many holy men and women reach a level of identification with Christ that they aspire to experience his suffering as well as his love.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Thanks again Br. JR and especially for the reference to St Francis 's own desire to not only be close to his God spiritually but also to experience those same sufferings himself in order to draw even closer to Him. Got it !😃
 
Where is there real documentation, where it leads to say that Pope John Paul II did this self punishment of “wipping himself” for a penance? Sleeping on the floor I can believe but the Catholic Church stopped self-flagellation? Or am I wrong here and there is nothing wrong with self-flagellation??? Because if so maybe this is a practice I need to begin and with Lent coming right around the corner and all.

Is there a book that PJP II wrote that he himself said he did this? Or is this coming out because he is in the process of becoming a saint?
No the Church has never stopped the practice.

However, it is an extraordinary penance. And, as with all extraordinary penitential practices, MUST not be done without discussing it with your spiritual director or confessor. To do so without any guidance opens a person to moral harm, like running a marathon without your doctor checking you out can result in physical harm.
 
This information was gathered by the Postulator for the Cause of Canonization and was included in the report that was sent to the Holy Father. The committee’s job is to gather all evidence that the canidate has led a heroic life of Christian virtue. It reads everything that the candidate wrote: letters, diaries, spiritual journals, and any other documents that pertain to his life of faith. The committee also takes testimonies from eye-witnesses who knew the man. According to the committee, these flagealtions were reported by witnesses whose credibility is beyond reproach. Therefore, the committe accepts them a truth and includes them in their findings of heroic virtue.

These reports did not come out after John Paul II was declared venerable. They came out during the process of investigation. But they coiuld not be made public until the process is over. Now that the investigation is over and the case is closed, the findings can be shared. Nothing new can be added to their findings at this point. Once the pope declares a person venerable, there is no further study on the person’s life. The next step is to study the alleged miracles. That’s where things are at now. They are studying a reported miracle of a nun cured of Parkinson’s through the intercession of John Paul II. If the miracle is proven true, then beatification follows. If there are two miracles proven true, canonization follows.

One thing that we have to keep in mind is that Pope Benedict waved the waiting period to begin the study of John Paul’s life. He can also wave the requirement for the miracles and beatify and canonize based on the report of a heroic virtuous life. In reality, that’s all you need for sanctity. The miracles are a supernatural confirmation. But such a confirmation is not needed, because canonization is an infallible decree made by a pope. The pope does not need miracles to exercise infallibility.

On another subject, the Church has never done away with the Discipline. The Discipline, as it is properly called, is still practiced by many people, esepcially in certain religious orders. The Church does not encourage it without the supervision of a spiritual director. The spiritual director need not be a priest. But it must be someone who is trained in the spiritual life. You always need an objective person who can guide you to ensure that you are not carried away. It is equally important to have someone guide you, because it can be a horrible practice in the hands of someone who has some psychological problems such as scrupulosity or a tendency to inflict self-injury. That is not the purpose of the Discipline.

The purpose of the Discipline is exactly what the word says, to discipline the mind and body, not to punish or do harm. Of course, we can all do harm to the body without meaning to do so. This can happen even through fasting and abstinence. There is a degree that is an overkill, for lack of a better term. An overkill is when the health of the person is compromised in an irresponsible manner. Irresponsible would be when a person has full knowledge that a penitential practice aggravates a health problem and proceeds. That is immoral.

That being said, there have been holy souls who have become sick as a result of penances. But they had no idea that the penances were the cause of their poor health. In those cases there is no culpability.

Finally, these penitential practices are often an aid to help the person feel closer to Christ crucified. The soul yearns to identify with the physical sufferings of Christ. This yearning comes from the soul’s love for Christ. In reality, this person is already very close to Christ. To paraphrase St. Augustine, to look for Christ is to have found him. An excellent example of this kind of love is the prayer of St. Francis of Assisi. “Lord grant that I may experience in my flesh the sufferings of the cross and that I may love you as you loved me from the cross.” This is what the early Christians called Agape love. The soul identifies with Christ to the point that it seeks to become physically united to him.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
Br. JR,

Thank you so much for clearing this up for me. It makes sense to me now. I guess I am not sure who I had gotten my previous information, where I said I thought self-flagellation was no longer a practice of the Church and or forbidden by the Church.

Thanks,

Katie
 
Humility is one thing humans will always struggle with, be it pumping ourselves up or thinking we are the worst of the worst. I cannot begin to imagine what struggles someone who is called to be The Vicar of Christ must deal with on an hourly basis. Pope John Paul II did this mortification without public knowledge,
as all penance should be practiced; his Spiritual director was Christ.
In this current age of me first & no suffering required it’s little wonder the secular world fails to grasp the concept of mortification; it thinks nothing of lauding athletics who punish their bodies on a daily basis for a trophy. The Super Bowl will be played today and I guarantee the players will face more agony than this Saint ever did.
 
Brother JR,

Can you describe “victim soul” ? Would this be the same as someone engaging in penitential acts or is it only about asking for and accepting God given suffering?

Thanks.
 
Brother JR,

Can you describe “victim soul” ? Would this be the same as someone engaging in penitential acts or is it only about asking for and accepting God given suffering?

Thanks.
A victim soul is a person who has been given the grace of offering their natural suffering for the salvation of souls. For example, there are people who have terminal illnesses or who have other physical conditions that they bear for the salvation of others. It does not mean that the victim soul does not seek medical assistance or relief from pain and suffering. It’s an attitude. One accepts one’s condition as an opportunity for great love.

A good example of a victim soul was John Paul II. When he became so ill that he could barely function, he accepted his condition for the salvation of the Church. Another good example was St. Clare of Assisi. She spent almost 40 years in bed. She was very sick. But she offered up her sickness as part of her poverty. There is Pierre Giorgio Frassati who suffered quietly and with great joy.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
I always have a hard time thinking God has any appreciation whatsoever for those kinds of actions.
 
I always have a hard time thinking God has any appreciation whatsoever for those kinds of actions.
It’s not a matter of what we think God appreciates. It’s a matter of what has been revealed to us through Sacred Tradition. We don’t always understand the reasons behind God’s thinking. But we don’t have to understand. Reason must be enlightened by faith. Our faith tells us that these penitential practices were espoused and promoted by the early Christians as revealed to them by the Apostles.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
A victim soul is a person who has been given the grace of offering their natural suffering for the salvation of souls. For example, there are people who have terminal illnesses or who have other physical conditions that they bear for the salvation of others. It does not mean that the victim soul does not seek medical assistance or relief from pain and suffering. It’s an attitude. One accepts one’s condition as an opportunity for great love.

A good example of a victim soul was John Paul II. When he became so ill that he could barely function, he accepted his condition for the salvation of the Church. Another good example was St. Clare of Assisi. She spent almost 40 years in bed. She was very sick. But she offered up her sickness as part of her poverty. There is Pierre Giorgio Frassati who suffered quietly and with great joy.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
Thanks!
 
It’s not a matter of what we think God appreciates. It’s a matter of what has been revealed to us through Sacred Tradition. We don’t always understand the reasons behind God’s thinking. But we don’t have to understand. Reason must be enlightened by faith. Our faith tells us that these penitential practices were espoused and promoted by the early Christians as revealed to them by the Apostles.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
Thanks for that answer JR… Who here can judge someones method of becoming closer to Christ?

I cant help but to think of St. Catherine of Sienna, who “pursued her vocation full bore. She whipped herself thrice daily, wore a chain around her waist that cut into her skin, confined her diet to raw vegetables and water, and deprived herself of sleep to the point where she slept only half an hour every other day.”
(quote taken from “This Rock” catholic apologetics and evangelization July-August 2009)

These are the kind of penances that only a Saint can withstand. This is true devotion!
 
Even the very young Children at Fatima wore tightly tied ropes around them for penance…They even slept with them on until the Blessed Mother ,or a priest, depending on who you ask told them they must not sleep in the ropes…They were only little kids but they still felt the need to do physical penance
 
There is one thing that must be made claer. People have engaged in many practices that were not healthy for them, nor necessary to achieve holiness. These are discouraged by spiritual directors and pastoral counselors. It’s not a free for all. We don’t just go out and begin to punish our bodies without restraint. There is no discipline in that. The virtue to be achieved is discipline, hence the name of the practice. Discipline comes from temperance. Too much of a penitential activity is as bad as not enough. Therefore, no one should engage in extraordinary penitential practices without the aid of a spiritual director. Even John Paul II had a spiritual director. I’m not sure who they were during his life, But during his years as a pope the official spiritual director of the Papal Household has always been a Capuchin Franciscan Friar. The Capuchins are noted for their careful balance between asceticism and charity.

The point is that any spiritual exercise has to be balanced. Charity may not be violated for the sake of discipline. Discipline without charity is not discipline. It’s abuse.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
We kow Christ did go without food for 40 days…I am not sure if he drank water, but we know he didn’t eat and he was in the desert

We all imitate this to a lesser extent when we fast and abstain during Lent…however young children and the elderly are not required to fast, only to abstain from meat, and anyone that is ill needn’t fast either…I suppose pregnant women and nursing mothers are excused
 
We kow Christ did go without food for 40 days…I am not sure if he drank water, but we know he didn’t eat and he was in the desert

We all imitate this to a lesser extent when we fast and abstain during Lent…however young children and the elderly are not required to fast, only to abstain from meat, and anyone that is ill needn’t fast either…I suppose pregnant women and nursing mothers are excused
Jesus’ fast was not an uncommon event. The Jews had this practice for thousands of years before Christ was born. In the OT we read about David doing penance fasting and wearing sack cloth and ashes. At the time, Jesus’ sojourn in the desert was not seen as anything extraordinary for an orthodox Jew.

What is very important here is that Jesus balances out the laws of disicipline. We see him fasting the in the desert and later we see his disciples picking food on the Sabaath, when they should not have been doing so. We hear Jesus say, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath.” Jesus strikes the balance that was missing from the Jewish practices, but he did not abolish them. Later he encourages fasting and prayer as the way to exorcise demons.

The point here is that Jesus teaches us the true meaning of discipline.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
How true… Penance during Lent for me is a must! But outside of that, if I felt a further need for penance, I would definitely need to talk with a priest about it…

Besides, since I’m not clergy -I’ll probably never be spiritually inclined to do such highly disciplined forms of penance. :coolinoff: At least I hope! 😃
 
How true… Penance during Lent for me is a must! But outside of that, if I felt a further need for penance, I would definitely need to talk with a priest about it…

Besides, since I’m not clergy -I’ll probably never be spiritually inclined to do such highly disciplined forms of penance. :coolinoff: At least I hope! 😃
You don’t have to be clergy. St. Catherine of Siena was not a religious. She was a Lay Dominican. St. Thomas More and St. Joan of Arc were Secular Franciscans. St. Francis of Assisi was a lay brother and the list goes on.

I’m not saying that you have to use the discipline. I’m just dimistifying it. It’s not for the clergy. Actually, it has its roots in monastic life, which is lay not clerical.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top