Pope suggests Trump: not Christian

  • Thread starter Thread starter ringil
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Go ahead and look at all the news websites and their headlines. What do you see?
Mr. Pope, Tear Down this Wall! (Breitbart)
POPE PICKS FIGHT WITH TRUMP
ENTERS U.S. ELECTION BATTLE(Drudge)
Pope: Supporting Border Wall ‘Not Christian’ (Bretibart)
Pope Francis Implies Trump is not a Christian (Fox News)
Pope on Trump: Anyone who wants border walls ‘is not Christian’ (washington Post)

I understand why you want to make the issue be about Trump, but this is not what’s happening out there.
Its a political disaster for the Vatican - and I mean political as Pope Francis has unfortunately gotten into political issues which a Pope should not.

Trump won’t back off - will the Vatican. If it has any sense, it will at least have to nuance what the Pope said.
 
Trump lashed out at the Pope with completely inaccurate comments, and he is using the Pope to further his own cause. Not sure how any Catholic could vote for him. He blasts Cruz for being a liar, and now he intentionally perverts the Pope’s comments to make advances in a highly Evangelical state. Sorry–this all upsets me very much.

That is the sort of person he will be in the Oval Office–the ends justifies the means, no matter what.
I agree - but I don’t think this outburst will affect votes in any direction for anyone. I think a Catholic or any kind of Christian has a moral responsibility to oppose Trump. Ditto a good pagan. His goal is to deconstruct the GOP establishment, whatever that is - a nonviolent revolution, really, at least that is the pitch to the natives. Except for when he gets there, he’ll deal with everyone, including the liberals. My guess is he will be mindblowingly ‘establishment.’ Mitt Romney territory.

I am resigned to waiting it out - until we watch the blowback from his betrayed supporters, and also remember late night TV will be hilarious when he is in office - silver linings are out there to the cloud. I just hope we don’t get nuked under him…😉
 
Why is the Pope chiming into the American election anyway? I find it hard to believe that one of his advisors would not have informed/warned him how politically charged the immigration issue is in the United States, and the dangers of chiming in. It’s no surprise this is being spun by both sides.
Because this political situation also touches strongly on faith and morals, and the Vicar of Christ is not supposed to be afraid to speak truth. If we build a wall, without any concern for those we are locking out, then we are not acting in a Christian way.
 
Why is the Pope chiming into the American election battle anyway? I find it hard to believe that one of his advisors would not have informed/warned him how politically charged the immigration issue is in the United States, and the dangers of chiming in. It’s no surprise this is being spun by both sides, he should have expected and known this.
I thought political correctness was dead.
 
Not sure where the conversation is in this but I see nothing wrong with thinking one should speak English in the US.
See, that’s the thing. The Vatican has for a long-time considered the U.S. to be a bilingual country. No, I don’t have “proof” but why do you think priests are asked to study Spanish and some dioceses are looking to import Spanish-speaking priests? I imagine that can’t sit too well with someone who thinks only English should be spoken in the U.S.
 
There are good reason to say that Trump is not a Christian (his pride in wealth, his divorces and remarriages and fornication, which he probably never repented for) but his intention to build a border wall to protect the nation is not one of them.

The popes of earlier times did not oppose secular rulers keeping large groups of foreigners from entering their countries or even expelling them. There were many times throughout the centuries when Catholic rulers in Europe expelled Jews from their countries, and Muslims were expelled from Sicily and Spain,and the popes did not object. The protection and preservation of Catholic society was a higher priority than welcoming and tolerating foreigners. And the popes did not tell Catholic leaders or nations to welcome large numbers of immigrants,whether legal or illegal. They did not think that nations should allow unlimited numbers of foreigners to become citizens or that one of the purposes of a nation is to allow people from all over the world to come and be integrated and prosper. That view of nations only became common among after the United Nations was set up.
Respectfully: forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=13679141&postcount=410

I must watch doing this myself, even inadvertently.
 
I agree - but I don’t think this outburst will affect votes in any direction for anyone. I think a Catholic or any kind of Christian has a moral responsibility to oppose Trump. Ditto a good pagan. His goal is to deconstruct the GOP establishment, whatever that is - a nonviolent revolution, really, at least that is the pitch to the natives. Except for when he gets there, he’ll deal with everyone, including the liberals. My guess is he will be mindblowingly ‘establishment.’ Mitt Romney territory.

I am resigned to waiting it out - until we watch the blowback from his betrayed supporters, and also remember late night TV will be hilarious when he is in office - silver linings are out there to the cloud. I just hope we don’t get nuked under him…😉
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=13679141&postcount=410

I don’t question Mr. Trump’s Christianity and such remarks might be why he might respond forcefully.
 
Its a political disaster for the Vatican - and I mean political as Pope Francis has unfortunately gotten into political issues which a Pope should not.

Trump won’t back off - will the Vatican. If it has any sense, it will at least have to nuance what the Pope said.
I suspect the pope doesn’t give two hoots about the blowback. He’s not a politician and he doesn’t need any votes.
 
Because this political situation also touches strongly on faith and morals, and the Vicar of Christ is not supposed to be afraid to speak truth. If we build a wall, without any concern for those we are locking out, then we are not acting in a Christian way.
Then speak out also on abortion and same-sex marriage. On the Democratic candidates who both support it.

Isn’t abortion a bigger issue than the border fence?
 
See, that’s the thing. The Vatican has for a long-time considered the U.S. to be a bilingual country. No, I don’t have “proof” but why do you think priests are asked to study Spanish and some dioceses are looking to import Spanish-speaking priests? I imagine that can’t sit too well with someone who thinks only English should be spoken in the U.S.
We are a multi-lingual nation in that sense, that is true. It is easy to see why we are called an English speaking nation as well.

People like Pat Buchanan have probably argued that one language unifies people. We don’t say others can not speak it but I’d have to say, America is an English speaking country. If one wants to say the Catholic Church is bilingual, sure it is, the Church. We can find Masses in many other languages as well.
 
Its a political disaster for the Vatican - and I mean political as Pope Francis has unfortunately gotten into political issue which a Pope should not.

Trump won’t back off - will the Vatican. If it has any sense, it will at least have to nuance what the Pope said.
The Pope was 100% correct, and Trump (along with all those headlines) were 100% wrong. If we build a wall, without any concern for those being locked out, then we are not behaving as Christians. That is not hard to understand–and this Pope is not afraid to speak truth to power. He has done it many times. He rocked the world when he blasted the Italian Mafia–and during his trip to Mexico, his homilies spoke to the corruptions and rug problems found in Mexico. This Pope has the Holy Spirit riding on his shoulder and he knows that the immigration crisis we face is political, moral and faith based in nature.
 
"For a religious leader to question a person’s faith is disgraceful. No leader, especially a religious leader, has the right to question another man’s religion or faith,” he told a packed room at a golf course resort. Trump then accused the Mexican government of “using the pope as a pawn”. (note: this implies that Trump thinks the Pope is allowing himself to be used as a pawn by the Mexican government).

When the Pope speaks about faith and morals, we are to take they very seriously. Certainly, when he speaks about those at the border, that is a moral and political issue, and the faith has something to say as well.

All Catholics sin the USA hould be giving serious thought to what the Pope said.
I agree with you, but at the same time I feel that assuming because Pope X XX said X therefore X puts one in perilous danger of missing the point, much like Trump and the entirety of the American media seems to be doing.

You can build a wall to protect yourself, and you can keep out people who would do harm to your nation without also being a drum banging nationalist intent on keeping out “those” people. That’s what Pope Francis’ point is. We need to make the debate about what the real issue and what real effects it would have on such a large group of people. Taking this into account makes me disagree with Donald Trump’s stance, but some argue differently. That doesn’t make them ‘UnCatholic’ or ‘UnChristian’ as long as they have taken a very carefully thought out stance that takes into account the pain that would be felt by many people but still concludes that the common good necessitates it.
 
Then speak out also on abortion and same-sex marriage. On the Democratic candidates who both support it.

Isn’t abortion a bigger issue than the border fence?
Yes, and the Pope has condemned abortion in strong ways. In fact, he just released statements calling abortion a crime. He will not call politicians out by name, just as he did not call Trump out by name. And, the Church has a strong record in defending marriage. The Pope has every expectation that our own Bishops will also do their part and that lay Catholics are supposed to follow the very faith they claim.
 
In the general? I sure can. If it’s between someone who gives lip service to pro-life causes and someone who actively advocates infanticide until the last foot has left the birth canal, i’m voting me some Trump.
Hahahaha!

I’m getting to really like you.😃
 
Then speak out also on abortion and same-sex marriage. On the Democratic candidates who both support it.

Isn’t abortion a bigger issue than the border fence?
He has spoken out against abortion and same-sex marriage. I mean, every time the guy says something does he have to include life issues? “I’d like a cup of tea, oh by the way stop killing babies!” “We need to give of ourselves to help the poor, and also marriage cannot be redefined!”
 
Trump lashed out at the Pope, twice in a couple weeks. Does not bode well, and I cannot for the life me understand how any Catholic can vote for him. But that’s their own choice.
Maybe Trump’s tone wasn’t the best, but he talks like that to everyone to be fair. I think that’s part of his appeal… “not beholden to any outside person/donor/entity” including the Pope. 🤷
 
We are a multi-lingual nation in that sense, that is true. It is easy to see why we are called an English speaking nation as well.

People like Pat Buchanan have probably argued that one language unifies people. We don’t say others can not speak it but I’d have to say, America is an English speaking country. If one wants to say the Catholic Church is bilingual, sure it is, the Church. We can find Masses in many other languages as well.
I know that. But Hispanics constitute (or is it comprise?) 40% of Catholics within the US. and there are some projections that within a decade they’ll be in the majority (of Catholics, that is). Somehow you have to deal with that. English isn’t exactly the easiest of languages to learn and speak well.
 
No kidding. Like anyone couldn’t go over or under it. Perhaps making it illegal for employers to exploit these poor souls might be better if it were actually enforced.
Indeed! But you’re making sense, and that seems to be unpopular in this election cycle. :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top