I
inJESUS
Guest
anyway, i hope Abdul Rahman won’t be killed…i will pray that God gives him power through his crisis…
Yeah you don’t think you fabricate things, or maybe you think too hard.i feel sympathy for him for leaving islam?
i feel sympathy for him for rejecting the truth?
i feel sympathy for him cuz he will burn in hell?
i feel sympathy for him cuz he won’t get the virgins?
i can add a thousand reason…that’s why : i will pray for him is a very vague answer.
Just like you condemned it plainly, he could do the same…
you see what i mean Shadowycry? maybe he will pray for him to be released from his blindness and go back to islam? maybe yes maybe no. When i asked him if he condemns it, he said : i will pray for him…that is truly an evasive answer.My comment was solicited specifically in the first post of this thread.
Of course I will pray for Abdul.
I will also pray for you and cestusdei to be released from your blindness.
the first explanation could be linked to his post when he linked praying for Abdel Rahman with praying to other “Christians” for their blindness…i know i might be streching too far on such a sentence, but my idea is that his answer is not straghforward…it is a yes/no question. If he indeed condemned, let me know cuz i might have missed some posts.Yeah you don’t think you fabricate things, or maybe you think too hard.
I believe you should go with the simplest expination that comes to your head.
Namaste!It is a little late now.
This litte segment I found interesting. What is the Shariah Law?
Shadowcry he did go with the simplest explanation, hence this:Yeah you don’t think you fabricate things, or maybe you think too hard.
I believe you should go with the simplest expination that comes to your head.
If you were able to respond with a simple answer, why cant Pro? I understand exactly where InJesus is coming from, praying for one does not mean you condone/condem an action.Originally Posted by Shadowcry
I condemn it.
#1 - Islam needs to be destroyed (not merely their governments). #2 - Secular governments are evil. There should be no separation of Church and state. #3 - Democratic republics can work, but aristocracies are better and Catholic monarchies are best!I dont want to destroy islam but i do want to destroy every islamic government in this world, every government should be secular. I hope america invades pakistan and iran and every other muslim run country and replaces there oppresive governments with a democracy.
Wake up! The government will execute him. But the shariah, which is the juridical arm of the Quran gave the orders for him to be executed.Thats the government not Islam.
What church attacked David Koresh?do u people know what happened to David Koresh and his followers (among them were innocent children)?
Read the link posted above by inJesus. It is a muslim site that says that killing apostates is the muslim law. It is not going against islam, it is islam. Muslims are so deceptive, they claim their religion is the religion of peace and that those who kill apostates are going against the religion but the religion says that apostates are to be killed by the caliph.Face it, this thread is about bashing Islam like every other one cestusdei posts on this forum.
The point is not to demonize Christians. The point is to make clear how blazingly hypocritical it is to demand that all muslims take responsibility for crimes like the one against this Abdul Rahman, while simultaneously denying that Christianity is responsible for any crime at all.
Just 20 years ago, there was a whole Church group preaching that blacks were meant to be subdued and that Christianity supported Apartheid. Of course, if someone brings up an example like that, you all say “But they weren’t following Jesus!”
In contrast, when examples of crimes by muslims like the one above are posted, and a muslim comes to say “This is not following Islam!,” half the board pounces on him and says “OH YES IT IS ISLAM! You must take responsibility for this! This is your teaching!”
That is hypocrisy, pure and simple.
well Afghanistan is run by US… i am sure they will intervene… isnt that why we are there in the first place? i bet its more than just him converting. he probably did something to [REMOVED OBSCENITY] everyone off… there are two sides to every story.He is a Christian who converted from Islam. Now he is on trial in Afghanistan. If convicted he will be executed. What about freedom of religion or no compulsion in religion? He was offered clemency if he reconverted to Islam (yeah out of fear of death). He refused. God bless him. If they kill him he will be a real martyr.
PS: I wonder if pro and his ilk will protest his trial and execution?
You mention Christians killing apostates but you do not mention the difference. It is Islamic law that apostates be killed by the caliph, it is not Christian law that apostates be killed and it never has been. You may be able to point back to the 4th century and find that a few apostates may have died but you will never find it made a Christian law. Islam is the most violent religion on the planet.What does “Of course I will pray for Abdul” mean to you, and where have you seen before in this thread?
As for Islamic teaching, this is a perfect example of what I was talking about. Christians kill apostates with the sanction of every Christian authority for centuries, and you say “that’s not real Christianity!”
Muslims kill an apostate, you say “that’s real Islam!” without any indication that you see the irony in what you just denied about Christianity.
brother, the same goes for your point. Why are you forcing all Islam to own the Taliban, if Christianity doesn’t have to own its members’ crimes?
Ah, the old shell game. So you would have us believe that the execution of this Christian is not because of muslim teaching but is really the fault of the U.S., but he deserves to be executed anyway.well Afghanistan is run by US… i am sure they will intervene… isnt that why we are there in the first place? i bet its more than just him converting. he probably did something to piss everyone off… there are two sides to every story.
wait… how do you connect the saying “US can intervene” with its the “fault of the US”… i am confused…Ah, the old shell game. So you would have us believe that the execution of this Christian is not because of muslim teaching but is really the fault of the U.S., but the he deserves to be executed anyway.
Why the quoting of Leviticus? Christians do no live by Levitical law, nor seek to impose it on anyone.But u need 2 be honest & see what jewish/christian scriptures says 1st.
Leviticus 24:16
16 whoever blasphemes the name of the LORD shall be put to death. The whole community shall stone him; alien and native alike must be put to death for blaspheming the LORD’S name.
You see, when Muslims don’t have a response to objective criticism of their religion they start to compulsively quote random passages from the Old Testament. It’s an interesting phenomenon… Look around at other threads on this subforum and you’ll see what I mean.Why the quoting of Leviticus? Christians do no live by Levitical law, nor seek to impose it on anyone.