Indeed.
I reject some of these obviously flawed patriarchal attempts at neurotic control of the sexual urge (and gender relations), and I reject the absolutist position on interpretation of that Biblical injunction. Even the Bible allows divorce elsewhere in it.
It allows for stonings, but there was a new and everlasting covenant.
**Mat 19:5 For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife, and they two shall be in one flesh.
Mat 19:6 Therefore now they are not two, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let no man put asunder.
Mat 19:7 They say to him: Why then did Moses command to give a bill of divorce, and to put away?
Mat 19:8 He saith to them: Because Moses by reason of the hardness of your heart permitted you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.
Mat 19:9 And I say to you, that whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and he that shall marry her that is put away, committeth adultery.
Mat 19:10 His disciples say unto him: If the case of a man with his wife be so, it is not expedient to marry.
Mat 19:11 Who said to them: All men take not this word, but they to whom it is given.
Mat 19:12 For there are eunuchs, who were born so from their mothers womb: and there are eunuchs, who were made so by men: and there are eunuchs, who have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven. He that can take, let him take it. **
If you wish to discuss it further, start another thread and let’s return to the topic of this discussion, please.