H
Hadi
Guest
MW, maybe it’s now the time for you to stop posting these unnecessary posts…
It wasn’t obvious that that was what you were trying to say! I don’t know why you didn’t just say that in the first place. Can you confirm that “I AM” is one of the names in the Quran?That God has more than one name, obviously.
That’s what I was trying to do!?! I honestly did not understand what you were trying to say.It would be a courtesy, I think, to let me say what I am saying, rather than ask me if I’m saying something because I am not saying something else.
So you believe that Exodus may have been corrupted, but don’t know for sure and can’t prove it. Then on what do you base your opinion?What I said is that I cannot prove to you that Exodus is corrupted. I did not say that it actually isn’t corrupted. Perhaps the difference is subtle, but I am emphasizing it now. I think Exodus might have been corrupted, but I simply can’t prove it. Therefore I can’t really continue the discussion on the matter, can I?
Understood. I never said you thought Moses was a liar. I only asked *if *that was your contention because I couldn’t figure out what you were trying to say.About Moses being a liar, I did say that Moses is not a liar.
Okay. Again, can you confirm that the name God gave Moses, “I AM” is in the Quran? If I have time later I will try to look it up myself, but if you have the citation handy I thought that would be easier. Also, other than in the Quran, are there any other scriptures that give the other namessssssssss (plural) that God has given us. Thanks.About God changing His name, what I am saying is that God has more than one name. To Him belong the most beautiful Namessssss. Plural.
Yes, like follow me around on this thread.Can’t say, as I have far better things to do than read his websites and books.
Actually, the traditional interpretation of that hadith is that ‘they’ refers to the women who were complaining, though the placement of the pronoun ‘they’ and the predicate ‘are not the best among you’ can refer to either the husbands or the wives. All Spencer has done is give the hadith its historical and majority understanding. He provides the references, so that his audience can see where the traditions of wife beating come from. Your ‘beef’ isn’t with Spencer, its with your religious leaders. Instead of trying to convince us that Spencer is a rat, why don’t you pull the hair out of the rats in Islamic countries who have gotten the hadith so wrong for so long.The hadith is one where some women had complained to the Prophet about their husbands beating them, and the Prophet replied that “they” are not the best among “you.” And Spencer’s book claimed that it was the women who were “not the best” because they were complaining. He actually spelled that out. When in fact, the hadith is saying the opposite, that the men were “not the best” because they were beating their wives.That’s the sort of problem I have with Robert Spencer. He takes an actual hadith, and either mistranslates it, or gives the wrong meaning from it, misinterpreting it. Either tactic is deceitful
Several pages ago, I was asked to give my thoughts on Christians and prayer, specifically, what should be the form of our prayers. This is an interesting question, as it highlights one of the important differences between Islam and Christianity.You mean Jesus taught his disciples to engage in cannibalism?
You see, I don’t have a problem with the “Lord’s prayer.” It’s pretty Islamic actually. On the otherhand, Jesus did fall on his face to pray to God. If it’s not important, why did he do that?
People always say that actions speak louder than words. Did Jesus not teach by actions?
The whole Quran is Muhammad’s words, but as far as him being a liar - well, he was.Ah, the Meccans were quite unsure what to do about Muhammad. They did ridicule him, it’s true. They labeled him a liar, a madman, a poet, a magician, a soothsayer, and even called him possessed. Eventually they realized how silly that all was, that they couldn’t even decide how to ridicule him! So I laugh back at you. The Qur’an hardly qualifies as “banter,” as it doesn’t include any words from Muhammad’s companions, and doesn’t include the words of Muhammad either. But you’ll say it is Muhammad’s words, to which I will point out that it differs vastly in style from all recorded sayings of Muhammad. If he were a man to create such eloquence as in the Qur’an, why abstain from it on a regular basis? If he could produce such language as to convince people utterly that he was reciting the Word of God, why not just call himself divine, rather than a slave of the divine?
I have read nothing to indicate the opposite position in Islam. Maybe a Muslim can show us exactly where it says that they should tell us the truth about Islam.Al-taqiyya and dissimulation are words used for a practice of Muslims blatantly lying to non-Muslims. All but some of the most fundamental Muslims consider the act of Al-taqiyya or lying to non-Muslims to be a good work. This is very important when one remembers that, in Islam, salvation is determined by good works. This means that a Muslim lying to a non-Muslim is that Muslim doing a good work to earn salvation. It is almost equivalent to a Christian accepting Jesus as his savior. One of the big differences is that a Christian only needs to accept Jesus as his savior once to become saved forever but a Muslim must do his good works consistently and repeatedly to earn his salvation with the except of the greatest work of dying while fighting non-Muslims.
Thank you for your kind words. I’ve been studying various religions, primarily Christianity and Islam for several decades now. The vast bulk of my writings on this page aren’t my ideas-I’m just repeating what people who are far smarter than I say. I merely compare and evaluate their thoughts.Steve,
Welcome to the forums, it seems you are quite talented with your answers.
Have you dont intense study of religion?
which are the unnecessary posts ?MW, maybe it’s now the time for you to stop posting these unnecessary posts…
related link:I have heard that they believe He was actually nailed to cross,
No ; It’s not mentioned in Quran or hadith.then went to India to live to be 120 years old.
Anything that goes with the message of Quran is accepted to us . That goes against Quran is not the truth like death of Jesus (pbuh) on the Cross , his divinity etc.they use this as an example for prostration in prayer
**
Allah Almighty says in the Qur’an: “And concerning their saying, ‘We killed the Messiah Jesus son of Mary, Allah’s Messenger.’ They killed him not, nor crucified, but it appeared so to them**. Indeed those who disagree concerning it are in doubt about it. They have no (true) knowledge about it except that they follow conjecture. Surely, they did not kill him. But Allah did take him up unto Himself. Allah is ever Mighty, Wise.” (An-Nisaa’: 157-158)
…Muslims need to believe only what has been clearly stated by Allah in the Qur’an and by the Prophet Muhammad, peace be on him. And so they do not feel the compulsion to wander in the realm of conjecture about things of which there cannot be certain knowledge. And Allah knows best.
No ; It’s not mentioned in Quran or hadith.
So, what does this mean? Muslims don’t even believe Jesus was nailed to the cross? I’m not asking for conjecture. I’m asking what Muslims believe happened to Jesus during the Passion. Or do Muslims believe nothing happened to Jesus and one day He is preaching God’s message and the next He just disappeared for no reason?
And I understand your bolded part. Muslims seem to believe that God deliberately deceived Jesus’ followers so that Christianity would be started, people (Christians) would think Jesus was God and He could then send them all to hell for “associating partners” with Him.
What do you consider spam? Anyone posting something that you don’t want to read?I agree…just look at what page we are in now…
I thought R_not was on top of the spamming business but now MW is taking the lead
That’s good.real friends are always warm.I know about the turkish Muslims.Most of .them are very different than other muslims.But most of Muslims consider turkish Muslims as heretic and non religious.Even many Muslims consider the turkish people as Kafir because still Turkish muslims are not violent or hateful like rest of Muslim world.I can say about My own countrymen(bangladeshi).My all friends are Muslim(except 2) and their behavior to Non Muslims are very good.But It is just a sugar coat.They also can hug non Muslims warmly,but when the non Muslims are not with them then they address them as Kafir,the enemy of islam,the agent of india,profane,unclean etc etc.It is true,I am the witness.Like my muslim family,My Muslims friends also think me as a Muslim(of course as atheist Muslim,but as a muslim),so they do not hesitate infront of me when they use abusive words to non Muslims.And in our country there is a common nagative word for hindus and that is “Malaun”.I do not know it’s exact meaning because it is not a Bangla word,it is just a common slang for hindus,and it is used instead of profane,so it’s meaning is profane or same thing…So if Muslims show warmness,then all are Just their fake behavior.But since your friends are turkish,so I hope that they are really Good.I am not telling that all non turkish Muslims are sugar coated quinine,but I just wanted to say that most of Muslims are like that(sugar coated quinine).Most of them never love their non Muslim friends from their heart.And Bangladesh is a real moderate Muslim country.So if most of muslims of bangladesh are like that,then I can easily imagine(how horrific they are!) about the muslims of extremist countries like pakistan,Iran,saudi arabia,and others.yeah I try not to be disrespectful toward Mohammed as well even though I don’t acknowledge him as a prophet. My friendships with my Turkish friends are too important for me. I don’t need to disrespect Mohammed just because I disagree with Islam theology and like I said all of the Turks I’ve met have welcomed me with open arms and they know I’m Christian so it’s never been a problem I don’t debate theology with them when I want to debate Islam theology I come in here for that.
A Muslim friend told me that someone was crucified but it wasn’t Jesus and they don’t know who the person was I’ve heard other Muslims say that it was Jesus but at some point God took the real Jesus back into heaven and replaced him with someone who looked like Jesus so that people ended up thinking Jesus died on the cross when in fact he did not. People just thought they killed him and that’s how Muslims explain the disappearance of Jesus from this world.So, what does this mean? Muslims don’t even believe Jesus was nailed to the cross? I’m not asking for conjecture. I’m asking what Muslims believe happened to Jesus during the Passion. Or do Muslims believe nothing happened to Jesus and one day He is preaching God’s message and the next He just disappeared for no reason?
And I understand your bolded part. Muslims seem to believe that God deliberately deceived Jesus’ followers so that Christianity would be started, people (Christians) would think Jesus was God and He could then send them all to hell for “associating partners” with Him.
Thank you. Do you know what they believe regarding all of the time leading up to the crucifixion? Do they believe in the scouraging at the pillar, crowning with thorns, etc.?A Muslim friend told me that someone was crucified but it wasn’t Jesus and they don’t know who the person was I’ve heard other Muslims say that it was Jesus but at some point God took the real Jesus back into and heaven and replaced him with someone who looked like Jesus so that people ended up thinking Jesus died on the cross when in fact he did not. People just thought they killed him and that’s how Muslims explain the disappearance of Jesus from this world.
I think they do but I can’t be sure because my friend and I never discussed it at length it was just part of a brief conversation.Thank you. Do you know what they believe regarding all of the time leading up to the crucifixion? Do they believe in the scouraging at the pillar, crowning with thorns, etc.?
I too take offense to her saying that the Lord’s prayer is Islamic for the very same reasons that you do. But I think her comments about the Eucharist and saying that the disciples engaged in cannibalism was just about as offensive as you can possibly get. In fact I thought it might be a violation of the rules of this forum because one of them is that everyone must be respectful of Catholicism and that clearly is not being respectful when you equate the Eucharist with cannibalism.Although I am not sure how much (if any) stock I put into such things, I have read that the differences in prayer postures in the East and the West has to do with what was historically considered a humble, supplicative posture in the given regions. For what it’s worth, I have no problem with prostration and do engage in it myself privately (as a Latin Rite Catholic, this would be inappropriate at Mass).
I do take great offense at the suggestion that the Lord’s Prayer is Islamic, though. I understand that you mean that it is in harmony with Islamic principles, but in the context of our differing theologies, this cannot be the truth. For worship of the Father, from whom the Son is eternally begotten, it is a beautiful prayer shared by Christians all over the world, given to us by the Son Himself who you deny in every other arena. It is not right, then, that you should lay claim to something given to you by the One who you have rejected. You reject His sacrifice but claim His prayer? I do not know what to say to that. It is deeply offensive, even if you meant it as something positive (I’m assuming you did, given the smiley).
I am tired of Christ and the faith being treated as frivolities everywhere. It wears on the soul. God, give me strength from You to resist the ways of the world and its profanities.
The Lord’s Prayer (“Our Father”/Abun D’Bashmayo) in Syriac
Was Jesus in the East or the West?Although I am not sure how much (if any) stock I put into such things, I have read that the differences in prayer postures in the East and the West has to do with what was historically considered a humble, supplicative posture in the given regions. For what it’s worth, I have no problem with prostration and do engage in it myself privately (as a Latin Rite Catholic, this would be inappropriate at Mass).
Of course it is the truth. The sole exception is actually calling God “Father,” which isn’t found in Islam, but even the style of the prayer is Islamic. Because the prayer is first of all directed to the Almighty, who is described as being in heaven, and then His name is honored. It talks about the will of God being done both on earth and heaven, demonstrating that the person praying is submitting himself to God’s will. It asks for sustenance, which comes only from God, so acknowledges the person’s dependence on Him. It also includes an element of repentance, seeking forgiveness. And it asks for guidance and steadfastness in religion, on His Law.I do take great offense at the suggestion that the Lord’s Prayer is Islamic, though. I understand that you mean that it is in harmony with Islamic principles, but in the context of our differing theologies, this cannot be the truth. For worship of the Father, from whom the Son is eternally begotten, it is a beautiful prayer shared by Christians all over the world, given to us by the Son Himself who you deny in every other arena. It is not right, then, that you should lay claim to something given to you by the One who you have rejected. You reject His sacrifice but claim His prayer? I do not know what to say to that. It is deeply offensive, even if you meant it as something positive (I’m assuming you did, given the smiley).
The book is called the politically incorrect guide to Islam, and the chapter was on women. Seems to be chapter 5 (I looked online.) If you can get a hold of the book, examine that chapter. If I recall correctly, the discussion of this hadith spanned two pages, i.e., the page had to be turned in order to read the whole thing. Maybe you can go look. The hadith is “Certainly they are not the best among you.” I don’t have the Arabic handy, though this is a frequent hadith cited by Muslims, which you can check to see how they interpret it. You can check here, for instance: khilaafah.com/systems/social_relations/khilafah_5.htmlHmm. In order to respond I’d need, as a minimum, the name of Mr. Spencer’s book, and the Haddith he was citing. Would you happen to recall both of those? Otherwise, I would have to say that your allegation is unproven. The fact is that Mr. Spencer is very careful with his translations and uses mainstream Islamic scholarship, unless otherwise cited. Additionally, he is willing to discuss his ideas with anyone, especially Muslims. Consequentially, without more information, I’d have to say that your claim is unproven.
Regards,