K
kbf1970060
Guest
I’ll do what I can, both to answer your questions, and repeat, what I believe has already been provided, if not patiently, then kindly.
Q1 What is an affiliated force? A1 Assumption: Hamas, and any other “force” satisfying what is specified in the act, as mentioned in the previous post.
Q2 Who determines who falls into that category? A2 That would depend on the act commited, and by whom, and for whom, again as specified in the act, as mentioned in the previous post.
Q3 How long exactly will the duration of “The Global War on Terror” be? A3 Again, see the previous post, and the act: when hostilities against The U.S., and coalition forces, stop.
Q4 … don’t people accused of terrorism have the same constitutional rights as people accused of rape or murder or any other crime? A4 It seems apparent, that you neither have assumed, that I am correct, nor have you checked the matter for yourself; however, I will answer your question. The answer is the following: no. Please read The U.S. Constitution, particularly the section, concerning the constitutionality of the act, according to Article I, Section 8. Both U.S. citizens, and resident aliens of The U.S., whom have commited some offense in The U.S., retain their constitutional rights. Those whom aid, support, harbor, The Taliban, Al-Qaeda, affiliated forces with The Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and those whom planned, supported, etc., the attacks against America, of Sep. 11th, 2001, may be detained according to the public law mentioned in the previous post, or they may be transfered to a different court, a different country, or to their country of origin. (This answer is not absolute, but reflects in part, the act.)
The third option is plain: you are wrong either on A, or B, or both A and B, and I believe it is the last option, that is pertinent to you: you are wrong both with respect to your options A and B; although, you are correct, that you do fail to see, which is your own responsibility, and the remedy would be to read those sections of the act, some 5?? pages in length, and, again, review the authority exercised by not only the executive branch of The U.S. governemnt, but also the legislative branch of The U.S. government, with respect to the employment of our U.S. Armed Forces, as granted by The U.S. Constitution. Unless your preference(s) either are to be ignorant of what The U.S. Constitution says, or apathetic about what The U.S. Constitution says, or both ignorant, and apathetic, about what The U.S. Constitution says.
There is nothing in the act, to state: a U.S. citizen may be detained indefinitely without trial, unless it is done according to The U.S. Constitution, and subsequent amendments. If you wish to differ on the matter, then reference the same act, that I have cited, and provide section(s), and quotes, briefly. Unless, you would like your actions on this site to be regarded as both belligerent, and in support of The Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and whomever supported, planned, facilitated the attacks against America, during Sep. 11th, 2001. (I’m kidding, although, the questions make me scratch my head, in a suspicious manner, as I read your post(s).)
A failure to see must be driven toward the success of seeing, at some point, as you will it. You may gain further respect for what those whom serve our country do, and have done, during this War Against Terrorism: when you read and consider those sections of the act, pertinent to what we are discussing, and Article, and Section, of The U.S. Constitution, which delineates authority for such an act, to exist. Thank you for your questions, and the link, and previous quote of yours, to which I replied. I gained further insight into the matter. I hope, that you will as well.
