Romney stands by message in secret video

  • Thread starter Thread starter oldcelt
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Being successful? Hmm…I’m pretty sure that’s what you call a person who runs for president and wins the first time round, hands down - complete with fully disclosed tax returns. šŸ˜‰
He was a good political candidate. Did not make him a good President.
 
Seekerz when will the Left get over that canard? Conservatives are FAR more charitable than those on the Left who feel they have discharged duty to their fellow man by voting that other people pay more taxes.

What Republican has said ā€œsurvival of the fittestā€ or ā€œyou’re on your own.ā€ Those are DEMOCRAT talking points and unsupported claims made in an effort to demean those who want to protect life before birth.

Who is running the pregnancy care centers (not abortion mills) who is volunteering in shelters and soup kitchens and taking in foster children? The Left?

I believe both sides care about the poor and those struggling to make it in our country. The difference is in the approach not the intention. We believe our approach is not only more charitable but also more effective. The Leftist big government approach has failed and if anything has institutionalized poverty.

We need a different approach but first we need compassion for all human beings. If human life is devalued unless someone decides it is of value, where to begin?

Lisa
Do you have any evidence to support your implication that volunteering and charity are preserves of the right? :confused:

As for the left, I’m not sure why you think I should answer for them - I paddle my own canoe - it named The Independence.
 
He was a good political candidate. Did not make him a good President.
I believe I was responding to a post about ā€œbeing successfulā€? He was a good candidate and he is a fairly good president - flaws and missteps notwithstanding.
 
Maybe you reading somewhere about love? Do you love Obama and Biden too? Should I even ask if you treat Obama with a Golden Rule as well?
I generally have no personal feelings for any candidate. I only care about their stances on the issues. I think I would like Paul Ryan from what I’ve seen on television. I cared for Ronald Reagan - when he was shot I definitely felt a sense of great personal loss and concern. I was quite moved during his funeral. And John F. Kennedy was a personal hero of mine during my youth. My thoughts evolved over the years, however, once I discovered he had the moral standards of Bill Clinton. Too bad, because I really liked him as a kid. I still admire him for many of his accomplishments as President. He had a decent fiscal record for a Democrat, not unlike Bill Clinton.
 
I believe I was responding to a post about ā€œbeing successfulā€? He was a good candidate and he is a fairly good president - flaws and missteps notwithstanding.
ā€œGoodā€ compared to who, Jimmy Carter?
 
My question for you is, if you are a returning Catholic, why do you support a party that supports butchering the unborn? Answer that question and we can go from there.

Ishii
While I’m not a returning Catholic and certainly can’t speak for Ecoclimber, perhaps some of your question is being answered on another thread, Ishii. From what I’m gathering from some of the Catholics there it has to do with Faithful Citizenship. And voting for a candidate who favors abortion choice as long as your intent is not to support abortion. But voting for them for other grave moral reasons the voter finds. Faithful Citizenship lists many other serious moral issues. And states you can’t use opposition to an intrinsic evil to be indifferent to these other matters. Anyway maybe that will help with your question about how a Catholic can perhaps determine to vote for the Democratic Party. God bless and peace my brother. Have a most blessed Lord’s Day.
 
While I’m not a returning Catholic and certainly can’t speak for Ecoclimber, perhaps some of your question is being answered on another thread, Ishii. From what I’m gathering from some of the Catholics there it has to do with Faithful Citizenship. And voting for a candidate who favors abortion choice as long as your intent is not to support abortion. But voting for them for other grave moral reasons the voter finds. Faithful Citizenship lists many other serious moral issues. And states you can’t use opposition to an intrinsic evil to be indifferent to these other matters. Anyway maybe that will help with your question about how a Catholic can perhaps determine to vote for the Democratic Party. God bless and peace my brother. Have a most blessed Lord’s Day.
In other words, " I don’t support Obama because of his support for infanticide (partial birth abortion), I support Obama because he wants to (insert pet welfare program) ." Your logic is twisted, Cmatt. Its like saying, " I don’t support the racist KKK candidate because I’m a racist, I support racist KKK candidate for other ā€œgraveā€ reasons." If that sounds absurd, it is.

I wonder if Obama voting Christians will ever admit the truth: deep down they don’t really care about the unborn.

Ishii
 
Seekerz when will the Left get over that canard? Conservatives are FAR more charitable than those on the Left who feel they have discharged duty to their fellow man by voting that other people pay more taxes.

What Republican has said ā€œsurvival of the fittestā€ or ā€œyou’re on your own.ā€ Those are DEMOCRAT talking points and unsupported claims made in an effort to demean those who want to protect life before birth.

Who is running the pregnancy care centers (not abortion mills) who is volunteering in shelters and soup kitchens and taking in foster children? The Left?

I believe both sides care about the poor and those struggling to make it in our country. The difference is in the approach not the intention. We believe our approach is not only more charitable but also more effective. The Leftist big government approach has failed and if anything has institutionalized poverty.

We need a different approach but first we need compassion for all human beings. If human life is devalued unless someone decides it is of value, where to begin?

Lisa
Exactly. Socialist rhetoric used to justify voting pro-choice is just that…empty rhetoric. Somehow, supporting the bloated bureaucracy is equated to ā€œcare for the poor.ā€ I see no evidence that bloated, bureucratic programs are helping the poor. In fact, they seem to be hurting them and worsening society. Solidarity does not mean government programs.
 
Oh come on Meltzer and Rich. True Romney to my knowledge has not spoken of being black. But somewhere, was it on the infamous now not so secret video? But somewhere I recently heard him say he would have a better chance of winning the Presidency if he were Mexican, born of Mexcian parents and not merely of American parents in Mexico. So maybe he doesn’t use the story of being a poor black kid but sounded like he wishes he were Latino for this election.
 
In other words, " I don’t support Obama because of his support for infanticide (partial birth abortion), I support Obama because he wants to (insert pet welfare program) ." Your logic is twisted, Cmatt. Its like saying, " I don’t support the racist KKK candidate because I’m a racist, I support racist KKK candidate for other ā€œgraveā€ reasons." If that sounds absurd, it is.

I wonder if Obama voting Christians will ever admit the truth: deep down they don’t really care about the unborn.

Ishii
Yeah it sounded absurd to me to compare voting for Obama to voting for a KKK candidate. No you’re dead wrong Ishii if you believe Obama voting Christians don’t persnally care about the unborn. You can’t see into their hearts you know.
 
Oh come on Rich and Meltzer. Sure Romney hasn’t said he was a poor black kid. But he wishes he were Mexican.

hispanicbusiness.com/2012/9/18/mitt_romney_wishes_parents_were_mexican.htm
I think it’s funny that people make such a big deal about this comment. He is 100% correct, that he would get a lot of votes from the hispanic community, if he were Mexican. Racial politics are a reality. All he was doing was acknowledging that fact. 🤷

Besides, if he were Mexican, he could claim that white people who don’t vote for him are racists…but, he would have to be a Democrat to play that game…
 
Yeah it sounded absurd to me to compare voting for Obama to voting for a KKK candidate. No you’re dead wrong Ishii if you believe Obama voting Christians don’t persnally care about the unborn. You can’t see into their hearts you know.
I look at their actions though - and they continually vote for the most pro-abortion president in history - what else can I conclude? If you really care about the unborn then quit supporting the president who is in favor of their continued legal slaughter.

As for the KKK analogy - if the shoe fits. I used racism because most liberals view (correctly) that racism is evil. Legal abortion is also evil. If you rationalize your support for a candidate who supports the evil of legal abortion, how is that different from supporting the candidate who supports racism? I doubt highly that any liberal Democrat would even remotely consider supporting an avowed racist - in spite of whatever other redeeming positions that racist had - racism would disqualify the candidate. But when it comes to abortion, they support the pro-abortion candidate. This is inconsistent. Please tell me where I’m wrong with this, Cmatt. Or, would you in fact support the racist, KKK candidate if he/she supported welfare programs for the ā€œpoorā€ ?

Ishii
 
I think it’s funny that people make such a big deal about this comment. He is 100% correct, that he would get a lot of votes from the hispanic community, if he were Mexican. Racial politics are a reality. All he was doing was acknowledging that fact. 🤷

Besides, if he were Mexican, he could claim that white people who don’t vote for him are racists…but, he would have to be a Democrat to play that game…
Agreed. However, with Romney one never knows: he may even become a Democrat if he loses the Presidential election or, in line with dissonance theory, he may become more conservative. If he wins, all bets are off concerning both his politics and policies.
 
Agreed. However, with Romney one never knows: he may even become a Democrat if he loses the Presidential election or, in line with dissonance theory, he may become more conservative. If he wins, all bets are off concerning both his politics and policies.
:rolleyes: :yawn:
 
Being successful? Hmm…I’m pretty sure that’s what you call a person who runs for president and wins the first time round, hands down - complete with fully disclosed tax returns. šŸ˜‰
If your only accomplishment is disclosing tax returns it’s a pretty thin record. Surely competence, integrity and executive skills are more important to the American’ people’s future than a tax return?

Lisa
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top