Should women be treated as equals

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bradskii
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I have seen hundreds of photos of life inside Germany during the war. And in the field. Crosses marked all graves. I recall one military funeral where high-ranking German officers were at a gravesite. The Union Jack was held over the grave.
 
Nobody takes on more workers to produce the same amount. If more workers are added to the payroll then it is a means to increase productivity.
People may take on more workers in response to government regulation. The current workers lose some hours , and the new workers take on those exact hours. Same product is produced, more or less. The goal is to avoid providing health insurance or to water down future retirement payments or to avoid cutting those important people call Vice this or that. But all that is just my personal ax to grind.
Are there negatives in a woman earning a degree?
When weighing the cost to value for their future plans, a man or a woman might decide it is not worth it, so it would be an overall negative to waste the time and money pursuing a certain degree. I will point out that religious sisters often have degrees (they all seem to around here). Also many laywomen do as well.
 
Speaking of the past. From marxists.org

"For this reason the reactionary power by which the peasants had hitherto been dominated had to be destroyed, so that the peasants should become supporters of Bolshevism spiritually as well as materially. That was possible only by way of a struggle against the Church, in the most radical form by way of an intensive propaganda against religion in general.

“This struggle, which was waged directly thru the “League of the Godless” but with the support of the State, was scarcely distinguishable in character and content from the one which was waged earlier in western Europe by the bourgeois materialists and free thinkers. It had nothing whatever to do with Marxism. And the philosophical polemics of Lenin dating from the time prior to the Revolution (in the complete edition of his works, collected under the title “Materialism and Empiriocriticism”) are quite on the level of bourgeois materialism; which, of course, is quite natural since his struggle in Russia was directed against the same sort of opponents. The propaganda in Russia was distinguished from that of western Europe only in the circumstance that it was waged with still more primitive arguments and cruder instruments, because it was directed against a still more barbarous superstition. The procedure has, of course, been described before: the muzhik’s understanding of the arguments based on natural science is rather limited; but he sees and hears these godless ones direct the fiercest sort of attacks against God, give utterance to the most terrible blasphemies, — and no flash of lightning from heaven strikes the evil-doers. That proves to him that God doesn’t exist, or at any rate doesn’t care about what people do here below. And so he draws his conclusions: he lets the priest go hungry, converts the cross into kindling wood and the church into a stable, hangs pictures of Marx and Lenin in his room and perhaps burns candles to them. The younger generation, however, takes up with the youth groups which educate themselves in national economy and natural science, and it takes over Materialism as a recognized and matter-of-course doctrine. In Russia a new generation is growing up, and has been growing up a sufficient number of years to form a new stratum of adults to whom religion is only an historical phenomenon, a superstition of elderly people belonging to the past. The russian Church has gone under with Czarism.”
 
I have seen hundreds of photos of life inside Germany during the war. And in the field. Crosses marked all graves.
That is not surprising, since Christianity would have remained the main religion (at least on a cultural level) for ordinary people who were not particularly interested in Nazi ideology.
I recall one military funeral where high-ranking German officers were at a gravesite. The Union Jack was held over the grave.
Do you mean that this was a funeral held in Nazi Germany for a British soldier who had either been killed in action or died as a prisoner of war?
 
Seems to cover anything from the literallly “a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle” group (a distinct minority), to any woman who dares ask for equal opportunity in the workplace
To be honest…while I believe men and women need each other equally, I always found that phrase wasn’t as triggering as it should be.

I always thought it just meant that women don’t need a boyfriend or a husband. Which technically, is true. Same goes for men and a girlfriend/wife.

Then I started seeing people refuting this with stuff like ‘men built that apartment complex you’re living in’
 
Good grief. The last time I heard that was over 50 years ago.
In most of the United States, you’d only hear it in the context of the military. Some parts of the South still use sir and ma’am more commonly, though.
 
No need to go back in time.

A trip to some parts of the world is all that’s needed.
 
Occasionally I am addressed as “Sir”, by a shop assistant or someone , and while I think politeness is very much to be encouraged, it always makes me think “He/She clearly reckons I’m almost incredibly ancient and need delicate handling”, which is depressing. 🙂
 
Regarding you last question, yes. Whoever it was was buried with full military honors.
 
Your assumption has no merit. Civilized people will be civil, including using polite forms of address.
 
Looking at your post, I could come to no other conclusion.
I think reading with common sense comes into play here, Ed. When you’re talking about patterns of speech in a group of 300 million people, it’s implicit that you’re speaking generally, not making a literal categorical statement.

I mean, you could probably find some non-zero number of people who speak fluent Klingon, but they’re not significant enough to factor into a general statement about modern American English.
 
Last edited:
If fewer women choose to pursue the study of medicine because they decide against the long hours that could interfere and raising their families, that should remain there choice.
Why is that different for women than for men? Or are you making the assumption that women should stay home and raise families while men go out to work?

I think you’re already, in your mind at least, depriving women of equal opportunities.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top