I am grateful to Japhy for her
[his
] post helping us to see all of the actual background. However brief the statement, what was the result of this Synod’s comment and deliberation? While there was expression of concern from a ‘few’ and rightfully so, I have seen no official document or encyclical incorporating this concern into a solid directive.
As for documentation of a higher caliber, the Synod produced a list of
Propositiones (i.e.
propositions). Proposition 29 (“Eucharist and Means of Social Communication”) made the following suggestion to the Pope: “The liturgy must be devout and invite to prayer because it celebrates the paschal mystery. The
liturgical norms of the Church
must always be observed, value must be given to the sacred signs, attention must be given to the artistic expression of the place, objects and liturgical vestments.
It is necessary to ensure that the singing and music correspond to the mystery celebrated and to the liturgical time.” That might not sound like much to you. But the result of the Synod was the Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation
Sacramentum Caritatis!
Respect for the liturgical books and the richness of signs
40. Emphasizing the importance of the
ars celebrandi also leads to an appreciation of the value of the liturgical norms. The
ars celebrandi should
foster a sense of the sacred …
Perhaps we take it for granted that our ecclesial communities already know and appreciate these resources, but this is not always the case. … Equally important for a correct
ars celebrandi is an
attentiveness to the various kinds of language that the liturgy employs: words and music, gestures and silence, movement, the liturgical colours of the vestments. … The simplicity of its gestures and the sobriety of its orderly sequence of signs communicate and
inspire more than any contrived and inappropriate additions.
Attentiveness and fidelity to the specific structure of the rite express both a recognition of the nature of Eucharist as a gift and, on the part of the minister, a docile openness to receiving this ineffable gift.
Liturgical song
42. In the
ars celebrandi, liturgical song has a pre-eminent place. Saint Augustine rightly says in a famous sermon that “the new man sings a new song. Singing is an expression of joy and, if we consider the matter, an expression of love”. The People of God assembled for the liturgy sings the praises of God. In the course of her two-thousand-year history,
the Church has created, and still creates, music and songs which represent a rich patrimony of faith and love.
This heritage must not be lost. Certainly as far as the liturgy is concerned,
we cannot say that one song is as good as another. Generic improvisation or the introduction of musical genres which fail to respect the meaning of the liturgy should be avoided. As an element of the liturgy, song should be
well integrated into the overall celebration.
Consequently everything – texts, music, execution – ought to correspond to the meaning of the mystery being celebrated, the structure of the rite and the liturgical seasons. {Cf.
Propositio 29}
Finally, while respecting various styles and different and highly praiseworthy traditions, I desire, in accordance with the request advanced by the Synod Fathers, that Gregorian chant be suitably esteemed and employed as the chant proper to the Roman liturgy.
And before anyone jumps up and says “… the
chant proper to the Roman liturgy”, let me remind you that the official Latin version of
Sacramentum Caritatis uses the phrase “
Cantus liturgicus” for the heading of paragraph 42 (translated as “Liturgical song”) and uses the phrase “
cantui liturgiae Romanae proprio” at the end of that paragraph (translated as “the chant proper to the Roman liurgy”. The same word (
cantus/
cantui) means both “chant” and “song”. Given the similarity of expression, the dual meaning, and the support of translations of the exhortation into other languages, the Pope is saying that Gregorian chant is the proper liturgical song when it comes to the Roman Rite.