Shouldn't we kneel during the consecration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathy17
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I am serious as a heart attack! Someone would have to KILL me to stop me from kneeling during the consecration … … before my Lord and Savior!!

Respectfully, Pookie.
 
I believe we should always give heed to the traditions as they are handed down to us.

Here is an interesting article on the value of kneeling by an EO priest (he also references a work by another EO priest on the same subject).

dneoca.org/articles/responsekneel0795.html

I really like the article. I appreciate the distinction he makes between kneeling as a sign of penitence for sinfulness, on the one hand, and kneeling as a sign of humility before the Lord of the universe, on the other. With that distinction, the ancient canon against kneeling during Liturgy does not really seem to apply.

Here is an article by an Indian Orthodox on the Holy Qurbono as it relates to kneeling:
one-christ.blogspot.com/2008/04/kneeling-during-holy-qurbana.html

A saying common among Copts is that kneeling is the most powerful position on earth before the Lord.

Blessings

P.S. I also don’t think that Mother Angelica meant anything disrespectful by what she stated. Her statement could be taken to mean “I have heard that is what Easterns do; this is the way we Westerns do it.” I’ll give her the benefit of the doubt.🙂
 
I am serious as a heart attack! Someone would have to KILL me to stop me from kneeling during the consecration … … before my Lord and Savior!!

Respectfully, Pookie.
And with all due respect; either you have not read the entire posts, or you have said that the rules that the Church makes don’t apply to you, and you will determine what is correct and what is not.

We are not discussing going to a Roman rite Mass where there are no kneelers and the parish stands during the Consecration. We are discussing one of the Eastern rites, and the Church has seen fit to enact rubrics which are differrent from the Roman rite.

If your comment is that in the Roman rite Mass you would kneel no matter what, that is perfectly correct. But if your comment is that you would kneel during the Consecration at a Byzantine rite Consecration, you are in essence saying that you feel that you have the right to defy the Church’s rules.

You might want to re-read the OP to see if you are answering the question posed, or simply jumping in without considering the nature of the thread.
 
otjm:

I’m pretty sure Mother Angelica wasn’t talking about Eastern Rite Catholics, or trying to say how they should worship. I’ve never heard her talk about how Eastern Rite Catholics worship, except to say that the Divine Liturgies are beautiful, reverent & full of “godly fear” (That was on one occasions in the 5 years I’ve watched EWTN). What she has talked about on many occasions are how many Roman (Western Rite) Catholics display an utter lack of reverence and awe towards OLGS Jesus Christ present in the Blessed Sacrament and especially during the Consecration of HIS Body & Blood.

I’ve heard her talk about this before, and she’s always added the caveat that what she had to say didn’t apply to, “Eastern Rite Catholics who almost always display far more reverence for our Lord Jesus than most Roman Catholics do nowadays.” If she didn’t add the caveat this time, it’s because she added it so many times before & just got tired of having to repeat the obvious every time she repeated this.I would hope you are correct. I have heard criticisms of her, some of which are obviously based on “I don’t like her”; however, others were more to the point that she occasionally made statements that were, perhaps, not the wisest. One did not have to hunt to figure out what her opinion was, but some people have taken her opinon to be more than just an opinion.
Traditional Ang;5453604:
Regarding Catholic Schools – What Mother Angelica & others have said has been backed up with Statistics - A Young Adult who attends a normal Catholic College is 3x as likely to lose his or her faith than a Young Adult who attends a Secular College. and, It was even worse when she made her comments (in the late 1980’s) than it is now…

I could tell you stories about the Campus Ministry of the Catholic university I attended in the late 1970’s that would, “Cause the hairs on your head to stand on end as a frightened porcupine.” and, That includes INVALID MASSES where the Body & Blood of Christ were NOT CONFECTED!

And, There’s always the tragic exchange I heard between a Catholic Father who sent his children to a famous Catholic university and a JEWISH Talk Show Host. Listening to a Jewish Talk Show Host commiserating with this Catholic father about how his children, who had been brought up in a faithful Catholic home, lost their faith as they attended this “Catholic” university was heartwarming and tragic.

Maybe old Great, Grandma isn’t as clueless as you thought she was.

Your Brother in Christ, Michael
I would be curious to see the statistics, or at least the source, and what time period they represent. It is not so much questionsing you, as seeing what they say. The only source I have currently is from CARA, and I do not have information that they have ever done a study post-college that separates out, for example, Mass attendance (which is used to indicate adherence to Catholicism) post college sorted by Catholic College and non-Catholic college.

What Cara does show is that in the age group of 18 - 30, attendance is 21% attending weekly; 31 - 43 is 22% attending weekly (2004 poll). This does not sort out even those who attended any college from those who went no more than high school.

And a lot of water has gone udner the bridge since the 1970’s; the early 1970’s were the time of most experimentation liturgically. Things have gotten back to a much more even keel since then.
 
I could tell you stories about the Campus Ministry of the Catholic university I attended in the late 1970’s that would, “Cause the hairs on your head to stand on end as a frightened porcupine.” and, That includes INVALID MASSES where the Body & Blood of Christ were NOT CONFECTED!

**There are only 4 things that make a mass invalid:
  1. Lack of proper minister (priest or bishop).
  2. Lack of proper intention (this is hard to prove).
  3. Lack of proper form (mangling the accepted Words of Consecration so they do NOT refer to the Body and Blood of Christ).
  4. Lack of proper matter (wheat bread and pure grape wine).
Which one or ones of these happened at the invalid masses you’re talking about?**
 
I could tell you stories about the Campus Ministry of the Catholic university I attended in the late 1970’s that would, “Cause the hairs on your head to stand on end as a frightened porcupine.” and, That includes INVALID MASSES where the Body & Blood of Christ were NOT CONFECTED!

**There are only 4 things that make a mass invalid:
  1. Lack of proper minister (priest or bishop).
  2. Lack of proper intention (this is hard to prove).
  3. Lack of proper form (mangling the accepted Words of Consecration so they do NOT refer to the Body and Blood of Christ).
  4. Lack of proper matter (wheat bread and pure grape wine).
Which one or ones of these happened at the invalid masses you’re talking about?**
Want to bet it was #4?
 
Oh yeah … The old chips & coke fests. I remember them well. 😦

Also possible that #3 was mixed-in there as well. Seen that too.
As goofy as Oregon is, I have never seen either, but that does not convince me they never happened. It is sad that enthusiasm succeeded in overcoming common sense.

A good portion of what happened in that “free-fall off the end of the earth” interestingly was done by priests who were ordained pre-Vatican 2.
 
I am serious as a heart attack! Someone would have to KILL me to stop me from kneeling during the consecration … … before my Lord and Savior!!

Respectfully, Pookie.
THen stay out of the Eastern Catholic parishes, where, generally, doing so is considered an act of sorrow, not of reverence.
 
Here is an article and a response which seems to have been published in an OCA publication. I don’t see any dates for when that was. I think it’s very worth reading both articles together. Fr. Gisetti brings up some interesting food for thought in the section where he speaks of kneeling in the context of “The vast majority of Orthodox Christians attend church only on Sundays…” I think his point there connects with Father Koblosh’s observation that “At Sunday Liturgy, all preparation expressed by kneeling and prostrating comes to fulfillment, and so we stand. The ‘fast’ is fulfilled as it resolves itself into ‘feast.’ The Lord is coming! The Lord is yet to come! But there, where the Church assembles on the Day of the Lord, the Lord comes! And He is made known to her in the ‘breaking of the bread’.”

I find useful that image from Father Koblosh: "The ‘fast’ is fulfilled as it resolves itself into ‘feast.’ ", kneeling and fasting as both penitential in preparation for the Resurrection of the Lord every Sunday. I’m not persuaded by a number of Fr. Gisetti’s arguments but I think all his points are quite useful to consider.
 
Here is an article and a response which seems to have been published in an OCA publication. I don’t see any dates for when that was. I think it’s very worth reading both articles together…
I see mardukm in #41 referenced these articles already. Sorry I missed that… I’m not doing well at keeping up with the few threads I’m watching… (And there is a date referenced for the first article, April 1995, by Fr. Gisetti in his response.)
I believe we should always give heed to the traditions as they are handed down to us.

Here is an interesting article on the value of kneeling by an EO priest (he also references a work by another EO priest on the same subject).

dneoca.org/articles/responsekneel0795.html

I really like the article. I appreciate the distinction he makes between kneeling as a sign of penitence for sinfulness, on the one hand, and kneeling as a sign of humility before the Lord of the universe, on the other. With that distinction, the ancient canon against kneeling during Liturgy does not really seem to apply.
 
Glory to Jesus Christ!
no kneeling? huh? I attended a few Greek Orthodox Divine Liturgys through out the years ( I have many Orthodox friends). We kneeled. The pews even had kneelers just like the Roman churches do.:confused:
So, today I was at the local Greek Orthodox Cathedral, or proto-cathedral, because His Eminence Metropolitan Gerasimos was visiting for a special memorial service following DL. I’ve gone to this church occasionally on various feasts and funerals over many decades but not sure I’ve ever been to a Sunday DL before. To my surprise all but about 4 people, maybe there were a few more behind me who I obviously couldn’t see, dropped down to the kneelers at the epiklesis. When in Rome… well, since there were in fact folks who didn’t kneel I remained with them standing, in a “deep bow” as I’m used to. Had everyone knelt I would have also.
Those modernist Greeks have pipe organs too! 😉
Yes, OhMalley, they have one 🙂

They also sat a lot, but in those instances His Eminence motioned people to sit, so I have no idea what their norm is for that.

Last Sunday I had the joy of being part of Mass at an Assyrian Chaldean Catholic Church where about half the parish knelt and half stood. I understand that this is a parish that was created when 2 churches came together so I’m guessing who stands and who kneels may be partly a factor of which church/tradition they came from before combining.

This has been a very interesting thread for me and has in fact made me more uncomfortable kneeling on Sundays in my home Roman rite parish. I go to daily Mass so in a sense I get the week to prepare as Fr. Koblosh talked about it in his article: "At Sunday Liturgy, all preparation expressed by kneeling and prostrating comes to fulfillment, and so we stand. The ‘fast’ is fulfilled as it resolves itself into ‘feast.’ " Leaving the Greek church today I heard several people around me commenting to each other that they hadn’t “been to church” for weeks (“so hard to get going… tired from work… rather stay home” as they said to each other). Maybe their priest read Fr. Gisetti’s article and decided to go with kneeling…🙂
 
I was watching an old episide of Mother Angelica on EWTN tonight and she had a call from a Roman Catholic who had a question about whether or not he should have knelt during the consecration.

She said she knows that people stand in the Byzantine Rite, but that it shouldn’t be a question of rubrics. That if we believe that Our Lord is truly present before us, body and blood, soul and divinity, that we should kneel before him.

She makes an awfully good point and I’m thinking I should start kneeling at tomorrow’s Divine Liturgy. What do you think?
I’m w/ ya! 👍
 
I was watching an old episide of Mother Angelica on EWTN tonight and she had a call from a Roman Catholic who had a question about whether or not he should have knelt during the consecration.

She said she knows that people stand in the Byzantine Rite, but that it shouldn’t be a question of rubrics. That if we believe that Our Lord is truly present before us, body and blood, soul and divinity, that we should kneel before him.

She makes an awfully good point and I’m thinking I should start kneeling at tomorrow’s Divine Liturgy. What do you think?
Gabriel of 12;
Philippians 2:Have among yourselves the same attitude that is also yours in Christ Jesus,
Who, 3** though he was in the form of God, **did not regard equality with God something to be grasped. 4
7
Rather, he emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, coming in human likeness; 5 and found human in appearance,
8
he humbled himself, becoming obedient to death, even death on a cross. 6
9
Because of this, **God greatly exalted him and bestowed on him the name 7 that is above every name, **
10
**that at the name of Jesus every knee should bend, 8 of those in heaven and on earth and under the earth, **
11
and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, 9 to the glory of God the Father.
 
Gabriel of 12;
Philippians 2:Have among yourselves the same attitude that is also yours in Christ Jesus,
Who, 3** though he was in the form of God, **did not regard equality with God something to be grasped. 4
7
Rather, he emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, coming in human likeness; 5 and found human in appearance,
8
he humbled himself, becoming obedient to death, even death on a cross. 6
9
Because of this, **God greatly exalted him and bestowed on him the name 7 that is above every name, **
10
that at the name of Jesus every knee should bend, 8 of those in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11
and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, 9 to the glory of God the Father.
Read the canons of Nicea and bugger off! It’s not a matter for you to interpret. :mad:
 
Read the canons of Nicea and bugger off! It’s not a matter for you to interpret. :mad:
Gabriel of 12;

Forgive me, if Scripture has offended you? I was showing that the Roman latin rite follows the scriptural Tradition by Kneeling as the above scripture indicates.

If your rite prefers to stand at the name of Jesus when he is present in your liturgy God bless you. What I would like to clarify here, is that posture is very important in worship.

From the Latin Rite we prefer to show our reference of worship by kneeling before Jesus Christ’s presence. If you culture displays great reference and worship in the posture of standing God bless you, I do not protest your reverence, I respect it very much because it displays your faithfullness by standing, which is by some cultural standards the highest reverence one can give to God. But according to my culture and Latin Rite which follows the Tradition of the Scripture practice is my highest posture of reference before Jesus Christ presence. I dont see any problem with standing or Kneeling as long as reference is believed and practiced from these postures. So I dont have a problem with the canon.

Peace be with you:)
 
=Gabriel of 12;5983226]Gabriel of 12;
Philippians 2:Have among yourselves the same attitude that is also yours in Christ Jesus,
Who, 3** though he was in the form of God, **did not regard equality with God something to be grasped. 4
7
Rather, he emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, coming in human likeness; 5 and found human in appearance,
8
he humbled himself, becoming obedient to death, even death on a cross. 6
9
Because of this, **God greatly exalted him and bestowed on him the name 7 that is above every name, **
10
that at the name of Jesus every knee should bend, 8 of those in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11
and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, 9 to the glory of God the Father.
The answer to the OPQ is YES:thumbsup:

From the current GRIM which controls and detrrmines actions durring Mss with Rome’s Approval.
  1. The faithful should stand from the beginning of the Entrance chant, or while the priest approaches the altar, until the end of the Collect; for the Alleluia chant before the Gospel; while the Gospel itself is proclaimed; during the Profession of Faith and the Prayer of the Faithful; from the invitation, Orate, fratres (Pray, brethren), before the prayer over the offerings until the end of Mass, except at the places indicated below.
They should, however, sit while the readings before the Gospel and the responsorial Psalm are proclaimed and for the homily and while the Preparation of the Gifts at the Offertory is taking place; and, as circumstances allow, they may sit or kneel while the period of sacred silence after Communion is observed.

In the dioceses of the United States of America, they should kneel beginning after the singing or recitation of the Sanctus until after the Amen of the Eucharistic Prayer, except when prevented on occasion by reasons of health, lack of space, the large number of people present, or some other good reason. Those who do not kneel ought to make a profound bow when the priest genuflects after the consecration. The faithful kneel after the Agnus Dei unless the Diocesan Bishop determines otherwise.53
 
Gabriel of 12;

Forgive me, if Scripture has offended you? I was showing that the Roman latin rite follows the scriptural Tradition by Kneeling as the above scripture indicates.

If your rite prefers to stand at the name of Jesus when he is present in your liturgy God bless you. What I would like to clarify here, is that posture is very important in worship.

From the Latin Rite we prefer to show our reference of worship by kneeling before Jesus Christ’s presence. If you culture displays great reference and worship in the posture of standing God bless you, I do not protest your reverence, I respect it very much because it displays your faithfullness by standing, which is by some cultural standards the highest reverence one can give to God. But according to my culture and Latin Rite which follows the Tradition of the Scripture practice is my highest posture of reference before Jesus Christ presence. I dont see any problem with standing or Kneeling as long as reference is believed and practiced from these postures. So I dont have a problem with the canon.

Peace be with you:)
So what you’re saying is that the Council of Nicea was in error?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top