blackforest
Well-known member
It is disgusting, vile, and exploitative to take a stock photo of an abused child to use as a human mascot for what is ultimately the cause of abortion for any time and any reason.
Yes, a lot more than legislation needs to be changed, but that needs to be changed too.You dodge the issue. Fine and understandable as you know as well as I that a whole lot more than legislation needs to be changed.
May 16
and yet no one seems to have a problem with sending a mother to jail if she kills her two day old infant.Jimbo:
I’m totally on board with that. I get it. I struggled with the ‘if a baby is declared a person than a mother could go to jail’ aspect.
I totally agree with you that men should be obligated to provide support for women carrying their child. However, no matter who I am or what relation I have to the subject, my opinion is valid if my logic is.Because it’s not the man’s body. And frankly the way our society treats pregnancy the man has no responsibility until after the baby is born. Until men are legally obligated to provide support the moment women are forced to legally proceed with the pregnancy (their wishes be damned), men should not have a say.