L
look3467
Guest
You are correct in all that you have said, of which I am in no way against any of it.AJ, on this thread we are debating the sufficiency of Scriptures. I believe the debate on whether baptism is required for salvation is a good example of this debate for Scripture can apparantly lead to different answers. That is why I asked for Scripture to back up your statement that it is a public display.
By various church traditions I have heard of this but there is no Scripture to support this and if you believe as I do that our life should be based on Scripture, it is important not to accept a mans’ tradition but to have, as Scripture teaches, 2 or 3 witnesses to back up our belief.
For much of my life I blindly followed a church tradition. When I found my spiritual life lacking I turned to Scripture and elders who teach Scriptures to center my life on Jesus. That was 21 years ago and that premise has saved me in a number of ways.
I get the Gospel, I received Jesus as the foundation of my salvation according to Eph 2:8-9 and other Scriptures. So by faith I am born again. However, Heb 6:1-3 talks about growing from elementary teachings, such as baptism, and grow to maturity.
I believe it is fair to say then that without baptism we cannot mature and maturity is lacking in the body of Christ. Without the understanding of baptism and submitting to it, we cannot keep growing according to Scripture. Of course there are other reasons for lack of growth but baptism is an elementary principle.
Jesus said to baptize disciples, Paul was commanded to be baptized, the Ethiopian eunuch asked for it in response to Philips teaching, Paul questioned the baptism of the Ephesian elders then baptized them, and Peter said he could not withhold baptism from Cornelius and the Jews should repent and be baptized.
Again, I say that baptism is not a suggestion for the believer. I find it confusing and maybe even hypocritical when church people point to someone who has confessed Jesus but never shows up to services as one whose salvation is in doubt and this based on one scripture not to forsake the assembling together; yet, there is much more evidence on baptism but it is a toss up belief?
AJ, how can you ignore the preponderance of scripture? You still quoted me man’s tradition not Scripture. Looking forward to your reply.
What I wanted to point out, is that the scriptures are sufficient to point out what the needs of an unbeliever are with respect to God.
The purpose and intend of the coming of Jesus was to save that which was lost.
The lost are those who lived and died, are still living today, and all those who have not yet being added to the heavenly rolls (unborn yet) that Jesus came to save.
That is the primary importance was to convert the soul, to renew it again of a heavenly source, being lost to the spirit of the living God.
Baptism was brought into the mix as an after effect, or as a manifestation of the inward renewal, where the renewal had already taken place and the baptism being only a confirmation.
Now, if one should say that Baptism is essential for salvation is not true, because the conversion of the soul has to be done first.
The conversion of the soul or rebirth takes place in the state of consciences, meaning understanding the consequences of it, from one state to another.
That is why knowledge (fruit) of the tree of life is essential in understanding before a conversion of mind, body and soul can take place.
Baptism is the first step towards that goal.
Blessings, AJ