J
JKirkLVNV
Guest
I just found out about that last night, watching EWTN (The Journey Home) when Fr. Benedict Groeschel mentioned it. It kind of blew my mind.That’s what I would say. I wonder what JKIRK meant?
I just found out about that last night, watching EWTN (The Journey Home) when Fr. Benedict Groeschel mentioned it. It kind of blew my mind.That’s what I would say. I wonder what JKIRK meant?
Found out about what?I just found out about that last night, watching EWTN (The Journey Home) when Fr. Benedict Groeschel mentioned it. It kind of blew my mind.
That St. Teresa prayed for the repose of Judas’s soul.Found out about what?
I dont get that impression from the article. And even if it is a one-time thing, think about the effects of this- the traditional Stations of the Corss wouldnt anger anyone or cause controversy, but this sure is.Caesar: I don’t think it’s an official change! I think it was just a one time deal. I wouldn’t get excited over this.
Well, I wouldn’t like it either, but I don’t think we should take the word of the secular press on this. The stations were different on the different Good Friday’s of Pope John Paul II’s reign and nothing changed for the whole of the Church.I dont get that impression from the article. And even if it is a one-time thing, think about the effects of this- the traditional Stations of the Corss wouldnt anger anyone or cause controversy, but this sure is.
She must have been to put up with him.That St. Teresa prayed for the repose of Judas’s soul.
Did you also know that Pilates wife was reckoned a saint by the Eastern Orthodox (St. Claudia Procula). I thought that was interesting.
With all due respect to the late Pontiff, there are some things from his reign that should have died with him.Well, I wouldn’t like it either, but I don’t think we should take the word of the secular press on this. The stations were different on the different Good Friday’s of Pope John Paul II’s reign and nothing changed for the whole of the Church.
With all due respect to the late Pontiff, there are some things from his reign that should have died with him.Well, I wouldn’t like it either, but I don’t think we should take the word of the secular press on this. The stations were different on the different Good Friday’s of Pope John Paul II’s reign and nothing changed for the whole of the Church.
That’s a subjective opinion, Caesar, and one to which you are certainly entitled, but subjective nonetheless. Our current pope has spent a great deal of time lauding him. AND John Paul II DIDN’T change the Stations, yet you all seem to think Benedict WILL, on rather flimsy evidence.With all due respect to the late Pontiff, there are some things from his reign that should have died with him.
I agreeWith all due respect to the late Pontiff, there are some things from his reign that should have died with him.
So Mons. Farasi and the Pope are revoluntionaries, and they’re out to destroy the Church? Is that actually what you’re saying?No one said will-nilly. Revolutionaries ALWAYS have a serious reason.
To wit:
To destroy a Religion, you must first sever its traditions.
St. Isidore: Do you believe that Benedict XVI, John Paul II, John Paul I, Paul VI, and/or Blessed John XXIII were legitimate, valid popes? Any or all of them? Which of them?I agree
It seems that the wrecking ball has only begun. Who knows how many more changes are to occur.Does EVERYTHING demand change? Is it not enough that the Mass, and the Rites for the Sacraments, and the Divine Office, and inumerable prayers and litanies, and the Liturgical Calendar, and Holy Days of Obligations, and God knows what else had to be changed?
Ooooh, I’m steamed now…
But we gotta go along with that wrecking ball of the spirit of Vatican II, dont we? Where to next? Hmmm, some of those Marian Dogmas are lookin’ a little too extra-biblical if you ask me- gotta be ecumenical now, unite ourselves with our protestant brothers and sisters, appease the liberals and the heretics…
And more and more I am starting to see why the SSPX has so many problems with the Church today…
Perhaps this sums up the unneccessary kerfuffle around this article and in this thread:This is what disturbs me most of all. It seems to be ignoring Sacred Tradition and that is what separates us from the Protestants
Is that ANY of your business, Vegas? Stick to the topic please, this isn’t a sedevacantist witch hunt.St. Isidore: Do you believe that Benedict XVI, John Paul II, John Paul I, Paul VI, and/or Blessed John XXIII were legitimate, valid popes? Any or all of them? Which of them?
Amen.With all due respect to the late Pontiff, there are some things from his reign that should have died with him.
Come again? What do you actually mean?It seems that the wrecking ball has only begun. Who knows how many more changes are to occur.