Soteriology; I had to look that one up, Father. I am not saying that Mary is more, only that she is a partner, set up by her son in the business of saving souls. There is no question that she has brought me closer to Jesus Christ her son. This is not problematic.
I would also like to point out that I would very much like to pray the Liturgy of the Hours, but I would need instruction on how to do it properly. Even then, I do not know if I could properly pray it within my busy day. The Rosary, on the other hand, is easy to pray and requested of me by Our Lady of Lourdes. As you have been so attached to Mary as you have said, I do not understand your objections to my posts.
It is wonderful that Our Lady has brought you closer to Jesus. We see this beautifully depicted in the Gospel, as she presents Him to the shepherds and magi, who find Jesus in Mary’s arms. Many find Jesus through Mary. Of course, there are also other experiences…the woman at the well in Samaria. Or the Twelve. Each of these also foreshadow how souls encounter the Lord Jesus for the first time.
I have a very deep love for Our Lady. She has had, has, and (I trust) will always have a singular and unique place in my life and ministry. By God’s gift, I’ve had many special opportunities related to Our Lady in the life of the Church over the decades. In the years I was a professor, I enjoyed teaching Mariology…be it the course I wrote or when I would give an individual lecture on a topic in Mariology.
That said, I wrote what I wrote in this thread because there needed at moments to be a theological clarification on a point that simply could not be left unqualified when a theologian was looking on…on points others also expressed concern, wonderment and, at times, dismay.
The admonition of the Council Fathers in
Lumen Gentium was precise to theologians, preachers and all the faithful: that the expressions of Marian piety and devotion had to be “within the limits of sound and orthodox doctrine” and devoid of “gross exaggeration”.
This was not said by over 2000 bishops gathered in ecumenical council without reason and purpose. In the course of the centuries, there have been images and expressions that the Church heard that she has said are not well considered or could be misapplied or convey ideas beyond the mind of the Church…and this especially in later centuries concerning the Blessed Virgin. This isn’t the place to go into some of the more remarkable theories & expressions of, for example, the late middle ages. I’ll leave that to the classroom when it can be contextualised and where students have (one hopes) the solid ground work of fundamental theology & rudimentary philosophy.
I’m in no way attacking you and I’m sorry if you perceive that I am; that is not my intention.
I venture that every Catholic, if they’ve reached a certain minimum age, has asked Mary at some point in their lives to pray for them at the hour of their death. Many do it every day. There’s no doubt that, in such a critical and definitive moment, the prayers of the Mother of Jesus will be a most precious treasure to each of us as we depart this life. Asking her prayers for that moment above all is a commendable thing to do.
One has to be careful however, for theology’s sake, in employing images which convey a greater interest on the part of Mary in a soul reaching Heaven than of Jesus. Or that Mary has a greater capacity for mercy, compassion, and understanding than God Himself. Theologically, I can explain what underlies the image, popular in certain schools of spirituality (notably the French) and among certain famous preachers in Church history. It’s an evocative image, if very carefully and judiciously applied, that can speak to us on an existential level of balancing justice and mercy. But it is an image that is a tenuous one since it can be misunderstood or extended in very detrimental ways
The Second Person of the Trinity assumed a perfect human nature in the mystery of the Incarnation, in the womb of the Virgin Mary. He lived among us as a man. He taught us by word and example. He instituted the sacraments. He founded the Church. He gave us His Mother as a spiritual entrustment…she to us and we to her.
More than that: As the Saviour and Redeemer, He died for us. As St. Thomas Aquinas says, in His death, because He is God, He could die for each and every individual…from Adam & Eve to the last man & woman in human history. As God in human flesh, He knew each of them. He knew each and every sin that His death was atoning for. The love of God is infinite. The mercy of God is infinite. The knowledge of God is omniscient. God is love. Mary is utterly singular as a human person…but she is a human person. She is not God.
I am more grateful to Our Lady for her prayers, her love and her presence in my life than I could begin to write. But…I am more indebted to God than I am to Mary. He is the author of my salvation. He is my Creator. He is my Redeemer. He is my Sanctifier. He is my God and my All. He is the One who created Our Lady and put her into my life. Theological precision cannot be sacrificed to imagery that ill expresses the truth it is trying to illuminate. And in the expressive language we employ, we must be careful that truth is not obfuscated.
I am not trying to discourage you from your Marian devotion. But theology also requires me to step in for the sake of those troubled by expressions that seem, to them, out of proportion.
A final point…the rosary is a perfectly wonderful devotion. There is no need for regret that it can be more and better integrated into your prayer life than the Liturgy of the Hours. It is for that reason that the rosary has existed, continues to exist and will always exist “in this valley of tears”. It seems well suited to nourish your spiritual life and your relationship to the Divine Trinity and to Our Lady.