Was never said. Straw Man # 85.
…
That was a joke. Hence the “

” smiley face. People need to lighten up sometimes.
Which is what those who criticize decent clothing are doing.

I’m not the one doing the labeling, sir. You are.
Actually, I’m merely responding to the labelling. You don’t have to have a PhD to figure out what people are insinuating.
Then you and I are not reading the same Catholic Answers forum. Because sure they have. On this thread alone you only need to get to the 3rd post to see someone complain about the "parade of **jeans, short-sleeves and/or t-shirts **.
Jeans are denim pants and shirts have sleeves.
Not to mention that every single thread of CAF that has to do with clothing has a sizeable number of people making the same pronunciations (I have not looked enough to say which side is the “majority”, which is why I’m using “sizeable” instead. I’m trying to be accurate instead of facetious because just as many people will jump on me for that). This is a very conservative Catholic forums, it’s not hard to guess where the thread is going to go.
- What are you referring to with the “why” in the equation?
Why are these extra clothes needed at all?
- Can you please be more specific with what “terrible” means?
Plastic bags fall apart easily (duh). Also, they’d be less secure on a large campus.
- Why is the comparison unrealistic?
Some people would sell their own mother for $100. Number 2, nothing like that would ever happen so it’s a stupid hypothetical (I’m guessing you’re an arts major. I’m an engineering major. I deal in things that are real, not hypothetical).
Some priests might not have a problem with it. But some probably are too scared that people will get so sensitive (you, and others in this thread) when it is suggested they wont dress better that they won’t come back to Mass,which they obviously don’t want. So don’t take the absence of criticism to = their approval. That’s also a logical fallacy, I’m sure you’re aware: If A then B. ~ A, therefore ~ B.
Ok, it is one thing to go against me, but it is a totally different thing to insult several priests. I demand an apology, and this is against forum rules. How dare you call several great priests cowards.
Also, a priest I know would sometimes just attend Mass (not a concelebrate) in more casual clothes then me (he is an excellent priest). I wouldn’t call that “absence of criticism”. Point = not well taken.
It’s surprising that simply advocating a person to do something that would require a bit of effort and planning is met with some vitriol
Vitriol? You sound like someone who has plenty of experience in playing the victim.
But surely you can dress more nicely for Sunday Masses, right?
Yes, because the only thing I’m going to is Sunday Mass and I clear my schedule around it as best I can, and I have time to go and change back after. I upgrade to one of my less ugly collar shirts usually (serious question: why are all collared shirts plain ugly?).
Does the congregation kneel during the consecration? I’m also curious, will you decribe what your parish’s main Crucifix looks like? Is it abstract, or realistic for example.
No kneelers at our chapel, most people (at daily Mass) still kneel for the Consecration (this is in Canada also mind you).