It should be no one’s right to open carry an AK-47 into a neighborhood restaurant or bar. It’s quite ridiculous. Gun Control does not mean taking away guns, it’s common sense in making background checks mandatory with no loopholes. Once you pass the check, buy all the guns you want.
Who gave you the right to decide what is ridiculous?
Yes, it does. They cant confiscate your guns if they don’t have a list of owners and that is EXACTLY what happened in Louisiana during Katrina when the cops were sent to seize peoples guns. EVERY gun confiscation for the last 120 years was preceded by gun registration.
A one time background check? Well, seems we agree on something.
You will be pleased to know then that one is not allowed to carry an AK-47 or any automatic weapon any place in the US .
So why has Mitt Romney, George Bush and all the Republican candidates for presidency made a big deal for taking out the 14th amendment of the Constitution and getting it overturned. They are doing it because of what it is, simply put, it is killing the babies.
The people who did the marches here in the DFW area were carrying automatic rifles, and if im not mistaken AK47s. This is the local Fox affiliate.
They were carrying scary looking guns but they were neither AK-47s nor automatics
Not sure what you mean by this, could you elaborate? The 14th amendment was passed after the civil war-- mostly in reaction to the way the southern governments were treating the newly freed slaves. Particularly abhorrent to the congress debating passing the 14th amendment were the gun laws which the southern states had passed disarming blacks and making the vulnerable to abuse by both government and the KKK.
Well those guns that you saw on that link which is true, you cannot argue that it was made up, are not to be carried around in public. What these individuals above all was to intimadate, but they used the 2nd ammendment as a cover.
This is wahat I found, and it all points to the 14th ammendment.
Sure you can if you paid the ATFE licenses and fees.
Show me. Link or it doesn’t exist.
I don’t knit anything.
No, it did not. The court made up new law from nothing, arguing that a woman’s medical decisions for her body and health were outside the parameters of state control which is utter nonsense as this principle would also throw out laws against prostitution, taking illegal drugs and any number of things.
So you are saying those 2 men never said it, or you want to forget it. That is knit picking, or as we say in Spanish, you only remember what you want to remember. These are two links to Mitt Romney 2012 campaign in regards to abortion and the Constitution.Show me. Link or it doesn’t exist.
I don’t knit anything.
No, the SCOTUS decisions are all on the side of the 2nd Amendment being a personal right, just like free speech and the right to vote.
Overturning Roe V Wade has nothing to do with overturning the 14th Amendment
But what I am saying is that abortion has been made legal due to pro lifers arguing the Constitution. It is the law of the land. I’m saying, the 2nd Amendment was put in due to the threat of the British that’s why guns were allowed. Not to be parading around with a gun.
As the long time owner of weapons/magazines that fall into that category, I am very well aware of the distinction. My point wasn’t important anyway…
One can find two people who will say almost anything in either party, but that does not mean it is either representative of that party as a whole or that the establishment leadership of the party will actually do anything.
Sorry, didn’t mean any offense-- it’s just that term ‘high capacity magazines’ is a pet peeve of mine.
Me too and I don’t like the phrase ‘assault weapon’ being misused to refer to single shot nonmilitary rifles that look military.