T
Tiber_Pilgrim
Guest
Says the woman who fails to understands my point because she has already picked up a pitchfork and is ready to storm the Duggar home.Says the guys who thinks consensual sin is = to sex abuse.
Says the woman who fails to understands my point because she has already picked up a pitchfork and is ready to storm the Duggar home.Says the guys who thinks consensual sin is = to sex abuse.
A pervert is someone who acts on perversion. You can’t be a pervert and not know it, unless you have a disassociative personality. I said he should find out if he is at risk to repeat, not “if he’s a pervert.”So you are saying that he should do this for himself in case he is a pervert and doesn’t know it?
If it’s something he wants to do, then I say go for it.
I don’t think that the “government or law” should force him to.
Unfortunately, in the circles the Duggars travel in (as was very obvious in the Derek/Jill and Ben/Jessa courtships), a courtship is treated as a prelude to engagement, which is a prelude to marriage. Breaking off a courtship has a heavy social stigma, and people who do so are often stigmatized in a similar way divorcees are. Anna very well could have been afraid that if she broke off the courtship, SHE would be seen as “damaged goods” and not be able to land another husband.And what about Anna? She knew about this and still chose to continue to courtship and marry him. Was she so afraid that in HER sheltered life she’d never find a good man?
Nope. Never said that. Just that what he did was horrific and I feel sorry for the victims. Never once did I say I wanted to do anything to them or their home. Don’t put words in my mouth. You got it?Says the woman who fails to understands my point because she has already picked up a pitchfork and is ready to storm the Duggar home.
Jesus also stated that if one looks at another person lustfully, they have committed adultery in their heart and therefore it is better to pluck one’s eye out and lose that member of the body than to have the whole body thrown into hell. I think he makes pretty clear the seriousness of the sin of adultery. We never read of Jesus putting a disclaimer out there about it being between “two consenting adults”. And yet, Jesus still showed mercy to the adulteress just as he shows mercy to ALL who seek His mercy, repent, and desire to sin no more.I think it’s also telling that Jesus Himself forgave the adulteress who had sex with ADULT men, yet singled out “causing little ones to sin” as a sin worthy of death by drowning.
I don’t think it is overboard. But perhaps that did have something to do with it. Who knows. What I do know is that Jim Bob never should have let the exploitation of his kids be something that would have this become public shame. He knew that this existed and happens and he knew people would try to dig into their past and he smiled for the camera and cashed the checks anyway. The whole time early in the show Josh was the star. From his engagement to his car dealership to his marriage to Anna. You can tell that this was the Duggars pride and joy. That type of celebration of Josh is what absolutely would devastate his victims that were his sisters. Now that the info is public, it is not hard to figure out who the sisters were. And some of them have husbands now.Maybe it’s because of Josh that they go so overboard with things
“Odd” would be one word for it, but I do suspect this was one reason the Duggars covered up Josh’s actions, that they knew their daughters would be seen as “damaged goods” themselves and be less likely to land husbands.Parading your daughter out as the token virgin who has not even kissed someone or held hands but ooooops was molested and sexually assaulted by her brother seems odd now doesn’t it.
Two points:
Some posters have even essentially stated that protecting Josh from the bad conditions he would encounter in “juvie hall” or the secular justice system in general, was more important than protecting his victims from further assaults or preventing him from harming even more victims.
- I get the feeling much of Kendra’s passionate responses in support of the victims came about because so many other posters have minimized Josh’s actions, and essentially engaged in victim blaming; apparently, if someone is severely affected by being sexually abused, gets PTSD and has flashbacks and suffers from sexual dysfunction, it’s the victims fault for not being a good forgiving Christian.
“Odd” would be one word for it, but I do suspect this was one reason the Duggars covered up Josh’s actions, that they knew their daughters would be seen as “damaged goods” themselves and be less likely to land husbands.
- Second point:
Indeed, even their instructions to their daughters that they not let anyone touch them between the neck and knees, to me suggests they made the VICTIMS the primary line of defense against further assaults. Which sickens me.
If you are referring to my personal pain, no, it is not repressed. I live with it everyday. But as I mentioned before, my parents simply told me I had a wild imagination and that I must have misinterpreted something. I would explain in more detail, but it would not be appropriate for an open forum.It’s also quite possible that you’ve repressed your personal pain in a way that affects the normal horrified reaction one has to the news of the sexual abuse of a minor child by a brother. That is really not unusual for abuse victims to do.
I think that the actions need to fit the punishment. If you read the police accounts, the forcible fondling consisted of Josh touching the hole in the seat of his sister’s jeans and telling her she had a hole in her jeans. This was considered a felony because the police speculated that he touched skin. Another incident of forcible fondling consisted of him removing a blanket from his sister while she was awake. She says she thought he had just taken the blanket off and walked away. She was awake and did not realize he had touched her inappropriately as he took the blanket off.Two points:
Some posters have even essentially stated that protecting Josh from the bad conditions he would encounter in “juvie hall” or the secular justice system in general, was more important than protecting his victims from further assaults or preventing him from harming even more victims.
- I get the feeling much of Kendra’s passionate responses in support of the victims came about because so many other posters have minimized Josh’s actions, and essentially engaged in victim blaming; apparently, if someone is severely affected by being sexually abused, gets PTSD and has flashbacks and suffers from sexual dysfunction, it’s the victims fault for not being a good forgiving Christian.
“Odd” would be one word for it, but I do suspect this was one reason the Duggars covered up Josh’s actions, that they knew their daughters would be seen as “damaged goods” themselves and be less likely to land husbands.
- Second point:
Indeed, even their instructions to their daughters that they not let anyone touch them between the neck and knees, to me suggests they made the VICTIMS the primary line of defense against further assaults. Which sickens me.
To improve your understanding of what happened, you should read the actual report. A link to it has been posted to it over in a similar thread called Josh Duggar admits to molestation charges etc. in the news section of this forum. The state trooper was not a family friend. He was a Trooper who had done state inspection of the cars at the Duggars used car dealership. It was not the Duggar’s fault that he chose not to pursue and investigation. Josh Dugger was sent over 200 miles away to a Christian Ministry program. The father said he thought Josh was receiving counseling and hard labor.Della, it is my understanding that the “counseling” received by Josh involved being sent away to an acquaintance for a year of intense physical labor, and a stern talking-to by a family friend who was a state trooper, who never reported the molestation as he had been required to do, and who is now jailed - yet again - as a child pornographer. Michelle Duggar finally admitted that there was no actual counseling involved.
Heaven only knows what kind of “counseling” his sisters and the other girl received.
Your point about some having it in for Christian families is well-taken, and all the more reason that we must follow the law - not to mention the Commandments - to the letter, and especially try not to give anti-Christians any fodder for their hateful agenda.
I agree with you, Kendra, and the point is, too, that it shouldn’t have even happened in the first place!Being unaware of a crime makes it ok? So, if someone were to come up behind someone, break their neck, killing them instantly, this person shouldn’t be in trouble? You know, because the victim didn’t know it was coming or even felt anything.
It is ludicrous that people don’t see molesting siblings, multiple times, as a major problem.
You should read the actual police report. One of felony forcible fondling consisted of Josh touching a hole in the seat of his sister’s jeans and telling her she had a hole there. The officer speculated that he might have touched the little girl’s skin. Another incident of forcible fondling consisted of Josh pulling the blanket off of his sister and touching her breast while he did it. His sister said that she thought he had just pulled the blanket off of her. She was awake. She did not realize he actually touched her breast when he did it.I agree with you, Kendra, and the point is, too, that it shouldn’t have even happened in the first place!
It’s like people are trying to justify that if his sisters weren’t aware of it, then it must not have been any big deal that he even did this in the first place, or his sisters must not have even been traumatized by it.
How does anyone even know that his sisters weren’t traumatized by this happening to them?! Sometimes people who were abused just don’t like talking about it! It doesn’t mean that they weren’t traumatized by it, because they aren’t talking about it!
Actually I think it’s the opposite. I think that often times the lynch mob is so overwhelming we have no choice but to try and interject a little sanity into the discussion. Even if we’d normally be in agreement with them. Sometimes it just goes too far.Two points:
Some posters have even essentially stated that protecting Josh from the bad conditions he would encounter in “juvie hall” or the secular justice system in general, was more important than protecting his victims from further assaults or preventing him from harming even more victims.
- I get the feeling much of Kendra’s passionate responses in support of the victims came about because so many other posters have minimized Josh’s actions, and essentially engaged in victim blaming; apparently, if someone is severely affected by being sexually abused, gets PTSD and has flashbacks and suffers from sexual dysfunction, it’s the victims fault for not being a good forgiving Christian.
.
Nope. I agree with ToeInTheWater. And Kendra. And others who aren’t minimizing what happened.Actually I think it’s the opposite. I think that often times the lynch mob is so overwhelming we have no choice but to try and interject a little sanity into the discussion. Even if we’d normally be in agreement with them. Sometimes it just goes too far.
I haven’t seen anyone minimize what happened. I’ve seen repeated posts discussing the actual facts in evidence based on the actual police report. And then I’ve seen a bunch of speculation based on assumptions.Nope. I agree with ToeInTheWater. And Kendra. And others who aren’t minimizing what happened.
Of course it shouldn’t have happened in the first place. No one is saying otherwise.I agree with you, Kendra, and the point is, too, that it shouldn’t have even happened in the first place!
It’s like people are trying to justify that if his sisters weren’t aware of it, then it must not have been any big deal that he even did this in the first place, or his sisters must not have even been traumatized by it.
!
This is what parents were told to tell their kids in the '80s and '90s, and maybe now by many therapists. I told clients, and my own children, if someone touches them anywhere on their bodies where they are uncomfortable, to tell them to stop and to yell/tell an adult.Indeed, even their instructions to their daughters that they not let anyone touch them between the neck and knees, to me suggests they made the VICTIMS the primary line of defense against further assaults. Which sickens me.