Josh Duggars father-in-law is rationalising his behaviour on their family blog.
“Many times it is simply lack of opportunity or fear of consequences that keep us from falling into grievous sin even though our fallen hearts would love to indulge the flesh. We should not be shocked that this occurred in the Duggar’s home, we should rather be thankful to God if we have been spared such, and pray that he would keep us and our children from falling.”
seewalds.com/grace-greater-than-our-sin/
Is he saying that all males would be child sex abusers if they knew they could get away with it?
Well, technically Michael Seewald ISN’T Josh’s father-in-law, he’s the father-in-law of his sister, Jessa (Duggar) Seewald. Not sure exactly what that makes him in relation to Josh.
I read his essay and while it DOES echo the “haters out to get them” and “don’t judge a repentant sinner” mantras of most of the Duggar defenders, it actually is a little more reasonable than the statements from the Duggars themselves.
The victims of Josh’s actions should not be lost in all of this. Sadly, this type of thing is all too common. Victims of sexual abuse of any kind often suffer greatly for many years as a result of these sins. We should not downplay the seriousness of these offenses particularly, nor gloss over the pain and confusion they often bring, sometimes for a lifetime.
At least he DOES acknowledge the pain and suffering of the victims. And I must admit that, although I’ve avoided speculating who the victims were, the Seewald’s actually commenting on this at all and mentioning the victims, really makes me wonder if their daughter-in-law Jessa was one of them.

If that IS the case, I do hope she had some (name removed by moderator)ut into this statement or at least knew it was going to be posted. Because otherwise…
considers purchasing tissues and barf bags
God have mercy on us…
And I actually do agree with this part:
"There are others that see this episode as a result of sheltering and repressing human desires. They think that had he access to sex education by Planned Parenthood, been allowed to watch edgy Hollywood films, been encouraged to experimentation with a girlfriend, or gotten free condoms from the local school nurse, then none of this would have happened…Josh didn’t sin because he was repressed, he sinned because like all of us he is a sinner.
And the responses to the essay do reveal that SOME of the critics are politically motivated, many of them run along the lines of “you guys are such hypocrites, you condemn gay people in loving relationships, and you defend a guy who might have molested your OWN daughter in law?”
However, I don’t see that as proof that “all of this is politically motivated”, more as proof that whatever credibility the Duggars and their allies had in being able to influence people’s views regarding conservative social causes, is shredded.
Also, I really put the Duggars themselves largely at fault for whatever additional pain and suffering the victims are going through right now. They’re the ones who chose to put their family in the spotlight as celebrities, KNOWING this history lurked in the background, knowing there was a risk it would become public.
ETA: Also, what I forgot to note last night when I posted all those quotes from the victims, is that Josh himself was never interviewed by the investigators who interviewed his sisters. His parents refused to let him be interviewed, even though they let their daughters go through the additional trauma of telling their stories to strangers.
All of this makes it pretty obvious to me that the Duggars put Josh’s welfare ABOVE that of his victims, which is pretty disgusting. Was it simply because he was a favorite child? Or does it reveal their general patriarchal mindset that men are more valuable than women?