7
7_Sorrows
Guest
On top of that, what a stupid name for a political book! I wonder who came up
with the title!!
with the title!!
Which is as ridiculous as saying āIf saving 2.1 million Americans doesnt convince youāā¦Which just proves my point that, if 120,000+ dead Americans donāt convince you, likely nothing will.
I know what you mean.Iām not sure what I was expecting when I joined, but I figured disagreements would typically result in people debating esoteric points about something, and not just outright attacking people while hiding behind the Church as an excuse.
This merits repeatingā¦Specifically, what merits of Trump?
His economic recovery?
His avoidance of new wars?
His appointment of good judges?
The best unemployment and employment numbers, particularly for people of color , ever.
His support for Israel?
His support for the soon to be born?
His trade policies
How about the demerits?
He says as us stupid stuff.
He is spending taxpayer Money like a drunken (or sober) Democrat.
He says stupid stuff.
His personal morality is not one to be emulated.
He says stupid stuff.
I watched CNN for a minute or so during Trumpās rally in Tulsa. They werenāt playing the audio, and the only commentary was about how few people were in attendance - nothing about the substance of what he was saying. And I donāt think itās a stretch to say that if there were more people in the arena they would be claiming that he was personally unleashing the second wave.But the constant āeverything he does is badā¦ā No, I donāt buy it.
That is your perception, perhaps?For starters it would take the MSM printing some of the good things President Trump has done and actually giving him credit. If they did fair reporting of some of the good stuff then some of the bad stuff would be easier to look in the eye. But the constant āeverything he does is badā¦ā No, I donāt buy it.
Wow ⦠I guess it wasnt the Democrats that taught Republicans that āsex between adultsā - consenting or not was not really a problem for politicians ⦠somehow it seemed to me that Democrats were very forgiving in this area ⦠many many times ⦠I get that in recent history there were a couple of casualties in the Democratic ranks ⦠but not at the top of the DNC - just a mere blip really ā¦ā¦generally I find Democrats to be more critical of Democratic leaders than Republicans are of Republican leaders