J
JoeyWarren
Guest
IMHO = In My Honest OpinionWhat does IMHO mean?
IMHO = In My Honest OpinionWhat does IMHO mean?
Not when i use it. - It means “In My Humble Opinion”.IMHO = In My Honest Opinion
Well the best way to handle this is to use your own line:The verification set forth by God that Christ was who He said He was is in the works that Christ performed; likewise with the apostles:Acts 2:22
“Men of Israel, listen to these words: Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst, just as you yourselves know—
Acts 2:43
**Everyone kept feeling a sense of awe; and many wonders and signs were taking place through the apostles. **
2 Corinthians 12:12
**The signs of a true apostle were performed among you with all perseverance, by signs and wonders and miracles.**True apostles perform signs, wonders, miracles.![]()
Amen, James!This thread is approaching 300 posts and certain things are clear.
Those who hold to OSAS have posted Bible verses supporting OSAS.
Those who oppose OSAS have posted Bible verses opposing OSAS.
Since the Bible cannot contradict itself, OSAS must be flawed.
Those who hold that Catholics believe in “works” salvation have ignored every effort by the Catholics here to make clear that the Church DOES NOT TEACH A WORKS BASED SALVATION.
So what is left? Semantics and rediculous details which are the arguments of people whose basic positions are weak. This is a sin of pride.
Ever siince the Protestant Revolution took hold, and tore the Bible away from Christ’s Church, ever new and disturbing “revelations”, and “understandings” have been put forth. Denominations have split and split again - thousands of them. ALL of this is SPIRIT INSPIRED?
Ever since the Bible has been seperated from the Church, ever increasing protestant denominations have been trying to “reinvent the wheel” to “get back to pure christianity”, but they can’t.
Why? because the early Church:
Those protestants who are wise, and really begin to look into this with intellectual honesty will find this to be true. many will become Catholic. As for the rest, many will succumb to the confusion and lies of the Evil one.
- Didn’t have “The Bible”, they were writing it - and
- The Early Church was Catholic.
But as for Me and My House, we will Serve the Lord.
We will reside in the Glory of His, One, True Holy and Apostolic Church, Tested by fire through the ages and built on the Rock.
Peace
James
I like this. I will think of it often.Amen, James!I am Catholic out of obedience. Many became and remain Protestant out of disobedience. Three things we must do to follow Christ:
What did Christ tell the rich young man who wanted eternal life?
- Deny yourself - your opinions, desires, wants, even needs.
- Take up your cross - that which afflicts you, burdens you, the
“thorn in the side” of which Paul spoke.- Follow Christ - Having done both of the above.
The spirit of antichrist has appealed to the ego. First to the ego of early heretics, then later to Luther and those who began with him, but then split off even from his movement. Now, the spirit of antichrist has exploited our American fascination with individualism and is leading so many of us to become our own church. Lord, have mercy!
- Sell your possessions (Deny yourself)
- Give the money to the poor (take up your cross - his love of possessions and money)
- Follow Christ.
The unity of Christ be with all of us.
Denial of self is obedience to Christ.
Have you “sold all your possessions and given all the money to the poor”?Amen, James!I am Catholic out of obedience. Many became and remain Protestant out of disobedience. Three things we must do to follow Christ:
What did Christ tell the rich young man who wanted eternal life?
- Deny yourself - your opinions, desires, wants, even needs.
- Take up your cross - that which afflicts you, burdens you, the
“thorn in the side” of which Paul spoke.- Follow Christ - Having done both of the above.
The spirit of antichrist has appealed to the ego. First to the ego of early heretics, then later to Luther and those who began with him, but then split off even from his movement. Now, the spirit of antichrist has exploited our American fascination with individualism and is leading so many of us to become our own church. Lord, have mercy!
- Sell your possessions (Deny yourself)
- Give the money to the poor (take up your cross - his love of possessions and money)
- Follow Christ.
The unity of Christ be with all of us.
Denial of self is obedience to Christ.
But, this opinion is held only by the Sanduskian church of the web!Belief is a prerequisite to baptism.
Baptism guarantees nothing (cf Mk 16:16).
Are you just trying to be argumentative?Have you “sold all your possessions and given all the money to the poor”?
You seem to claim that as the formula for salvation by your use of the example of what Jesus told the rich young man.
No! Christ said that it was what we need to do if we are to follow him. Breaking the attachment to worldly things, if you have such a cross, is one of the requisites. Possessions are indeed one of my crosses. Another cross was disobedience, but the gracious Lord helped me through that one. Now, the others…Have you “sold all your possessions and given all the money to the poor”?
You seem to claim that as the formula for salvation by your use of the example of what Jesus told the rich young man.
You’re avoiding the questions asked; why is that?But, this opinion is held only by the Sanduskian church of the web!
As baptism, in the New Covenant, replaced circumcision, so it is administered to infants. Jewish circumcision occurred on the eighth day. Did those eight day olds receiving circumcision profess a faith in the God of Israel? Some things a parent does in care of their child.
In biblical times, they baptized whole households, including children. The "Adult"erization of faith is a Protestant issue.
Christ’s peace be with all.
This is one of the things I have always noticed about our dear Lord. he never wanted anyone to rest on their laurals so to speak.Have you “sold all your possessions and given all the money to the poor”?
You seem to claim that as the formula for salvation by your use of the example of what Jesus told the rich young man.
I seperated this from the previous post because I didn’t want to mix the positive with the challenging, particularly since it applies to all of us:Have you “sold all your possessions and given all the money to the poor”?
You seem to claim that as the formula for salvation by your use of the example of what Jesus told the rich young man.
A very Catholic viewpoint.No one will truly know until the moment of their death.![]()
Huh?I seperated this from the previous post because I didn’t want to mix the positive with the challenging, particularly since it applies to all of us:
Since Jesus promised that His diciples would do what He did, if they had faith the size of a mustard seed,
How many lame have you cured, How many blind have you given sight to just by laying on of hands. How many trees have you withered with just a curse. How many mountains have you moved…
And Please, no analogies, or symbolic cures. Jesus’ cures were real and so were the Apostles. So only real miraculous cures please.
Anyone who hasn’t done any of these things, must question the strength of their faith. Especially if they are relying on “faith alone” to save them.
How did the question get around to me being the one worried about salvation?No! Christ said that it was what we need to do if we are to follow him. Breaking the attachment to worldly things, if you have such a cross, is one of the requisites. Possessions are indeed one of my crosses. Another cross was disobedience, but the gracious Lord helped me through that one. Now, the others…
Why are you worried about salvation? You have it guaranteed, right? Following Christ is the path to salvation, but not the entire mechanism. As you know, there is more to it. We can argue that, if we must, in other threads.
Christ’s peace be with you.
By that standard, you would not have a chance at salvation either, unless you also perform such miracles. It is faith alone that saves, according to the bible; but you seem to disqualify everyone but the apostles and a few early saints with your understanding of what Jesus was saying.I seperated this from the previous post because I didn’t want to mix the positive with the challenging, particularly since it applies to all of us:
Since Jesus promised that His diciples would do what He did, if they had faith the size of a mustard seed,
How many lame have you cured, How many blind have you given sight to just by laying on of hands. How many trees have you withered with just a curse. How many mountains have you moved…
And Please, no analogies, or symbolic cures. Jesus’ cures were real and so were the Apostles. So only real miraculous cures please.
Anyone who hasn’t done any of these things, must question the strength of their faith. Especially if they are relying on “faith alone” to save them.
Peace
James
I am trying to understand your concept of “eternal life” or “everlasting life,” what Scripture says is the free gift of God. You say you get it at baptism, but your actions thereafter determine if you have it when you die. If your possession of it is so tenuous and temporary, how can it possibly be called “eternal” or “everlasting”? If you ever HAVE everlasting life, how can it not last forever? And don’t tell me it can be in hell, because that is not the gift of God, it is the wages of sin. It is not just eternal existence. It is eternal LIFE, not DEATH. And it is ETERNAL and EVERLASTING.What I think you mean is you have to work hard not to sin, because in your thinking, if you sin (and especially if it’s mortal sin), you lose your “salvation” and are on your way to hell if you don’t get to the priest in time to confess and get absolution. Since you have no security, least of which “eternal security,” you are “in” a state of “grace” or “out” of it, depending on your sinning and confessing. In one minute, out the next. Back in, back out. So you can be “saved” and lost again and saved again, millions of times before you ever die and face the judgment. Then it is only your hope that the LAST state, at death, is IN and not OUT. And you think that is scriptural and the truth???
And to top it all off, you think your works will keep you IN or lessen your chances of being OUT at death.
There are six.Either that or the person is so committed to Protestantism he/she just can’t bring self to believe otherwise… either way, objectively speaking, it is not right and if one continues in error without concern for the truth, well, the truth has a way of biting you in … well, you know…
What do you mean by the third sin against the Holy spirit? What are the 1st & 2nd??
Why do you insist on harping on your unanswered questions, when you don’t answer other people’s questions? Are you here to “enlighten” us or to troll and knock some heads?Back on page 10, post no. 149, I replied to guanophore with the following, which I don’t think he/she ever responded to. I invite him/her to do so now, or anyone else who can:
I am trying to understand your concept of “eternal life” or “everlasting life,” what Scripture says is the free gift of God. You say you get it at baptism, but your actions thereafter determine if you have it when you die. If your possession of it is so tenuous and temporary, how can it possibly be called “eternal” or “everlasting”? If you ever HAVE everlasting life, how can it not last forever? And don’t tell me it can be in hell, because that is not the gift of God, it is the wages of sin. It is not just eternal existence. It is eternal LIFE, not DEATH. And it is ETERNAL and EVERLASTING.
I anticipated that response, and am still disheartened by it.A very Catholic viewpoint.
IMHO, your statement epitomizes the works/righteousness theological construct—it’s all about what you do.We may have complete trust and confidence in God’s promises, but we cannot presume to know if we will choose to remain in his light (though we are assured he will provide the graces to do so).