J
joshman1
Guest
They must be misinformed.
They must be misinformed.
So the Pope only supports refugees in an attempt to line his own pockets? Seriously, I didn’t think the defamation of the Pope could go any lower, and yet it does.
The sad thing is the only reason this all is in the spotlight is to bludgeon President Trump. This sort of thing has been going for a long time.Unfortunately, there is also money in refugee resettlement. I really didn’t understand that until I was told by a person with our diocesan charitable organization about it and how it’s often grossly abused. So there really is money, and a lot of it, behind importing refugees. I learned a little more from another poster on CAF as to how the agencies involved in refugee importation and “resettlement” work, and who they are. I encourage anybody who is interested in knowing about it to google “volag”, which is the acronym for those organizations. Look at the list carefully. Here it is. There are nine of them.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VOLAG
Completely false. It’s in the spotlight because it isn’t based in logic.The sad thing is the only reason this all is in the spotlight is to bludgeon President Trump. This sort of thing has been going for a long time.
God came not for the righteous but sinners. I don’t know - maybe that has something to do with it. They don’t pay Church taxes in Germany either as far as I know.I don’t see where the bishop’s or Pope commented on Trump’s decision to focus on the persecuted refugee Christians from the middle east, when President Obama allowed ninety nine percent of the refugee Muslims into the U.S, and only allowed one percent of refugee Christians into the U.S and kept the latter in holding facilities, but gave the green light for the Muslims?
Maybe you haven’t. But as I cited from the article earlier, Archbishop Chaput said the Church in the United States has reacted** “so strongly, so negatively - and so properly - to President Trump’s executive orders of January 28.”**Again, general concerns are one thing, and that’s fine for churchmen and perhaps appropriate to their role. Concrete actions are something entirely different, and so far I have seen none proffered by any churchmen. But state authorities have to face the more difficult task of actually formulating and implementing practical policies geared to protecting the citizenry.
So far, I have seen no direct Church condemnation of the concrete actions of this government in attempting to more closely scrutinize people coming from seven countries, all of which are terrorist havens.
The OP just quoted and linked it without commentary.
Sorry it doesn’t fit your political leanings.
If that’s true, where all of this criticism from the Vatican on down to the protesters in the last SIX years this was going down.Completely false. It’s in the spotlight because it isn’t based in logic.
He has also condemned the vicious attacks on Trump.Maybe you haven’t. But as I cited from the article earlier, Archbishop Chaput said the Church in the United States has reacted** “so strongly, so negatively - and so properly - to President Trump’s executive orders of January 28.”**
If Trump is merely repeating what Obama did, why are you okay with it?If that’s true, where all of this criticism from the Vatican on down to the protesters in the last SIX years this was going down.
You mean take into account practicality and fix something that’s leaky?He has also condemned the vicious attacks on Trump.
Now, which of the refugees actually qualify as refugees, and on what basis? I can understand admission of some refugees who are clearly fleeing deadly oppression, but when, as Germany discovered, about 1/3 have false identity papers, what is to be believed about them, and what is to be doubted?
rt.com/news/316570-eu-false-syrian-refugees/
General statements are one thing, but practical applications are another. If, indeed, Abp Chaput favors unquestioning admission of all who claim refugee status, then I cannot possibly agree with him on that.
But I doubt that’s his meaning.
Another Trumpolic.
More name calling?Another Trumpolic.
Let me make this clear, name calling is against forum rules!Let me make this clear to the teen-age Trumpsters, I will defend our Holy Pope and his Bishops. I will not put up with disrespect or outright attacks because they do not line up with current Glorious Leader in the White House.
Catholic or Trumpolic.
I’ll stand with the guy in the white robe.![]()