"
Podo2004]ok ok ok, let me take away all those rude, immature and insulting posts(let me start afresh). The latin mas is valid only if it is approved by a bishop, but should not be the norm because of the NO.Mass which is the standard mass today. We should attend the NO. Mass as often as possible and to quote myself(lol) we should follow what the 2nd vatican council said and attend the NO. Mass. Therefore i encourage you to go to the Novus Ordo Mass."
So far so good - however - as you probably figured out by now there were many folks who had a problem with this (just as you might if suddenly you were told - no more N.O. Mass - you must go to the Traditional Latin Mass from 40 years ago - you might obey but reluctantly, right?). Knowing this, John Paul II in his wisdom and with all the authority he has as the Pope decided that the Traditional Latin Mass could be celebrated
“licitly and validly” if the local Bishop gave his permission to do so. (that would be what is called by** Indult** and why some folks call it the Indult Mass).
This tread is entitled “Tradional Mass Not In Union with Diocese” Not approved eh? I have a question( implementing my newly aquired knowledge) that if the latin mass is not approved , it’s INVALID right?
So that mass would be invalid because the diocese didn’t approve it, right?
Oh that I could give you a yes or no simple answer but that’s close but no cigar
The particular Mass in question that started this thread, at the church mentioned definitely is “ilicit” (i.e. without permission of the Diocese). Research I did on this particular Mass opens question if it is even Valid because there is question of some actual valid ordination of its priests.
The Indult Mass (with permission celebrated by validly ordained priests) which I mentioned above is then both Valid and Licit.
There are some other Masses, for instance celebrated by a group called the SSPX - their priests and their Masses are Valid but they are not licit.
In otherwords their priests have the power succeeded from the seat of Peter (making them valid) but they do not have permission from the Bishop to celebrate these masses so that are ilicit and we should not attend them.
So can I summarize this for you - I’ll try.
1,
The normative Mass is what you call the N.O. Mass and it is
licit and valid and the norm. These normative Masses may also be celebrated in Latin or part Latin and part Vernacular. Most common in our country is that they are celebrated in the Vernacular (English, Spanish etc.)
- The Indult Traditional Latin Mass is both licit and valid because special persmission was granted to celebrate it and attend it. (An indult is special permission - for instance - if you receive communion in the hand - this is not really the norm for the whole Catholic Church in the world but it is allowed in some countries by Indult).
- Then there are Valid Traditional Latin Masses celebrated by priests who have the power to do so but not permission to do so - and so they are valid but ilicit.
- Then there are others whose priests have no power and no permission and these would be both Invalid and Ilicit
Just today I posted a thread titled Liturgical Buffet - it shows the Sunday Schedule for a Church in Chicago that offers all licit and valid Masses including High and Low Indult Traditional Latin Mass, the N.O. Mass in English and one in Latin. Four different Masses, all licit and all valid.
I hope this makes it a little clearer and thanks for being open to restarting this discussion
Another thing, don’t start biting my head off if you reply to this ok?
Podo The Hobbit