C
Catholic_Eagle
Guest
i 'm three of those options. WHat should I do ? Should I only post one of my opinions or can i post three? Someone please help me.:bigyikes:
I don’t believe that most Catholics are lazy or apathetic. I think they want to be *led. *Priests need to lead like the Apostles did, not just delegate everything to those that have the time to do it. All too often, these people who have things delegated to them are the liberals. The conservatives have a gaggle of children to raise and educate. They don’t have the kind of time necessary to be heavily involved. The liberals love the “Priest shortage” because it presents them with all kinds of opportunities.Mass, I enjoy both, SSPX is wrong, JP11 is THE POPE, read the Vatican 11 documents, what has happened in the church is not in them (in many ways) our church has been taken over by liberals, because they were/are active, most Catholics are apathetic, lazy, want to be fed, are ignorant of their faith and or are only “cultural” Catholics who if they go to church regularly only go out of habit. I am a convert.
Very True.The liberals love the “Priest shortage” because it presents them with all kinds of opportunities.
I think your statement may be a little misleading and would suggest you change the word “many” to “some”theodorro,
Since you know the problems in the USA then you can understand why many of us think the lack of attention the Pope has given to correct the situation is why we feel he is not a good Pope.
God Bless!
Let’s not refer to the 1970 Missal as an abomination. Even though it may be inferior to the Traditional Mass, it is a validly promulgated rite of the Catholic Church.I would love to see a return to the beatiful, reverent, but vernacular 1965 missal, instead of the terrible abomination that is the 1970 missal. The true fruit of Vatican II is visible in the 1965 missal - what we see today in the highly irreverent masses in American churches is a terrible thing, brought about by liberals running away with the church.
I did too, so I didn’t answer. Anyone want to try to answer for these people?I had a hard time answering the poll b/c “Traditionalism” doesn’t exactly have the same definition for everyone.
So I ended up putting, “No, but…” as my answer.
Amen! And the only thing the Pope ever said infallibly is that women can’t be Priests.Vatican II was a mistake and we are feeling the effects of it today.
The Novus Ordo is the biggest mistake of them all. As a result, most Catholics now do not believe in the real presence.
Pope John Paul II is the Pope and He can speak infalliably if He wants. However, I think He is one of the worst Pope’s the Church has every had.
My two cents…
You have to add to this, all the people he has canonisedAmen! And the only thing the Pope ever said infallibly is that women can’t be Priests.
If you went to Saudi Arabia for instance, and they gave you a jar of olives, the proper thing to do in acceptance of a gift is not to say “thank you” as we do here but to “kiss the gift” and that is what happened with the Koran.I don’t defend kissing the Qur’an
The english vernacular stinks, they did not even translated it correctly.I love the Holy Father and think we are indeed a privileged generation to be under his pontificate. I enjoy the current order of the Mass in the venacular, yet am pleased that the Church offers variety for those who do not. May God bless you for your faithfulness.
When, however, anyone states that the Holy Father is “the worst pope the church as ever had,” they show a lack of historical perspective and their “two cents” is over inflated.