Trump accuses Obama administration of wiretapping Trump Tower phones

[chero23]

Trump is covering something up.

If I may, I’m going to play devils advocate for 2 seconds.
I hope in no way you see me attacking you, just like I’m saying, I’m being a devils advocate for 2 seconds.

Sessions is the AG. Sessions was one of the few members from congress to support Trump.
Trump went and batted for him when he had some trouble during his senate hearings.
This is where I must ask.
Why would sessions now do something that can hurt Trump?

And if that’s the case, why doesn’t Trump fire him?

 

[Catholic_Unity]

If I may, I’m going to play devils advocate for 2 seconds.
I hope in no way you see me attacking you, just like I’m saying, I’m being a devils advocate for 2 seconds.

Sessions is the AG. Sessions was one of the few members from congress to support Trump.
Trump went and batted for him when he had some trouble during his senate hearings.
This is where I must ask.
Why would sessions now do something that can hurt Trump?

And if that’s the case, why doesn’t Trump fire him?

If Trump is withholding evidence that the wiretapping stories are fake, and he plans to release this evidence at just the right time, he might be able to save Jeff Sessions. Maybe Mike Flynn is still working for Trump behind the scenes.

 

[Jeanne_S]

youtube.com/watch?v=K6vvx2rHid0

I would recommend watching this, BBM. It is about an hour. If you do not want to, that is ok. But it is very irresponsible of you to deny possibilities of anything without first looking at the evidence available. THEN you make the conclusion you come to based on the evidence.

Actually, I would think that that hiding in plain sight, particularly since NOBODY would believe that John Podesta and Hillary and Bill Clinton, those angels sent here on earth(and who between them have been accused of murder, rape, drug-dealing, lying, obstruction of justice, and many other reprehensible offenses) to combat the scourge of conservatism, would run behind the scenes an EVIL and DEPRAVED, even SATANIC ring of pedophilic abuse, torture, and murder----would be the IDEAL cover. Particulalrly for people like the Clintons and Obamas, and the Bushes.

But like I said.

Your choice. Make up your own mind. Just do not arbitrarily dismiss this because it does not fit your narrow definition of “Logic.”

I just watched half of the video,it is very enlightening.Just sickening

 

[TMC]

CONFIRMED! JEFF SESSIONS TO AUTHORIZE ARRESTS IN WASHINGTON DC PEDO RING

Following the confirmation of Senator Jeff Sessions as the next attorney general, a series of mass arrests of politicians connected to a Washington D.C. pedophile ring is expected to begin in a matter of days.

theusa-info.com/confirmed-jef…n-dc-pedo-ring

Would you stop posting these ridiculous conspiracy theories? Its embarrassing to you and beneath this forum’s dignity.

 

[Reuben_J]

If I may, I’m going to play devils advocate for 2 seconds.
I hope in no way you see me attacking you, just like I’m saying, I’m being a devils advocate for 2 seconds.

Sessions is the AG. Sessions was one of the few members from congress to support Trump.
Trump went and batted for him when he had some trouble during his senate hearings.
This is where I must ask.
Why would sessions now do something that can hurt Trump?

And if that’s the case, why doesn’t Trump fire him?

Speculative questions. So you are up to no good.

Why would Trump fire his AG nominee?

 

[Catholic_Unity]

Would you stop posting these ridiculous conspiracy theories? Its embarrassing to you and beneath this forum’s dignity.

You should be happy that arrests of politicians connected to a Washington D.C. pedophile ring, will soon be happening. We need to protect the children.

100’s of CHILDREN MISSING IN VIRGINIA
youtube.com/watch?v=eaM3GIEX0yU&t=49s

 

[dvdjs]

I remember the whole Monica Lewinsky incident was pooh poohed as being a goofball conspiracy, if not for the infamous blue dress BC may very well have gotten away with that dirty little secret.(

How much better for us all that that dirty little secret was exposed and captivated the nation. Actually, how much better? Why did we do this and what was the benefit?

 

[BoomBoomMancini]

Things are getting real weird around these parts

 

[TMC]

You should be happy that arrests of politicians connected to a Washington D.C. pedophile ring, will soon be happening. We need to protect the children.

100’s of CHILDREN MISSING IN VIRGINIA
youtube.com/watch?v=eaM3GIEX0yU&t=49s

Repeating ridiculous lies does nothing to protect the children.

 

[TMC]

Things are getting real weird around these parts

I didn’t think this forum could devolve much further, but apparently it is now just another conspiracy forum.

 

[Catholic_Unity]

Repeating ridiculous lies does nothing to protect the children.

These are not lies. These children are still missing.

 

[OrdinaryMelkite]

I didn’t think this forum could devolve much further, but apparently it is now just another conspiracy forum.

Prove that what CU linked or even me is non-factual or wrong. Otherwise you are doing ad hominems typical of most dishonest debunkers--------can’t attack the evidence, so attack the source.

 

[Jeanne_S]

Prove that what CU linked or even me is non-factual or wrong. Otherwise you are doing ad hominems typical of most dishonest debunkers--------can’t attack the evidence, so attack the source.

Have to wonder how many here have even bothered to watch the video link you posted?

 

[BoomBoomMancini]

Prove that what CU linked or even me is non-factual or wrong. Otherwise you are doing ad hominems typical of most dishonest debunkers--------can’t attack the evidence, so attack the source.

I’m not going to turn myself into an investigative reporter and do a point-by-point refutation of a 60 minute Youtube video. On the one hand, you have some guy’s homemade Youtube documentary. On the other, you have multiple law enforcement agencies, respected journalists, and the simpleton who drove up from North Carolina with an AR-15 and admitted he didn’t find anything. You can say it’s all part of some grand conspiracy, and I can’t prove a negative. But “there is a conspiracy involving hundreds if not thousands of people raping kids at a pizzeria” is a REALLY extraordinary claim, and the vast majority of people who have looked into it have concluded it’s nonsense. Again, you can claim that they’re all part of the conspiracy, and I can’t talk you out of that, but the odds are very high that it really is tin foil hat insanity. It’s bumping up on the edge of mental illness. If you want to peddle in Alex Jones level fever dreams, be my guest.

 

[TMC]

Prove that what CU linked or even me is non-factual or wrong. Otherwise you are doing ad hominems typical of most dishonest debunkers--------can’t attack the evidence, so attack the source.

Complete garbage. What evidence is there that they are true? We have descended to allowing rank conspiracy nonsense, like Comet Pizza and Satanist pedophile rings. Extreme allegations require at least some support - there is no obligation to prove a negative.

 

[flowerz4rabbits]

I am confused by this thread.

Let’s assume there was indeed wiretapping.

If that’s so, a federal judge would have needed to sign off on the order. In order to sign off on such an order, there would need to be a great burden of proof that Trump had engaged in treasonous affairs. This is not the MSM. This is the law of our land.

What is the issue here that I am missing?

 

[Catholic_Unity]

Complete garbage. What evidence is there that they are true? We have descended to allowing rank conspiracy nonsense, like Comet Pizza and Satanist pedophile rings. Extreme allegations require at least some support - there is no obligation to prove a negative.

Do you want me to post some of the pictures?

 

[dvdjs]

Prove that what CU linked or even me is non-factual or wrong. Otherwise you are doing ad hominems typical of most dishonest debunkers--------can’t attack the evidence, so attack the source.

Just an aisde. An ad hominem argument is fallacious logically - it cannot, logically, prove a proposition. But tit is not without value. A reputation developed over time is a decent indicator of the reliability of a source, even if it not logically probative or utterly foolproof. And similarly for sources of ill-repute. Pointing out that an arguent is ad hominem is really ho-hum.

 

[BoomBoomMancini]

Do you want me to post some of the pictures?

Seek professional help. Seriously.

 

[OrdinaryMelkite]

Complete garbage. What evidence is there that they are true? We have descended to allowing rank conspiracy nonsense, like Comet Pizza and Satanist pedophile rings. Extreme allegations require at least some support - there is no obligation to prove a negative.

Have you seen the link and gone through other links on the internet related to that?

Also, you forget that it is highly unlikely that folks will just decide to come and expose something so evil. Their lives will be forfeit.

And just because the networks tell you there is no there there does not mean there is no there there.

What kind of proof do you need? Anderson Cooper telling you it’s the truth? Obama and the Clintons and even the Bushes doing mea culpas on Tv while on their way to jail?

The government telling you? NEVER trust ANYTHING the government tells you. Weigh what you know against what they tell and find the most reasonable truth THAT way. And depend on God and Christ alone to give you the ultimate truth.

Maybe that scream of the child in middle of the video----coming from that same pizza place----is not enough to raise an “hmmmmmph?”

Like I said, it’s your choice-----but do not be arbitrarily assuming that decide what is or what is not acceptable here.

Since we are getting off-track, “apparently,” let us go back to the Op topic----but it may be tangentially related to the other point at hand—who knows.