This is extremely uncharitable. Political discussion is nearly always fraught with discord, each side completely convinced they are in the right, telling others what they should believe, neither side willing to truly understand the other’s perspective.
In my opinion, Trump supporters are willing to overlook enormous character flaws, critical thinking deficits, criminal behaviour, and poor leadership just because they don’t like democrats and Trump says he’s prolife. As a psychologist, there are alarming patterns of behaviour to indicate serious personality disorders and pathology. BUT, I can see why many people support him when I listen to their reasons and I don’t just dismiss them outright.
Calling people who do not like your preferred politician ‘flies to garbage’ parallels Trump’s tendencies of name calling. When you write people off as ‘oh, they just hate Trump’ anytime concerns are brought to the fore, you actually make your perspective look weaker because you dismiss any dialogue and refuse to address valid concerns people have with Trump’s behaviour. It comes across as simplistic and lazy, and the result of this actually turns people away, reinforcing their opinions about Trump supporters and their inability or unwillingness to address very real problems with Trump, and the cycle continues. I would say the exact same about similar behaviour on the blue side of the aisle.
Whilst it is my opinion that Biden is the better presidential candidate I can certainly acknowledge his flaws and do not begrudge anyone who decides those flaws are too much to overcome. For me, Trump’s negatives are too much for me and I just cannot support him. To be frank, the last two presidential election cycles have produced weak and problematic candidates and many (most?) of us had to just hold our noses and vote for one.