Trump family’s elaborate lifestyle is a ‘logistical nightmare’ — at taxpayer expense

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sy_Noe
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, there’s the two pipelines that FINALLY got approval.

And some coal miners have gone back to work.
That covers Presidential Memoranda 5, 6, and 7 for the pipelines. Now which EO put coal miners back to work? (That still leaves 21 EOs or Memoranda that are not just undoing Obama’s, thus my conclusion that Trump seems to only know about governing by edict rather than by working with the Congress)
 
I voted for Trump. I won’t again. Not after what I’ve seen. Nor will I ever vote for any Republican that supports him.

I started believing he will be impeached after the inauguration. Not before.

That high crimes phrase you point out. How come you left out the misdemeanors part ?

I’ll review the electoral map while you review the Constitution of the United States.

Deal ?
It’s a little too early to say that you will not vote for Trump again nor any Republican that supports him.

Vote against him in a primary all you want… but we CANNOT allow the Democratic Party, which right now is EXTREMELY anti-Christian to win control.
 
For the 100th time:

Where was all this concern when Barack Obama and Joe Biden were in office and racked up 10 trillion dollars in new debt?
True… I’m originally from Delaware, and most of my family still lives in Delaware.

Biden would spend taxpayer dollars to travel up to Delaware to watch almost every sporting event his grandchildren had.

Biden did, as Vice President, everything he would have done as US Senator. But the problem was he now had Secret Service and was no longer taking Amtrak up from DC.

NOW - Personally, I do think that the President of the United States should be using the White House or Camp David for all weekend events.

But Trump is hardly the first US President to make use of his own vacation home for Presidential events. Obama & Clinton didn’t because they sold their homes when they moved into the White House. But George W. Bush kept his home in Crawford, Texas.

mansionglobal.com/articles/45778-presidents-weekend-homes-away-from-the-white-house

According to the above article, the following Presidents used their personally owned vacation homes in addition to Camp David

George W. Bush - Prairie Chapel Ranch in Crawford, TX
Ronald Reagan - Rancho del Cielo in Santa Barbara, CA
George H. W. Bush - Bush compound in Kennebunkport, ME
John F. Kennedy:
— Kennedy Compound in Hyannis Port, MA
— Hammersmith Farm in Newport, RI (childhood home of Jackie)
— Wexford Ranch in Middleburg, VA (was designed by Jackie while in the White House to be a weekend retreat away from the White House, but they only got to used it 3 times before JFK was shot).
FDR - “The Little White House” in Warm Springs, GA

But also, some Presidents, like Obama made use of Rentals, which I have to imagine in the long run cost the taxpayers even more money.

Here is a list of all Presidents who have used their Personal homes or rented ones has weekend or vacation White Houses

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_residences_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States#Summer_White_House
 
True… I’m originally from Delaware, and most of my family still lives in Delaware.

Biden would spend taxpayer dollars to travel up to Delaware to watch almost every sporting event his grandchildren had.

Biden did, as Vice President, everything he would have done as US Senator. But the problem was he now had Secret Service and was no longer taking Amtrak up from DC.

NOW - Personally, I do think that the President of the United States should be using the White House or Camp David for all weekend events.

But Trump is hardly the first US President to make use of his own vacation home for Presidential events. Obama & Clinton didn’t because they sold their homes when they moved into the White House. But George W. Bush kept his home in Crawford, Texas.

mansionglobal.com/articles/45778-presidents-weekend-homes-away-from-the-white-house

According to the above article, the following Presidents used their personally owned vacation homes in addition to Camp David

George W. Bush - Prairie Chapel Ranch in Crawford, TX
Ronald Reagan - Rancho del Cielo in Santa Barbara, CA
George H. W. Bush - Bush compound in Kennebunkport, ME
John F. Kennedy:
— Kennedy Compound in Hyannis Port, MA
— Hammersmith Farm in Newport, RI (childhood home of Jackie)
— Wexford Ranch in Middleburg, VA (was designed by Jackie while in the White House to be a weekend retreat away from the White House, but they only got to used it 3 times before JFK was shot).
FDR - “The Little White House” in Warm Springs, GA

But also, some Presidents, like Obama made use of Rentals, which I have to imagine in the long run cost the taxpayers even more money.

Here is a list of all Presidents who have used their Personal homes or rented ones has weekend or vacation White Houses

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_residences_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States#Summer_White_House
The difference is that Mar A Lago is a country club though, not a private residence like George Bush’s Ranch. I’m wondering how you tell people who paid 200,000 for membership that they and their guests will be extremly vetted. When he was there with the Japanese pm, there was a wedding going on. Everybody on the guest list was vetted?
 
It’s a little too early to say that you will not vote for Trump again nor any Republican that supports him.

Vote against him in a primary all you want… but we CANNOT allow the Democratic Party, which right now is EXTREMELY anti-Christian to win control.
Lots of Christians disagree.

Pluralities of Christians in the Episcopal Church, Presbyterian Church USA, Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, and others are Democrats or lean Democratic.

Majorities in the United Church of Christ, Church of God in Christ, National Baptist Convention and the African-Methodist Episcopal Church are Democrats.

pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/02/23/u-s-religious-groups-and-their-political-leanings/ft_16-02-22_religionpoliticalaffiliation_640px-2/
 
According to the Washington Post “In New York, the city is paying $500,000 a day to guard Trump Tower, according to police officials’ estimates, an amount that could reach $183 million a year.”

The only way these numbers work is if there are 400 cops working Trump Tower for security. I haven’t seen that on CBS or the NYT. I’m sure if it were true it would be shown every day. The math doesn’t work, and yet again more fake news. The Washington Post continues this at its own obliteration.
 
Lots of Christians disagree.

Pluralities of Christians in the Episcopal Church, Presbyterian Church USA, Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, and others are Democrats or lean Democratic.

Majorities in the United Church of Christ, Church of God in Christ, National Baptist Convention and the African-Methodist Episcopal Church are Democrats.

pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/02/23/u-s-religious-groups-and-their-political-leanings/ft_16-02-22_religionpoliticalaffiliation_640px-2/
Fine. Anti-Catholic and anti-evangelical.
 
Fine. Anti-Catholic and anti-evangelical.
I’m catholic and I’m a democrat. I would argue that anti-immigration, anti-universal healthcare, anti-reforms for the marginalized, anti-climate change are anti-Catholic as well.
 
I’m catholic and I’m a democrat. I would argue that anti-immigration, anti-universal healthcare, anti-reforms for the marginalized, anti-climate change are anti-Catholic as well.
Which of those issues - singly or in combination - results in the deaths of ~1 million children per year in the US alone?
 
The difference is that Mar A Lago is a country club though, not a private residence like George Bush’s Ranch. I’m wondering how you tell people who paid 200,000 for membership that they and their guests will be extremly vetted. When he was there with the Japanese pm, there was a wedding going on. Everybody on the guest list was vetted?
I don’t think it’s a problem for them.

Reason: When country clubs host major events, like the US Open, they often lose the ability to play the course, not just when the Open is in town, but could lose the ability to play for upwards of a year before hand so changes can be made to the course. Then, if they are not going to keep the changes, then it could be closed for another extended amount of time to restore the course to it’s former design.

Merion Country Club outside Philly, host of the 2013 US Open was a good example. They close a good part of the course for a long time to prep it for the Open and then to restore it.

Point is: a lot of Country Clubs see this kind of thing as a “status builder.” So they will not complain if it makes their membership more exclusive and valuable.

On the flip side, you have Pine Valley Country Club (outside Philly, in New Jersey) which is considered the best course in America (if not the world) that never hosts events because their way of creating exclusiveness and value is by having their country club be incorporated as a town (with a mayor and police department) and to never let people place the course except for very famous and powerful guests… who even then it takes a while before they can play.

Point is… I doubt the Country Club members will complain.
 
I’m catholic and I’m a democrat. I would argue that anti-immigration, anti-universal healthcare, anti-reforms for the marginalized, anti-climate change are anti-Catholic as well.
This argument is getting old. I don’t know any Republicans who are actually anti-immigration, anti-healthcare, anti-reforms for the marginalized. The difference is HOW to conduct those policies.
  1. Republicans want to see LEGAL immigration. I know many Republicans who want to make the immigration system faster and more fair for legal immigrants. I for one am one of them. I think anyone who wants to come to country to work and making a living for their family should be welcome with open arms. But people who want to come here to cause violence or milk the welfare system should not be welcome with open arms.
  2. anti-healthcare is the biggest misconception of them all. We are not anti-universal healthcare… But we are anti-Federal government health care. You see, Republicans believe in subsidiarity. We do not believe the Federal Government is the correct place for this kind of public policy. We believe that each State is different and that the will & needs of the people are best carried out by each state. If the people in CA for example want a single-payer system, then they can have have an election and create it for themselves. And if West Virginia wants the state government completely out of healthcare, then they can vote against universal health care in their state. Each state should be able to do what their people want. It’s not that we don’t want universal health care, it’s that we don’t believe the Federal Government can do a good job.
  3. and anti-reforms for the marginalized… This one is ridiculous. We are against SOCIALISM. Look at Hong Kong and Singapore. They both used to have very, very poor societies. But they removed all the unnecessary regulations and now they both have a booming economy and people are doing well there. Allowing free markets to flourish, with limited regulation (I’m not talking about criminal laws) gives people incentive to work hard and to take ownership in society. We believe in giving the poor the tools to fish, not continually fishing for them. The goal of Welfare should be to help people when they are down on their luck, not a place where they remain for their whole life. We need to help them get out of welfare. To do this, Republicans believe that religious organization, non-profits, cities, counties and states can all do this MUCH better than the Federal Government. What the federal government can do, is reduce religation so local organizations can do their jobs easier and get the “marginalized” on their feet and help them to contribute to society.
  4. In regards to climate change… yes, some people don’t believe it’s man made. Others, simply want to see the proof, and finally, there are others like me who believe that climate change is a COMBINATION of BOTH natural factors and man made factors. But science has NOT determined what % is man made vs natural. Right now, this issue is polarized, when it shouldn’t be. I’m willing to bet my salary that climate change is NOT 100% man made, and is NOT 100% natural. But due to the politicalization of this topic, many scientists are afraid to do the research or publish findings. Furthermore, the “radical environmentalists” and population control who all believe that we should be limiting the number of children born and who encourage & support abortion and euthanasia push conservatives away. The environment is very important, but we must not be supporting population control policies in the name of the environment. Finally, many conservatives want proof of man made impacts before initiating regulations & laws that hurt working families and make it hard for them to feed, clothe & house their families.
All of this comes down the point that Republicans are typically in favor of Federal Government focusing on what the Constitution directly says the Federal government’s responsibilities are, and leaving social policy to the states. We believe in subsidiarity, and the Catholic Social teaching of Subsidiarity is where most of these differences come from.

So to me, as a Catholic, I can accept the Republican Platform 100%. There is NOTHING in the written platform that directly goes against Catholic Social Teaching. There are some policies that I disagree with Republicans on, and the party is far from perfect. However, the Democratic Platform has plenty that is in DIRECT conflict with Catholic Social Teaching.

To me, it’s clear, compare the two platforms (not individual policies) but the platforms, which map out the parties goals and vision.

God Bless
 
Lots of Christians disagree.

Pluralities of Christians in the Episcopal Church, Presbyterian Church USA, Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, and others are Democrats or lean Democratic.

Majorities in the United Church of Christ, Church of God in Christ, National Baptist Convention and the African-Methodist Episcopal Church are Democrats.

pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/02/23/u-s-religious-groups-and-their-political-leanings/ft_16-02-22_religionpoliticalaffiliation_640px-2/
I would suspect many historically Black Protestant denominations have majorities supporting the Democrats because of the tone of the GOP. Otherwise, doctrinally many would be closer to Evangelicals and Catholics and wouldn’t be comfortable with the anti-Christian direction of the Democrats.
 
I’ve heard rumblings through the DC grapevine that some Republicans are tossing the idea around of impeaching both in 2018 so that Paul Ryan can then serve half of Trump’s term and then two full terms. Feel free to take that with a bucketful of salt because it seems a bit far-fetched even to me.
LOL - this is the most ridiculous thing I’ve read thus far. Mike Pence is highly respected among the GOP. Liberals hate him because he’s pro-life
 
I would suspect many historically Black Protestant denominations have majorities supporting the Democrats because of the tone of the GOP. Otherwise, doctrinally many would be closer to Evangelicals and Catholics and wouldn’t be comfortable with the anti-Christian direction of the Democrats.
Once again, Democrats aren’t anti-Christian.
 
Which of those issues - singly or in combination - results in the deaths of ~1 million children per year in the US alone?
Hopefully you can answer that when the climate and environment will no longer sustain life.
 
TRUMP PROGRESS REPORT AFTER THREE WEEKS ON THE JOB
  1. Trump erased all mentions on the White House website of “climate change.” He did that within ONE HOUR of taking the oath of office.
  2. Trump issued an Executive order to “ease the burden of Obamacare”.
  3. Trump returned the bust of Winston Churchill to the oval office.
  4. Trump withdrew America from the TPP treaty.
  5. Trump erased all Spanish language from the White House web site. It’s now “English Only[cdn-cf.aol.com/se/smi/0201d20638/02].”](http://cdn-cf.aol.com/se/smi/0201d20638/02].”)
  6. Trump issued an Executive order starting construction of “THE WALL.”
  7. Trump issued an Executive order banning funding to foreign pro-abortion groups.
  8. Trump’s new Secretary of Defense, James ‘Mad Dog’ Mattis (as the new Secretary of Defense), took the fight to ISIS by bombing them 31 times on his very first day[cdn-cf.aol.com/se/smi/0201d20638/02]](http://cdn-cf.aol.com/se/smi/0201d20638/02]).
  9. Trump announced temporary ban on refugees from Syria & Middle Eastern war zones.
  10. Trump imposed a media blackout at the Environmental Protection Agency & barred staff from awarding new contracts or grants.
  11. Trump announced a ban on visas from dangerous Muslim-majority countries with inadequate screening.
  12. Trump announced the end of “Sanctuary cities” & the defunding of federal funds for any city that chooses to continue breaking the law.
  13. Trump announced the hiring of 10,000 [cdn-cf.aol.com/se/smi/0201d20638/02]](http://cdn-cf.aol.com/se/smi/0201d20638/02]) new border agents.
  14. Trump signed an Executive order demanding the Secretary of Homeland Security publish a weekly list of violent crimes committed by illegal aliens.
  15. Trump signed an Executive order freezing the hiring of non-essential federal employees.
  16. Trump said out loud the words “radical Islamic terrorism.”
  17. Trump stopped [cdn-cf.aol.com/se/smi/0201d20638/02]](http://cdn-cf.aol.com/se/smi/0201d20638/02]) payment on Obama’s final hour giveaway of $220 million to the Palestinian Authority.
  18. Trump used Executive orders to give the go-ahead to the long-stalled Keystone & Dakota Access Pipelines.
  19. Trump got the State Department’s [cdn-cf.aol.com/se/smi/0201d20638/08]](http://cdn-cf.aol.com/se/smi/0201d20638/08]) entire senior management team to resign in frustration.
  20. Trump announced his intention to withdraw From Climate & Environmental Accords Along With UN Funding [cdn-cf.aol.com/se/smi/0201d20638/08]](http://cdn-cf.aol.com/se/smi/0201d20638/08]) Cuts of 40%.
  21. Trump tweeted “Ungrateful TRAITOR Chelsea Manning (who should never have been released from prison) is now calling President Obama a weak leader. Terrible![cdn-cf.aol.com/se/smi/0201d20638/08]”](http://cdn-cf.aol.com/se/smi/0201d20638/08]”)
  22. Trump announced he’ll begin a major investigation into voter fraud in the 2016 election.
  23. Trump got the chief of the Border Patrol to leave the agency in frustration at having to actually do his job!
  24. State Dept. Arms Control chief fired while on airplane; Trump told him to turn around & fly back[cdn-cf.aol.com/se/smi/0201d20638/08]](http://cdn-cf.aol.com/se/smi/0201d20638/08])!
  25. Miami-Dade mayor orders jails to comply with Trump crackdown on ‘sanctuary’ counties.
  26. Trump White House abruptly halts Obamacare ads.
  27. Trump appoints Neil Gorsuch to U.S. Supreme Court, as Justice in the mold of Antonin Scalia.
…and all this in less than two weeks in office. More to come!

He said we’d get tired of winning. I’m not there yet, but this is a pretty darn good start. You can tell he’s doing a great job— just look at the people he’s ticking off.

He has signed so many Executive Orders that the White House has run out of ceremonial signing pens.
In regards to #1 and #5 - the new WhiteHouse.gov website is pretty sparse right now. The Obama White House didn’t build a new website for Trump.
 
How many of Trump’s EO’s are simply undoing EO’s of Obama? I’m not aware of any. Obama’s EO’s were criticized, not just because some did not approve of their content, but because of the very principle of governing by EO instead of by working with the congress. And now we have a President who nominally has a majority in both houses of congress in his party, and still he chooses to govern by EO. I begin to wonder if Trump paid attention in civics class when the roles of the three branches of government were explained.
Yes, but if I’m not mistaken, Trump’s EO’s are ones that have been typical of Presidents for the last 40-50 years, which are EO’s which enforce laws that were set by Congress.

Obama had several that were outside what had been typical for a President, by going around the law or establishing new law by EO.

I’m not aware of a single EO by Trump that is not in line with laws passed by Congress (even if passed several years ago)
 
Yes, but if I’m not mistaken, Trump’s EO’s are ones that have been typical of Presidents for the last 40-50 years. Obama had several that were outside what had been typical for a President.
Typical, like the one that was just declared unconstitutional?
 
Except it may not be just the Democrats holed up.

Here’s one Republican senator calling for an exhaustive investigation. And the GOP Senate majority leader says investigation is likely. And another Republican said this mo that President Donald Trump’s possible conflicts of interest could be among the more than 40 items the House Oversight Committee investigates.

cnn.com/2017/02/14/politics/kfile-roy-blunt-flynn-investigation/

cnn.com/2017/02/14/politics/republicans-want-flynn-investigations/

cnn.com/2017/02/01/politics/jason-chaffetz-trump-administration-investigation/
If the Congress wants to do that on a bipartisan basis, then I’m fine with it. I do personally think it’s a witch hunt, but I would be fine with a bipartisan investigation.
 
Once again, Democrats aren’t anti-Christian.
No… they just declared war on the Little Sisters of the Poor. That’s all. Oh, wait… they also declared war on EWTN, Christendom College, Catholic hospitals across the nation, and other Catholic colleges and schools who follow the magisterium of the Church.

Plus, when did Hillary or Kane distance themselves from the anti-Catholic language in the Wikileaks? They didn’t, because Hillary believes that religions need to change.

They also support Abortion 100%, even though “Jane Roe” spoke out against the Roe v Wade ruling, and was even upset with it the day it happened (she later became 100% pro life, was baptized a Christian, started working with Priests for Life, and eventually become a Catholic).

And this is just a small example from the Catholics. They, also attacked Hobby Lobby and have looked to financially destroy any conscientious objectors to “same sex marriage.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top