Trump's Last Line of Defense

  • Thread starter Thread starter EasterJoy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
John McCain has brain cancer. He is acutely aware of how important it is to have affordable healthcare. In my humble opinion, Mr. McCain has been liberated from politics, and he is voting his conscience on behalf of the people of AZ. It is good to practice gratitude.
He’s also had a very full life. Why do you think I’m responsible to pay for everyone else’s treatment, procedures that are high risk for nominal life extension?

I think it’s great that they have insurance to cover these costs, but that’s not where I want the public dollar spent on healthcare. The public $ should go to help deliver basic healthcare to the needy. We can’t give everyone all the treatments they want.
 
John McCain has brain cancer. He is acutely aware of how important it is to have affordable healthcare. In my humble opinion, Mr. McCain has been liberated from politics, and he is voting his conscience on behalf of the people of AZ. It is good to practice gratitude./QUOTE

And in retrospect it would have been a bit strange to have been just diagnosed with a potentially deadly disease and fly across country to kick people of less means off fheir healthcare or to make it even less affordable. Regardless of what Donald Trump thinks about him, McCain was a war hero and a profile in courage this week. May God be with him.
 
John McCain has brain cancer. He is acutely aware of how important it is to have affordable healthcare. In my humble opinion, Mr. McCain has been liberated from politics, and he is voting his conscience on behalf of the people of AZ. It is good to practice gratitude.
And in retrospect it would have been a bit strange to have been just diagnosed with a potentially deadly disease and fly across country to kick people of less means off fheir healthcare or to make it even less affordable. Regardless of what Donald Trump thinks about him, McCain was a war hero and a profile in courage this week. May God be with him.
 
But it is currently not affordable. I thank John McCain for nothing! I look forward to the day he will not be on the republican ballot. He should have been running as a democrat anyway. Praying his retirement is in the near future.
Well considering that he will be 81 yrs old next month and has just been diagnosed with brain cancer, another battle to face in his life, and he was just reelected last year to another 6 yr term, you might get your wish. He will be 86 in 2022 when he would have to run again.
 
He’s also had a very full life. Why do you think I’m responsible to pay for everyone else’s treatment, procedures that are high risk for nominal life extension?

I think it’s great that they have insurance to cover these costs, but that’s not where I want the public dollar spent on healthcare. The public $ should go to help deliver basic healthcare to the needy. We can’t give everyone all the treatments they want.
“Had” a full life? *Had"? 😦

Senator McCain - a legit pro-life conservative - is a hero and a far worthier role model for our nation’s children than the potty-mouthed, multiple-divorced, multiple-bankrupt, #MakeRussiaGreatAgain Ugly American in the WH. Of that there’s no doubt whatsoever and our nation’s school’s textbooks will likely reflect that.
 
I think i’ve told you before, that he’s making good progress on what he promised,
with what he controls.

Illegal immigration is down 70% and they are adding more temp legal visas.
Whether or not we ever get a ‘wall’ he is delivering on his promise here.

Our NATO allies are now committed to honor their word and increase their defense spending. Given time this will take pressure off the US as the sole world policeman.

Healthcare and tax reform are still to be done, but I put more responsibility for that on Congress. If they don’t take action, there will be repercussions come reelection season.

He’s also still on the hook for tangible results in ‘cleaning out the swamp’.
Where did you read that our NATO allies have committed to increase defense spending? All I could find is that member-states promised they would begin submitting annual national plans, in the interests of transparency. I certainly couldn’t find any increases or promised increases that were a direct result of negotiations by Mr. Trump, so if you’d please find that, I’d appreciate it.

With regard to “the wall,” do remember that he promised Mexico would pay for it. He didn’t just promise a wall, then. He promised a big beautiful wall for free. If Mr. Trump’s opponent promised something for free, that person was elected and we got the promised item but wound up paying for it, tell me how Mr. Trump would rate that promise–kept or broken?

One more time: whose numbers say that illegal immigration is down 70%? How did they arrive at that number? This President has made a habit of throwing out numbers without saying where he got them, which is clear foul for someone who said that no one knows if we have 3 million or 30 million people in this country illegally. If you’re going to say some numbers are real and some are made up–and every number used in political decision-making should be evaluated for the how the measurements were done and what assumptions the number rests on–you’ve set the standard that all of your numbers can be demonstrated to be real…right?

Here are some Trump tweets about what is in the President’s control:
*Obama’s complaints about Republicans stopping his agenda are BS since he had full control for two years. He can never take responsibility.
8:11 AM - 26 Sep 2012

With proper thinking and leadership, we can have a much better plan than Obamacare - something that works for the people and costs much less
4:06 AM - Sep 29, 2013

Leadership: Whatever happens, you’re responsible. If it doesn’t happen, you’re responsible.
12:01 PM - Nov 8, 2013

“Leadership is perhaps the key to getting any job done.” – The Art of The Deal
12:59 PM - Aug 21, 2013*

That is the standard the President set for himself, not something I’m putting on him. If his party controls Congress and he doesn’t deliver an improvement in health care policy in the direction promised, that is on him. (I don’t hold him to delivering everything, even though I firmly believe he himself would, if the tables were turned.)

Health reform is still to be started, to be blunt. Tell me specifically: What is the President’s proposal? If he has no specific proposal and hasn’t made a disciplined effort to concentrate on this issue, in what sense has he done any work to achieve the results he promised? If anything, his public assessment that the House version was suffered from a “fundamental meanness”** after** they passed their first effort was counterproductive and politically harmful to his allies in Congress.

Mind you, there is nothing wrong whatsoever about wanting a bill with more heart!! That is a good thing!! The problem was not saying so BEFORE the House voted on the bill. He needed to be clear* ahead of time* about whether he had their backs if they passed it in the version they were considering. Otherwise, he’s really hanging needed allies out to dry and making it less likely that they’ll win re-election in 2018.

That can be excused as a rookie mistake, if he doesn’t do it again. Mr. Scaramucci’s choice to call up a reporter, fail to ask that the conversation be off the record, and treat this person who makes a living by reporting “colorful” news that no one else has heard to a barrage of “colorful” descriptions of the people Scaramucci worked with in the West Wing is likewise something he can put behind him if he is careful not to repeat his mistake.

The difference seems to me that Mr. Scaramucci has already proven he can admit a mistake, apologize, and amend his life. Mr. Trump is really weak in the area of admitting mistakes, apologizing, and changing his habits in order to improve his results. It seems as if he does things his way, period, no excuse, and if anything he attacks people who imply his conduct is in serious need of improvement. He also does things he attacked other people for doing with no apology at all. If you attacked former Presidents for things you are doing as President (such as, for instance, getting in a LOT of golf at considerable taxpayer expense in the Secret Service work, use of Air Force One, and so on), you really ought to answer questions about that with, “I was wrong. Now that I’m President, I can see why they did what they did. I’m sure it is not the first time I’ll learn the difference between theory and practice.”

If you cannot bring yourself to believe that a difficult job you have no experience at is really something that is not going to require a great deal of humility and diligence to learn, you are at an enormous disadvantage.

It is my belief that his core supporters are the only ones with the leverage to convince him to change his ways on that front. I don’t wish Hillary Clinton were in the White House. I wish the man who was actually elected would accept some correction and do his job a lot better than he has.
 
He’s also had a very full life. Why do you think I’m responsible to pay for everyone else’s treatment, procedures that are high risk for nominal life extension?

I think it’s great that they have insurance to cover these costs, but that’s not where I want the public dollar spent on healthcare. The public $ should go to help deliver basic healthcare to the needy. We can’t give everyone all the treatments they want.
I think at this point everyone - the general public as well as elected representatives- should be aware that healthcare is a complex issue. My father died from brain cancer so I have some actual experience with a disease of this sort. Specifically in regards to glioblastoma tumors, results of patient treatment become part of the research for a cure - sometimes as a general statistic and sometimes as a targeted research statistic. In other words funding care today also funds the cure of tomorrow.

I also believe that universal healthcare, primary medicine especially, is central to pubic health in ways that are rarely discussed anymore thanks to the success of vaccines. Take for example Ebola, and other potentially lethal, infectious diseases that result in widespread outbreaks, having a healthcare system in place where everyone has access to regular care from a primary doctor would be critical in preventing an epidemic.

I am concerned that not many people consider how inter-dependent health really is.
 
I think at this point everyone - the general public as well as elected representatives- should be aware that healthcare is a complex issue. My father died from brain cancer so I have some actual experience with a disease of this sort. Specifically in regards to glioblastoma tumors, results of patient treatment become part of the research for a cure - sometimes as a general statistic and sometimes as a targeted research statistic. In other words funding care today also funds the cure of tomorrow.

I also believe that universal healthcare, primary medicine especially, is central to pubic health in ways that are rarely discussed anymore thanks to the success of vaccines. Take for example Ebola, and other potentially lethal, infectious diseases that result in widespread outbreaks, having a healthcare system in place where everyone has access to regular care from a primary doctor would be critical in preventing an epidemic.

I am concerned that not many people consider how inter-dependent health really is.
I would agree that regular GP care should be broadly available. It should be affordable or provided for those who can’t afford it. A yearly check up and blood test is not expensive. I just disagree that the Govt owes paying for everyone’s expensive treatments.
 
The democrats gave us the mess of ACA, so they should want to fix it. So many Americans were
hoping to get rid of the mandate so they wouldn’t have to pay the fine because they
don’t want to be forced to buy Obama care, but the democrats have made sure they will pay one way or
another! You can’t have healthcare for everyone and not have healthcare costs go
up. After seeing what happened to Charlie Hard and his family, I don’t want the same
healthcare England has! The democrats made the mess, but now they don’t want to
take responsibility for the failure it is.
The Dems care more about preserving Obama’s legacy, such as it is, than help fix the mess they created.
 
John McCain has brain cancer. He is acutely aware of how important it is to have affordable healthcare. In my humble opinion, Mr. McCain has been liberated from politics, and he is voting his conscience on behalf of the people of AZ. It is good to practice gratitude.
Healthcare is not a worry or problem for anyone in Congress. They don’t have to
take part in Obama care.
 
Well considering that he will be 81 yrs old next month and has just been diagnosed with brain cancer, another battle to face in his life, and he was just reelected last year to another 6 yr term, you might get your wish. He will be 86 in 2022 when he would have to run again.
Believe me, I did not want to cast my vote for him, but I did. I might as well have voted for a democrat.
 
Nobody thinks congress has been doing their job, for a couple decades I’d say.

I have no qualms with Congress being insulted for their failure to act prudently. I don’t agree with everything Trump is pushing, but I don’t object to his alternative efforts to cajole congress into action. Being polite won’t overcome the power of lobbyists.
It’s okay to insult Congress. It is not okay to single them out and publicly humiliate them. Otherwise Newton’s Third Law of Motion takes effect.
 
Thanks, Mary, for this post. Not because we agree on something 🙂 but because it made so much sense. I agree about young people and that people pay the penalty because it is cheaper. I don’t pretend to have all the answers. But it indeed is going to be expensive to ensure everyone has affordable healthcare. ** The alternative seems unacceptable to me**. Now I admittedly can be a big sap IRL and I was actually sitting here with my eyes watering thinking about it after reading your post. So forgive me if I sometimes seem over passionate on the issue. But I’ve been voting my whole life with this issue in mind. And I will keep praying along with you that’s for sure. God bless.
God bless you as well. I completely agree the alternative is unacceptable. I hope we will see an available and affordable option for all very soon.

:tiphat:
 
The democrats gave us the mess of ACA, so they should want to fix it. So many Americans were
hoping to get rid of the mandate so they wouldn’t have to pay the fine because they
don’t want to be forced to buy Obama care, but the democrats have made sure they will pay one way or
another! You can’t have healthcare for everyone and not have healthcare costs go
up. After seeing what happened to Charlie Hard and his family, I don’t want the same
healthcare England has! The democrats made the mess, but now they don’t want to
take responsibility for the failure it is.
Didn’t you say you were on Medicare? What are you complaining about?
 
I just disagree that the Govt owes paying for everyone’s expensive treatments.
Only to the extent that you are interested in developing a cure might you personally be interested in participating through the government in funding care for brain cancer,

When my father had brain cancer in 2008, research in immunotherapy therapy research was just beginning to achieve some success. In August of 2015 former President Jimmy Carter announced “that he had melanoma that had spread to his liver and brain.” In May of 2016 Carter announced that doctors have said he “no longer needs cancer treatment thanks in part to a groundbreaking new kind of medication that trains the immune system to fight cancer tumors.”

abcnews.go.com/Health/remarkable-cancer-treatment-helped-jimmy-carter-combat-brain/story?id=37467459

Do you think that research would be taking place without the American people contributing to the cost of treating cancer? Make no mistake, the effort to find a cure for such diseases requires private contributions also, but we all stand to benefit from public/private partnership to find a cure - both in terms of better health and in terms of lower treatment costs ultimately.
 
The Dems care more about preserving Obama’s legacy, such as it is, than help fix the mess they created.
In my opinion, Mr. Obama built a house that he knew very well could not stand without a remodel. The thing is, once people are off the street and have a house, they won’t stand for being out on the street again. You can’t just condemn the building and say “sorry, that was a bad solution to your problem; you are better off homeless.”

This really was a push over onto the “slippery slope,” if you will, but I think he knew that the conundrum of people having to get health care they could not pay for only when it got to be on an emergency basis was also an untenable situation. Primary and preventive care is both cheaper and leads to a better quality of life for the patient than universal emergency care that health care providers are forced to give regardless of ability to pay only after the wheels are coming off on the health front.

Now that they have a start pushed through, working on getting it right really is not a choice. Maybe the Republicans will do something “their” way this time around, but in the end they don’t have much choice but to come up with a bipartisan solution to the problem. Americans actually are too big-hearted to let people rot on the street with treatable medical issues, but they are also far too responsibility-oriented to simply give away professional care that will predictably be abused if it costs nothing to get it. The problem is balancing those two realities in a more-or-less agreeable way.

That’s going to be the push and pull of coming to a set of health care solutions, a set that is actually financially, socially and epidemiologically tenable in the long term.

As for the President, there is an art to being President. It is an art that can never be perfected and an art that–yes, he is right!–has to change with the times. It does require social and emotional intelligence when it comes to dealing with the human beings in the Legislative branch, though. and human beings haven’t changed all that much. The art requires an ability to delegate, which means the necessity of trusting others with decisions because the whole enterprise is far too vast for one person to oversee personally.

The legacy of the President always rests in the hands of others and therefore depends greatly on how the President handles his relationships with all those other people he cannot do without. It is very different than a business, and nothing can change that, either, even though governments can learn a great deal from business and are better off leaving some of the necessary work of civilization to private hands.

Government is not and never will be a one man show. I think the President can realize much better results if he can be convinced to make some fundamental changes in his behavior. I think he can do that. I think it will require pressure from his base to make that happen. I hope they’ll do that.

If someone doesn’t push him to change, however, I think there is very little chance that he will. If he doesn’t, it is hardly possible that he won’t continue to get in his own way and in the way of those he must have to help him succeed far too much of the time.
 
In my opinion, Mr. Obama built a house that he knew very well could not stand without a remodel. The thing is, once people are off the street and have a house, they won’t stand for being out on the street again. You can’t just condemn the building and say “sorry, that was a bad solution to your problem; you are better off homeless.”
Good analogy.
 
It’s okay to insult Congress. It is not okay to single them out and publicly humiliate them. Otherwise Newton’s Third Law of Motion takes effect.
To me, you have a bizzare definition of “insult” if it excludes singling someone out in a public manor. And someone can’t be publicly humiliated unless they’ve done something humiliating.

Since Trump is trying to fire up the voter base to apply pressure, it needs to be public. And we are dealing with Newton’s Second Law in this scenario.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top