S
Seamus_L
Guest
One dead in violent clashes in Donetsk euronews.com/2014/03/13/ukrainian-demonstrators-clash-in-eastern-city-one-dead/
Unfortunately, it may be the first of many, as the different regions of Ukraine rebel against the non-democratic elected government, chosen by Kiev.One dead in violent clashes in Donetsk euronews.com/2014/03/13/ukrainian-demonstrators-clash-in-eastern-city-one-dead/
So you brought up the Spanish civil war in which Russia was also heavily involved, in fact, who do you think the Republicans were mimicking when they killed so many Catholic religious?In hopes it will help my argument I’m saying now that there was an attempt on my part to speak a little cynically because although I’ve revealed hypocrisy all over the western world concerning the Spanish Civil War, yes I’m certainly happy that the RCC in Spain was saved and Franco remained in power even though his saviors have been condemned for all eternity by the western world due to their later atrocities in WWII.
The Republicans didn’t make a mistake when they murdered thousands of religious, it was a deliberate attempt to exterminate and/or suppress the Church in Spain, i.e., they knew the Church would not tolerate an atheistic ideology, i.e., communism. And I’m not twisting anyone’s words I’m simply taking umbrage with the way you express yourself.As far as my meaning that the “red terror made the mistake of murdering 6000 Catholic clergy” I’ll say here that I suspected your “being a girl” for several posts because of the way you can twist words (not even sure of your meaning of “who knew??”), but I’ll go at it again for clarification on my part.
**Yes the Republican side of the Spanish Civil War was represented by I guess many atheists including the red terror which as far as I understand couldn’t restrain themselves from murdering over 6000 Catholic priests and nuns .
So the Spanish population fearing that an atheistic ideology was going to be imposed upon them by very violent Republicans made a mistake?The mistake was that the basic Spanish population rose up against the Republicans to side with the Nationalists because of that atrocity against the RCC not to mention it also caused Mussolini and Hitler to go to Franco’s aid.
The Conversos were already Christian, yet the purpose of the Spanish Inquisition was to question whether or not their Christianity was authentic, i.e., no Jew or Muslim was being converted during these trials. And the Spanish monarchy was in charge of directing the Spanish Inquisition, i.e., King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella, although there were priests who inquired into the faith of the conversos or those accused of heresy, it was not always a priest, one had to be however a lawyer. The pope was only initially involved in the Spanish inquisition, however, he retracted his support of it once he heard news of the torture, there is I believe a bull which he wrote. Moreover, the Holy Roman Empire was created for the purpose of defending Christendom in the West and as such the Church, the emperor was a secular monarch not a pope, thus I believe you are confusing it with the Holy Roman Inquisition, which is now referred to as the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.On the matter of my being right or wrong about the conversions, I think you’re getting petty there because they were being converted to Roman Catholicism and as a matter of fact I think I could find proof that the Holy Roman Empire was called that because law and justice was administered by the Roman Catholic Church in those days
Yet the U.S. is supporting the present Ukrainian government, which has the support of both the UGCC (Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church) and UOC (Ukrainian Orthodox Church).I’m saying that an element of Americans got into the history books as supporting the Republican side in the Spanish Civil War and for one reason or another they cared less if the Roman Catholic Church were torn asunder in Spain at the time.
There you go again but instead of using the word “twisting” I’ll substituteAnd who says they “couldn’t restrain themselves”? They deliberately killed 6000 religious because they wanted to impose an atheistic ideology on ALL Spaniards.
So the Spanish population fearing that an atheistic ideology was going to be imposed upon them by very violent Republicans made a mistake?
Yet the U.S. is supporting the present Ukrainian government, which has the support of both the UGCC (Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church) and UOC (Ukrainian Orthodox Church).
You are absolutely right!!I just cannot believe how hypocritical America is being with all this. Not only do they invade countries for differing reasons but America even has laws that state it won’t help leaders that have taken over a democratic country via a coup.
Obama knows America couldn’t win a war with Russia which is why they keep talking of freezing peoples assets.
For those interested in what is really going on, it would be helpful to read insights of Jesuit Superior in Ukraine:
thinkingfaith.org/articles/20140313_1.htm
I doubt that Putin would invade Ukraine proper. My reasoning is:Russia Is Preparing to Invade East Ukraine, Estonia Says
Russian President Vladimir Putin is preparing to “invade eastern Ukraine” after occupying the country’s Black Sea peninsula of Crimea, Estonia said.
Russia warned that Ukraine’s government has lost control of the country today, fueling concern the Kremlin may extend a military intervention as U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry called for it to halt a takeover of the disputed province.
Events in Ukraine “clearly show that the Russian Federation only accepts force,” Estonian Defense Minister Urmas Reinsalu said in an e-mailed statement today. To deter Putin, “a clear message needs to be sent that an attack will cost the aggressor dearly.”
In the biggest dispute between Russia and the West since the fall of the Iron Curtain, the standoff is shaking markets and threatening to upset more than two decades of economic and diplomatic integration between former Cold War enemies. It’s also raising the risk that a lasting geographical conflict zone may emerge between Russia and the European Union.
bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-14/russia-is-preparing-to-invade-east-ukraine-estonia-says.html
I doubt that Putin would invade Ukraine proper. My reasoning is:
Putin isn’t Hitler or Stalin. However much we might not agree with them, he has what he believes to be solid, rational reasons for his actions, backed by what he sees to be best for Russia.
- The KGB didn’t raise idiots, party sycophants, or megalomaniacs to the rank of lieutenant colonel and put them in the field - even in friendly countries - under the First Directorate. The Soviet Union had already had one Stalin, and they did NOT want another. They also needed their foreign service officers to be loyal, intelligent, and objective - not propogandizing parrots of the Party.
- If Ukraine itself was the goal, he would have invaded at the same time he sent troops into the Crimea. At this point, there is exactly zero element of surprise. An invasion of Ukraine would invite direct conflict with NATO.
- If he were to invade, there is no doubt that Russia would quickly overcome the Ukranian military. However, victory in that scenario puts several NATO countries directly on his border, which is the last thing he wants for Russia.
- Taking over Ukraine makes the Chernobyl cleanup Russia’s problem again.
Why does that site say:For those interested in what is really going on, it would be helpful to read insights of Jesuit Superior in Ukraine:
thinkingfaith.org/articles/20140313_1.htm
?The online journal of British Jesuits
Invading another country because you are “afraid” some other country might do something doesn’t justify the invasion under international law (or moral law for that matter)According to Wikileaks, this could well be Russia’s response to fears of NATO moving into Ukraine in the near future original.antiwar.com/hallinan/2014/03/13/wikileaks-ukraine-and-nato/.
I am not twisting or warping anything, it is your inability to properly express yourself that is causing you problems, for example, who uses “Mother Russia” if they themselves are not from Russia, and then when I tell you that “Russia is not my mother”, you act offended, and attempt to reprimand me. Then you claim that the Republicans “made the mistake of killing 6000 religious” or that they “couldn’t restrain themselves” . . . . . reread your posts and see why someone like myself might get offended by the words you’ve used.There you go again but instead of using the word “twisting” I’ll substitute
“warping” my words.
No the Catholic Spanish populace didn’t make a mistake by supporting Franco and the Catholic Church, the mistake was made by the Republicans, not that they didn’t want to destroy the Catholic Church. but that they used poor strategy in performing their evil deed before they had control of Spain and its people.
Nobody implied that Russia today is the same as what it was under Communism, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t have elements of the totalitarian while it’s been under the leadership of Putin.The Republicans with their Bolsheviks may have been mimicking the Soviet red terror, but I repeat that today’s Russia is back to Eastern Christian Orthodoxy (also victims of the Soviet red terror)
I thought they were neo-Nazis, that is, Russia’s leadership/media is projecting the present Ukrainian government as neo-Nazis.And I also repeat that the Ukrainian rebels have an element of the communist red terrorists among their ranks.