Unamerican Secret Trial presided by Democrat Adam Schiff

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You will declare you are investigating my personal election issues or I will withhold the money you need and the nation you defend will be subsumed back into the new Soviet Union.
Tough to find biblical evil to compare to that
 
Yes. His exact words were investigate my personal election issues. You have no problem hold people to written word when defending their position but reading into whatever you want defending yours.

Talk about Soviet style propaganda. Go ahead, explain educate us all how this makes sense and we can’t see the obviousness if your conclusions. Should be interesting. Does it involved Russians this time or maybe his tax returns…
 
Last edited:
Exact words? Lol. It I clear and convincing evidence, not " exact words or nothing."
 
Russia is only the invading force. Lol. And he was OK handing over his tax returns likr every other candidate. What happened?
 
You are not getting it is no kind of standard. I know you people still vote for him if he shoots someone. I surmise, even if he shoots a fetus.
Bribery is a high crime.
 
Last edited:
Maximus1 said:
You are not getting it is no kind of standard. I know you people still vote for him if he shoots someone. I surmise, even if he shoots a fetus.
Click to expand...
I will say this. I was flagged yesterday for using Ol shifty to describe Adam Schiff. Ok, I get it, no name calling so I am sorry.

However, when I see Moscow Mitch used (for example) the same flaggers don’t flag (as far as I know) and I won’t flag because I am not shutting someone down over something stupid.

This post is offensive and disturbing. It speaks a level of genuine disrespect you have for others. I doubt your like minded buddies on here will call it out, maybe because they agree.

I still refuse to flag it. It speaks more for people to see the ignorance than to take it down and censor it.

You keep yelling your stuff.
 
I am sorry you are offended. I have heard that Trump voters somehow think Trump was joking when he said that. He was gloating perhaps, amazed perhaps, delighted perhaps, but not joking, as if not meritorious. ( At least in sincerity saying it.) Do you take offense at Trump for saying it?
The fetus statement was offensive perhaps and if I offended sorry. I tried to describe something potentially worse than shooting just a person. In truth people could think it worse or not as bad or the same.
 
Last edited:
I don’t care if Trump meant it or not. But ‘we people’ would hardly support that and the charge that ‘you people’ would is ridiculous. The fetus part was just incredible but whatever.

How you can make comments like that but I get flagged for ‘ol shifty’ is pretty telling in my opinion.
 
I have been flagged.
Again sorry if you are offended. This of course assumes you were offended at Trump forsaying it about you in the first place, since I am repeating( something you say you are offended by)
 
Be sure I did not flag you. I did not hear Trump say it, he is wrong if he did.
 
thefederalist.com

Yovanovitch Emailed With Dem Staffer After Whistleblower Complaint

What makes the email particularly unsettling is that it indicates former Ukraine ambassador Marie Yovanovitch possibly committed perjury.
thefederalist.com thefederalist.com
The latest revelations further buttress accusations that the House’s “impeachment inquiry” has been a dishonest endeavor, “cooked up” by Democrats through possibly months of backdoor dealings.
Click to expand...
In other words, if dishonest episodes continue to wreak havoc on this inquiry, any impeachment (and possible removal) that results from it likely will be seen as tainted and illegitimate. Democrats should take heed.
Click to expand...
Absolutely!
 
I didn’t doubt he said it but thanks for making sure I knew he said it and I needed to be fairly offended all around.
 
Last edited:
dvdjs said:
If your can’t argue the facts of the charges, or the legal standards, pound the table.
Click to expand...
Facts of the charges are the transcript is released with no clear issues in it. The witnesses present intuition, opinion, and personal interpretations, often without even first hand knowledge. Now we find out some of their testimony is likely false.

Still very likely the House will cook up a partisan impeachment as they have been telling us they wanted since Jan 2017. The Senate will very likely not remove based on non evidence evidence.
 
Don’t you know the other witnesses on the phone call who said there was no quid pro quo and nothing concerning to them don’t matter to the Democrats, they pick and chose and cherry pick their witnesses. Everyone knows too if this was a criminal case in a court of law and if the #1 witness refused to testify the case would be automatically dismissed. Let them continue on with their hopeless “coup”. The crooked Democrats are infamous for accusing others of their own unlawful behavior, it’s a clinical sign of what sociopath narcissist do.
 
Last edited:
As it typical with some people here, they assume that which I am not. I am not a Democrat, nor am I Pro-Choice, nor am I a single-issue voter. I wish these people would get off of stereotyping people without having the common decency of maybe asking them and I what we believe in.

However, truth be told, I very often do not respond to posts directed at me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top