M
Maximus1
Guest
You have to be arrogant to do what Trump did after surviving Russia
I’ve been posting the actual transcripts of the accusers, not “versions of events.”That so many here still buy in to the media/ Dems version of events is really stunning.Sadly I think this is reflective of the lock step De m supporters’ overall![]()
For some reason people here aren’t that interested in reading them, likely because the reality is pretty clear, and there is no easy defense of the administration. All the people here can do is shout loudly about the Bidens and hope people stop talking directly about Trump.Although this was the first time I had seen the details of President Trump’s July 25th call with President Zelenskyin which he mentioned Vice President Biden, I had come to understand well before then that “investigations” was a term Ambassadors Volker and Sondland used to mean matters related to the 2016 elections and to investigations of Burisma and the Bidens.
The interesting thing is the inclusion of the 2016 server conspiracy theory in his Ukraine demands. The biggest beneficiary of such a pronouncement would be Russia, insofar as the Muller investigation conclusively found that the interference was a Russian operation. Endorsing a fake Ukrainian conspiracy would take attention away from the real Russian interference.One crime we do know Trump committed, though, and this one is horrendous. He actually thought, as POTUS, he was the one that set US foreign policy! Terrible.
I never considered that.So if indeed Trump was indeed “setting US foreign policy” by attempting to implicate Ukraine in the 2016 election interference, why was he placing Russia’s interests ahead of the United States?
Bold mine.I’ve been posting the actual transcripts of the accusers . . .
You mean like just random people off the street?Were there no “transcripts” from non-accusers?
Wasn’t Mr Schiff clear he didn’t allow for a defense? Still holds the veto over any “inconvenient” witnesses.You mean like just random people off the street?
They did the right thing.They haven’t show up.
And the section he did more than presume based on presumptions of others since he admitted he didn’t actually talk to DT?Can you quote me the section in the transcript where he said there was no quid pro quo?
Mr Schiff’s power trip is the real election interference.I wouldn’t “show up” for a kangaroo court either.
By mid-July it was becoming clear to me that the meeting President Zelensky wanted was conditioned on the investigations of Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U. S. elections. It was also clear that this condition was driven by the irregular policy channel
Your complete lack of interest in fixing corruption is astonishing. There are, by the way, documents connecting the money to Burisma via a Ukrainian bank owned by the same oligarch that founded Burisma (the company Biden was connected with.) Part of that $7B was the $1B that Biden used to bargain the dismissal of the Ukrainian Prosecutor Shokin.I am aware it is a country invaded and dominated by a cleptocrats. Manafort represented a Putin puppet who fled to Putin’s Assylum and was convicted of TREASON.
Stolen money is their reality. That said, there is no link to the Biden’s according to them. It is their issue to Perdue until Trump made it a campaign investigation.
Actually JapaneseKappa, the fallacious reasoning here is from you.Ah yes, the circular “Its a kangaroo court because there is no defense and there is no defense because it is a kangaroo court” reasoning.