F
fhansen
Guest
Did God cease loving mankind after the Fall? God will allow us to choose for Him, with all that implies in terms of our obedience, or *against Him, with all that implies in terms of lack *of obedience, in spite of His profound love for us. It is the love of God that saves us in the end, BTW, and our response to it.Hello again Clem.
One of the things that jumps out to me in Granny’s bringing to mind the two thieves at the Crucifixion is this: The one thief, the unrepentant one, wanted God to save himself and the other thief from death. He said “Are you not the Messiah? Save yourself and us.” From what did the thief wish to be saved? DEATH. The biggest condition of all. And this “proof” of Jesus’ Messiahship wasn’t just desired by the unrepentant thief, it was called for by the people standing by watching, the rulers, and even the soldiers. They all wanted life without death. That’s why it is called “the final test.” We all face it. God didn’t stop it. He submitted to death. One of the most perplexing dilemmas of the ages - God DIED! But to my eyes, this only proves my point. I thank Granny for bringing it up.
To me that speaks volumes about the CONDITIONS God accepted to be one of us. He accepted death on a Cross. He became obedient even unto death. It was man’s fall in Eden that brought sin and death into the world. It changed everything. All Adam and Eve had to do was to live by one condition: don’t eat the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
Clem, you state among other things this: "Without God’s gratuitous love, experienced through prayer, through the Sacraments, through the commandments, through a relationship with him… I am nothing. Faith itself is a gift of his love, because of my own I don’t have much of it.
Because he loves me, he will provide the grace I need to desire him alone. (Hopefully sooner rather than later, but in his time) If I place my trust in satisfying conditions to merit his love, I am in trouble, cause that means his death on the cross isn’t proof enough of his love. "
The most troublesome part of your statement is the expectation that because God loves you He will deliver you the grace you need. That is exactly the kind of thinking that comes from allowing the “unconditional” stuff to go to your head. The word “unconditional” is at its best a sentiment. At its worst it is part of the OSAS doctrine of the Protestants. THEY AGREE WITH THAT. Because that is exactly what they mean - the love of God is what saves them. Jesus died for them,etc
Add to this the fact that you think satisfying conditions places you in trouble. How can I show you the value of those who take vows, those who submit to conditions beyond the regular requirements of life as a Christian if you don’t even understand what it means to submit to conditions at all? You think conditions are bad for you. So, what about religious vows? Are they meaningless? Certainly NOT! But they ARE extra conditions voluntarily entered into. And what about matrimonial vows? Aren’t these also an acceptance of CONDITIONs voluntarily entered into? Why should God lead the way by His acceptance of conditions in this life? So others would see the value in them and follow Him by accepting conditions above and beyond those placed upon us by life.
Perhaps understanding things this way is why I personally cringe whenever I hear the phrase “unconditional love of God” tossed into conversations like water on roses. It is tainted water and would eventually kill the roses.
Glenda