US Catholic bishops applaud judge’s immigration decision

[kimmielittle]

Thank you kimmielittle. I couldn’t remember the USCCB ever going so far as to outright call for amnesty.

You are very welcome.Just call me kimmie,if you want

It is also important to keep in mind that what the USCCB supports, or more specifically what the subcommittee on migration supports is not the same as “the Church teaches”. USCCB statements are not magesterial pronouncements.

ABSOLUTELY

BUT it USCCB ] can’t teach against the fundamentals of Church Teachings. Not that I believe they have. It is why I focused on the Fundamentals of TRUTH and Individual Responsibility .

 

[dogwoodkeys]

If they are illegal immgrants then they are criminals b/c they have broken the law.

Your right, I meant …not all are dangers criminals and drug dealers. But yes, they are criminals b/c they are here illegally and sucking up all of our resources that should be used to help our own people and then in turn help others. I have herd that some people are worried about how AZ will be able to support this law financially but…in the long run it should balance out if you think about the fact that we will not have to pay their hospital bills when they hurt themselves coming over, we wont have to pay to hold as many of them in our jails and provide them with an attorney b/c fewer will risk coming over to AZ. And the less money will will hopfully not have to pay to clean up after them when they trash our desert. Its funny how all these states that dont have a fraction of the problem with illegals that AZ does are snubbing us for protecting ourselves. Americans are dying b/c of this problem but i guess that is a minimal problem.

 

[dogwoodkeys]

If they are illegal immgrants then they are criminals b/c they have broken the law.

I was merely quoting what the law actually states; it would behoove anyone who rants about illegal immigration to at least uphold the law and not read into it what isn’t there.

Supposedly, there are 20 million jaywalkers each hour in the U.S. Does that give drivers the “right” to run them down?

no one is being run down…they are being sent home. and actually there are a good number of them that are armed and have forced us out of parts of southern AZ b/c it is to dangers to visit. we treat them with more respect they they treat immigrants from south of their boarders. Do you know what the Mexican gov. does to them?
The Mexican Gov. support illegal immigration to the US because of the US money that is sent back to Mexico. The pressure needs to be put on their gov. to take care of their people. Mexico has tones of natural resources that could create jobs.

 

[Tigg]

"Does anyone read the U.S. Constitution these days? American lawyers don’t read it. Federal Judge Susan R. Bolton apparently has never read it. Same goes for our illustrious Attorney General Eric Holder. But this lawyer has read it and she is going to show you something in Our Constitution which is as plain as the nose on your face.

"Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 says:

“In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction.”

In other words, the Judge in the Arizona case has absolutely no Constitutional jurisdiction over the matter upon which she ruled. As the Constitution makes abundantly clear, only the U.S. Supreme Court can issue rulings that involve a state.

This means that neither Judge Bolton nor the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, to which the case is being appealed, have any legal standing whatsoever to rule on the issue.

Thus, U.S. Attorney-General Eric Holder filed the federal government’s lawsuit against the state of Arizona in a court that has no authority to hear the case.

canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/25983

The judiciary is so compromised now, I wonder if this will go anywhere. Perhaps our bishops, since they are so much into backing the political wind of the day, should re-read our Constitution. Would it make a difference? Probably, not, I fear!

 

[dogwoodkeys]

right behind you kimmielittle.