I believe one thing we are missing here that if there are those who analyze Obama’s speech as talking about long-time divisions between Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland.
Then we should remember Obama has seemed to stand against what was British colonialism in places such as Kenya.
But come Northern Ireland we are speaking about a religious division, does Obama miss out that the British likewise can be seen as colonial occupiers and still occupiers of Northern Ireland??
So, it’s not clear to me but it could be when the discussion is Kenya or other exotic locales, the talk is about colonialism.
But if one wants to go the radical route, if it is talk on Northern Ireland, no mention of Colonialism, the division is assigned to religion. I think there is something wrong with this picture and at worse, it would be ignoring a similar background of colonialism that pertains say to India or Kenya and blaming divisions of the Christian faith.
A bit of an odd-view and something to watch as he makes a trip to Africa, to see if now again, colonialism might be mentioned but not in NI.