L
Lea101
Guest
? I don’t think anyone on CAF denies why families are breaking apart. We just don’t accept your hypothesis that feminism was all bad, or the secular’s hypothesis that it was all good.
Woah. There are many kinds of parishes around the world, but, there is not a Catholic parish that encourages people to break their marital vows. To suggest that there is, frankly it is a level of scandal that needs to be called out.But society and culture are not supportive of her keeping her vows. In many cases, not even the local parish or congregation
Those are excellent points.But rather, the mgtow philosophy for Catholic men is pretty silly given that women who stick to Catholic teaching are still going to be rare and will still be rare even if they change all the divorce laws tomorrow.
Ie your problem isn’t divorce laws, but the culture conflicting with our faith (which mgtow supports, given its support for pornography and pre marital sex, objectifying language etc obviously)
It’s even more dangerous for a man to have a long term relationship and children with a woman than it is to marry her, but that’s not the question here. We are assuming that we are all Catholics and the first is not even an option.Question: If US law is supposedly so favorable to divorcing wives, why are so many babies born outside wedlock today? (We have something like 40% of US babies born outside of marriage.)
Surely, if women are eager to get the most out of men and divorce is super lucrative, surely those women would be trying harder to have children in wedlock and then and only then divorcing?
I thought we were discussing the general social situation?It’s even more dangerous for a man to have a long term relationship and children with a woman than it is to marry her, but that’s not the question here. We are assuming that we are all Catholics and the first is not even an option.
Marriage is a life-and-death issue, even setting aside divorce. Pregnancy and childbirth are still dangerous, babies are frequently lost to miscarriage and stillbirth, lots of babies are born with special needs, including disabilities that will impose life-long obligations on the parents, or disabilities are acquired later in life by children. Furthermore, serious illness and disability can happen to either spouse and are eventually a near certainty.you can’t expect men to not think that any marriage comes with life-and-death risk.
Only if they are improving in some respect.that time is on their side.
How is it more dangerous for a man?It’s even more dangerous for a man to have a long term relationship and children with a woman than it is to marry her, but that’s not the question here. We are assuming that we are all Catholics and the first is not even an option.
There are more factors than “how much money a wife would get”.Related: divorce rates are a lot lower for high-income households. So, paradoxically, the more money a wife would get from divorcing a guy, the less likely she is to divorce him.
That’s what they call it.manosphere? Seriously?
Red pill saved my life. Literally. I found out through the grapevine last year that the woman with whom I broke off a possible engagement years ago recently divorce raped the man she married after we broke up. No further details, but it’s as bad as they come. Bullet dodged. My Catholic upbringing never prepared me to properly vet a woman like her. Neither did my parents. Only the red pill helped me suss out the red flags. I was even criticized by some for letting her go. … smh … There but for the grace of God go I. I can never go back to the old blue pill mentality yet I still like women in general and still want to be married.ZR, I have to say, you’ve been doing the Red Pill thing for a long time now. How is it working for you? On the one hand, you haven’t made a bad marriage, but you also don’t seem to be making any progress. At some point, it may be time to consider a different approach. Some of your Red Pill stuff is probably a positive (fitness, good clothes, dancing, etc.) but I wonder if your Red Pill stuff doesn’t make you negative and suspicious and closed-off in a way that makes it hard for you to bond with a good woman. None of us wants to be treated like police suspects by somebody we barely know.
They are not a turnoff in my experience. Women want their (name removed by moderator)ut, to be sure, and I have no issue with that, but they usually like men to take the lead.I think your views on women are very one dimensional. Probably a massive turn off for many potential women.
This occurs much more often in Protestant and Evangelical churches that are more accepting of divorce in the first place. However I do know of one instance many years ago where an adulterous and abusive wife gaslit the parish priest into believing her husband was the evil one and the priest not only took her side in the counseling, he supported her kicking her husband out and supported the subsequent divorce. When the guy found out about much later how the parish priest had aided and abetted his ex-wife beyond the counseling sessions, he confronted the priest and filed a complaint with the diocese. But crickets … this was back when they were still mostly protecting the sexual abusers in the priesthood. Maybe now it would be different, I don’t know.Woah. There are many kinds of parishes around the world, but, there is not a Catholic parish that encourages people to break their marital vows. To suggest that there is, frankly it is a level of scandal that needs to be called out.
Would you believe…from a woman…that is nonsense?They are not a turnoff in my experience. Women want their (name removed by moderator)ut, to be sure, and I have no issue with that, but they usually like men to take the lead.
cont.
Then you don’t like men to be leaders?Would you believe…from a woman…that is nonsense?
Trust me. It is a turnoff.