D
dvdjs
Guest
I have presented the summary of over a dozen acts of collusion. That is the record.
Thanks for the link. It does show that fusion GPS had other clients and should not identified with the DNC or Clinton.
- Status
You’ve presented a misrepresentation of them.
. Clinton and the DNC hires them. That lawyer met with Simpson before and after the a Trump Tower meeting. It was a set up from the start.
D
dvdjs
Guest
The Mueller report does not show collusion.
Nobody else used them to collude with Russia, using Russians with close ties to the a Kremlin.
D
dvdjs
Guest
Of course it does. The summary of the collusion events have been posted on threads that you participated in.
How do you know this?
Sorry. The report found there was no collusion.
Do you have evidence that Republicans did us them in collusion with Kremlin contacts like Clinton did?
D
dvdjs
Guest
That is simply untrue. And given the lengths that Mueller went to point out that he was not talking about collusion, it is surprising that anyone could be in the dark about that.
The accounts of direct contacts between Trump campaign and Russian operatives are in the Mueller report. these contacts were, of course, not like Clinton: neither she nor her campaign had these direct contact.
What charges of conspiracy collusion were offered, brought of suggested?
In the only sense that has meaning, the legal sense, the was no collusion. Any other conclusion is political rhetoric.
Contact is not collusion. Contact is contact. If we spent millions of dollars to find out if the Trump campaign had contact with Russians, it is a bigger waste of money than anyone thought.
Last edited:
D
dvdjs
Guest
Ahh, so you’ve flipped from “no collusion” to no “Charges of conspiracy collusion”? 'nuff said.
Are you off to equivocate on this as well. These contacts involved discussion of ways to interfere in the US election and help the Trump campaign.
There’s no flip. There’s no collusion. There was no collusion. I’ve been firm all along. We are talking legality. There was no collusion. You flipped, by Changing to the word “contact”.
You didn’t answer the question.
No. There were no such conversations. Even in the tower, no such conversation took place.
There was contact, but no collusion.
D
dvdjs
Guest
Collusion vs., charges of conspiracy collusion. That is a 5.o degree of difficulty flip.
That idea is inconsistent with evidence reported by Mueller.
No one has ever been talking about casual contact. The entire event is about conspiracy collusion. Why would here be a multimillion dollar investigation into whether Trump Jr. had coffee with a random Russian, and happened to talk about the election.
Then where are the charges? Where is the recommendation for indictment?
Arguing? Naw. Expressing differing points of view.
D
dvdjs
Guest
The matter of collusion is 2019.
But the matter of truth is eternal.
U
undead_rat
Guest
I think that you all are missing something in the “what is next” discussion. The cards are still in the Iran’s hand. Its so-called missile strike was just a pin-prick and was actually forewarned to Iraq by Iran. It is just a smoke screen for the purpose of drawing away attention from its future actions. Iran remains outraged by the murder of its top General who was in Baghdad at Iraq’s invitation on a diplomatic mission.
I would refer all to the terrible visions attributed to Pope St. Pius X which describe a disaster at Vatican City that causes the death of both Francis and Benedict. In my opinion this disaster will be caused by a combination poison gas and dirty bomb attack which only Iran has the capacity and motivation to carry out.
I would refer all to the terrible visions attributed to Pope St. Pius X which describe a disaster at Vatican City that causes the death of both Francis and Benedict. In my opinion this disaster will be caused by a combination poison gas and dirty bomb attack which only Iran has the capacity and motivation to carry out.
T
Theo520
Guest
If they had anything AT ALL,
Nancy would have put in in her impeachment articles.
And regarding Mueller, I’ve been speaking the truth.
He was in Iraq to orchestrate continued attacks on the US embassy. He was in charge of the proxy terrorist groups.
They can be outraged all they want about the death of their lead terrorist.
U
undead_rat
Guest
In recent years he and his para-military groups had been working with the USA to defeat ISIS. If he was, indeed, a criminal, where was the arrest warrant?
“They can be outraged all they want about the death of their lead terrorist.”
I wouldn’t dismiss Iran’s ability to retaliate quite so easily. Consider the visions attributed to Pope St. Pius X about a disaster at Vatican City which appears (at least to me) to be a combination poison gas and dirty bomb attack. Iran has the ability and now the motivation to carry out such an attack.
“They can be outraged all they want about the death of their lead terrorist.”
I wouldn’t dismiss Iran’s ability to retaliate quite so easily. Consider the visions attributed to Pope St. Pius X about a disaster at Vatican City which appears (at least to me) to be a combination poison gas and dirty bomb attack. Iran has the ability and now the motivation to carry out such an attack.
Last edited:
- Status