What did Jesus bring to the world that was not already brought by Moses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Servant19
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
However, it makes 100% sense only to some Catholics (including also Catholic converts), but not to all Catholics. And to most non-Catholics, that percentage is considerably less.
Well, that’s what further study and refinement of what you know is for. Knowledge and learning is like exercising any other muscle or skill; have to practice at it to keep it in shape. I would be willing to bet lots of money that the Catholics who don’t fully understand the teachings of the Church have either not yet dedicated an adequate portion of their time to understanding WHY they believe what they believe, or choose not to.

I can speak even less of non-Catholics, but I will say that there reaches a point for many in which they could learn more, but choose not to for various reasons. God knows their hearts, not I, and many factors are at play.
 
Well, that’s what further study and refinement of what you know is for. Knowledge and learning is like exercising any other muscle or skill; have to practice at it to keep it in shape. I would be willing to bet lots of money that the Catholics who don’t fully understand the teachings of the Church have either not yet dedicated an adequate portion of their time to understanding WHY they believe what they believe, or choose not to.

I can speak even less of non-Catholics, but I will say that there reaches a point for many in which they could learn more, but choose not to for various reasons. God knows their hearts, not I, and many factors are at play.
I will agree with you that we can all learn more.
 
I will agree with you that we can all learn more.
Very much agreed. We have to be able to relate to others to get anywhere in anything, religious dialogue or otherwise. I appreciate your patience. I am doing my best currently to learn tactful dialogue and how to respect others better, and your patient example helps me greatly, and shames me a bit. Thank you.
 
The idea of ‘learning more’ tends to be a little to amorphous to survive for long in the world of polemics.
 
The fact is that in the small span of 160 years Bahá’í Faith has seen more divisions than any other religion."
Interesting, this. :hmmm:

At least, with Catholicism it took 1500 years for any real splintering to occur.
 
Very much agreed. We have to be able to relate to others to get anywhere in anything, religious dialogue or otherwise. I appreciate your patience. I am doing my best currently to learn tactful dialogue and how to respect others better, and your patient example helps me greatly, and shames me a bit. Thank you.
While tactful dialogue is essential, I don’t think it comes so easily to anyone, including myself. In my profession as a teacher, patience is definitely required! Thank you for the compliment.
 
Because we have the assurance of Christ Himself.

He left us a Church, His Body, to speak for Him.
How do you know that the assurance that Christ said really was said by Christ?

As an objective observer, that’s where the doubt might come in…
 
That is not at all what she said, and you know that very well. Stop playing games, please.
…in which case I misunderstand when she said “Sin will not win in you”?

My apologies therefore, I do not understand what PR meant by that phrase 🙂
 
How do you know that the assurance that Christ said really was said by Christ?
Again:
Fides quarens intellectum.

Faith and reason.
As an objective observer, that’s where the doubt might come in…
Doubt is fine, Servant. We as rational beings are always called on to doubt.

It is willful doubt which will kill you.
 
Very much agreed. We have to be able to relate to others to get anywhere in anything, religious dialogue or otherwise. I appreciate your patience. I am doing my best currently to learn tactful dialogue and how to respect others better, and your patient example helps me greatly, and shames me a bit. Thank you.
I must also voice my commendation and praise upon your efforts to dialogue with more courtesy Lochias. Your efforts and courage inspire me to try harder always.

God bless you 🙂
 
Roman Catholics mean specific concepts when they use the words, among many, salvation, sin, grace, atonement, redemption, divinity, Triune God, revelation, inspired writing, Church, original sin, paradise (Garden of Eden), resurrection, ascension, Holy Spirit, Incarnate Word, baptism, heaven, hell, etc., etc., etc.

it is not possible to carry on a fruitful discussion unless those discussing agree on the meannings of the words they are using.

it could be that a fruitful discussion might ensue if it were limited to a definition of terms, remaining in discussion until a term is agreed upon. then going to the next term upon which there is disagreement and discuss that term until agreement is reached.

i would note that the RC definition of these words, terms, concepts have developed and been refined over the last two millenium through writing, discussion and practice among tens of thousands of RCs.

my suggestion, pick a term used by both parties to the discussion and discuss that single word (concept) until both parties agree on its meaning for the purposes of using in future discussions.

i realize of course that thousands of sincere, holy and knowledgeable people have been doing this for generations. in the case of the RCC, for nearly 50 generations (if we define a generation to be 40 years in length. if agreeing upon a definition of terms were easy, the hundreds of thousands of pages written by tens of thousands of RC intellectuals and saints would not have been written. and, these hundreds of thousands of pages, are, essentially, discussions of terms.

the most obvious example of how far apart in meaning bahai and RCs are when using the same simple words would be in the respective definition of the word Father in its relationship to divinity.

for example, to the bahai, the word father, when applied to a discussion of divinity, seems to be defined as one of the, if not the greatest, manifestations of the Creator of all things. to the mormons, the word means a physical human being who achieved godhood. to the catholics, the word father, in the context of divinity, means the First Person of the Most Holy Trinity of which there is nothing greater.

now we can all agree to disagree on the correct meaning of the word Father, but if we disagree, using that word to discuss spiritual reality serves little to no purpose.

so, can we start by identifying the words that hold the same meaning to all of us.

i hope that does not come down to the words the, and, and a.🙂
Well said Eddie.

Let’s start with “sin” and “original sin”

What is the Catholic, Jewish, Islamic and Bahai understanding of these concepts?

(An official link will suffice)
 
…in which case I misunderstand when she said “Sin will not win in you”?

My apologies therefore, I do not understand what PR meant by that phrase 🙂
I am certain that you knew that I was not stating that I never sin.

Of course you knew that.

That my sins are forgiven through Christ and His Sacraments…you know that, too.
 
Interesting, this. :hmmm:

At least, with Catholicism it took 1500 years for any real splintering to occur.
You can choose to believe what you wish PR, but it’s not necessarily Truth.
As I say if any can tell me how many people are adherents of the so called “sects” of the Bahai Faith, I will personally give them free dental treatment for life (I’m a dentist and I’m happy to travel :). )
 
You can choose to believe what you wish PR, but it’s not necessarily Truth.
As I say if any can tell me how many people are adherents of the so called “sects” of the Bahai Faith, I will personally give them free dental treatment for life (I’m a dentist and I’m happy to travel :). )
Why would you want to know “how many people are adherents” of Bahai sects?

Why does that matter? :confused:
 
Why would you want to know “how many people are adherents” of Bahai sects?

Why does that matter? :confused:
Because 6 people in the planet who want to start an anti-Bahai group are not really considered a sect…
 
Because 6 people in the planet who want to start an anti-Bahai group are not really considered a sect…
What number, then, consists of a sect, and could you please cite your reference?

Then I will be able to determine what groups meet your criterion.
 
What number, then, consists of a sect, and could you please cite your reference?

Then I will be able to determine what groups meet your criterion.
Any number will do PR…

I really think this is totally irrelevant to the thread PR, you may start another thread if you wish or alternatively PM me and we can discuss

(Martins watching ;). )
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top