D
DavidChrist
Guest
To abide in Christ is to live in the abode of the Spirit that is within us.
Jesus was the man.
Christ is the Spirit.
Jesus was the man.
Christ is the Spirit.
I am more partial to the “single-two sided-response view” about the Temple." In Mat 24:4-35, Jesus gives signs that will precede the Temple’s destruction and In 24:36-25:46 he conceals the precise day and hour of God’s judgment. During the close of the age, the Old Covenant age will terminate with Jerusalem’s destruction. This “closing” is linked with God’s rescue of the righteous and his judgment of the wicked (13:39-43, 48-50). And like I said from the begining, this prefigures Christ’s second coming at the end of time. This view squares with Jesus prediction that all these things would take place within one generation.Jesus answers all three of their questions but He does not distinguish between them by saying, “Here is the answer to your first, second, and third question.”
You are correct about the CCEL link. I goofed.The link you provided doesn’t cover 70 A.D. Only up to the time of Herod the Great. You’re confused with Antiochus Epiphanes.It won’t be “another one.” But what Paul says in 2 Thess. 2:4 is what Jesus was referring to in Matt. 24:15.
Matthew says, they will see this “abomination of desolation” “Standing in the holy place” - this does not need to be understood as the temple only, but Jerusalem also, and any part of the land of Israel. to the Jews, all Jerusalem was considered holy.
Matthew 4:5 (NKJV) Then the devil took Him up into the holy city, set Him on the pinnacle of the temple,
Daniel 9:24 (NKJV) "Seventy weeks are determined For your people and for your holy city…
Revelation 11:2 (NKJV) "But leave out the court which is outside the temple, and do not measure it, for it has been given to the Gentiles. And they will tread the holy city underfoot for forty-two months.
Mark says, “standing where it ought not,” meaning the same thing. But Luke really clears it up for us.
Luke 21:20 (NKJV) "But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then know that its desolation is near.
By reading the surrounding verses, you cannot deny that this is a parallel account to Matthew’s Olivet Discourse. Parallel accounts cannot have a different meaning. By combining Luke’s statement with secular history, it is clear that Cestius Gallus and his Roman army were the abomination of desolation. It was fulfilled in A.D.66 when the Romans surrounded the city of Jerusalem.
Chrysostom wrote: “For this it seems to me that the abomination of desolation means the army by which the holy city of Jerusalem was made desolate.” (The Ante-Nicene Fathers)
Augustine wrote: (379) “Luke to show that the abomination spoken of by Daniel will take place when Jerusalem is captured, recalls these words of the Lord in the same context: When you shall see Jerusalem compassed about with an army, then know that the desolation thereof is at hand (xxi. 20). For Luke very clearly bears witness that the prophecy of Daniel was fulfilled when Jerusalem was overthrown.” (vol. 6, p. 170)
C.H. Spurgeon wrote: (1888) “This portion of our Saviour’s words appears to relate solely to the destruction of Jerusalem. As soon as Christ’s disciples saw “the abomination of desolation,” that is, the Roman ensigns, with their idolatries, “stand in the holy place,” they knew that the time for their escape had arrived; and they did flee to the mountains.” (Matthew: The Gospel of the Kingdom. . p. 215).
Albert Barnes wrote: (1949) “The abomination of desolation means the Roman army, and is so explained by Lu, xxi. 20. The Roman army is further called the abomination on account of the images of the emperor, and the eagles, carried in front of the legions, and regarded by the Romans with divine honours” (Matthew p. 254)
The Roman armies were an abomination and desolating ones to the Jews; not only because they consisted of Heathen men, and uncircumcised, but also because of the images of their gods, which were upon their ensigns: for images and idols were always an abomination to the Jews. Now our Lord observes, that when they should see the Roman armies encompassing Jerusalem, with their ensigns flying, and these abominations on them, they should conclude its desolation was at hand.
to be continued…This was, therefore, Christ’s explanation of the abomination of desolation. The Roman army, heathen, with heathen images and standards, ready to sacrifice to idols on the temple altar, working the desolation of Jerusalem and the temple.
After many predictions about the kingdom of God being taken from Jews and about Jerusalem’s destruction the Lord told his disciples that not one stone would be left upon another of the temple, it would all be destroyed. The disciples responded with the questions; “When, and what will be the sign of your presence and the end of the Jewish age?” In answer to their question, Jesus tells them that first the gospel must be preached to all nations and then the end would come. Then he tells them that THEY (not some far distant generation) would see the “abomination of desolation” spoken of by Daniel the prophet. He told them it would be a sign to THEM of his presence and the end of the Jewish age. He said it would all happen in THEIR generation. It did! They saw the “abomination of desolation” and when they did they fled to the mountains. Jesus can be trusted, his Word is true.
We need to begin to take the words of Scripture seriously, Jesus said he would return to that generation and he did. It’s time we believed his words :
John 18:36 (NKJV) Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so that I should not be delivered to the Jews; but now My kingdom is not from here.”
Luke 17:20-21 (NKJV) Now when He was asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, He answered them and said, "The kingdom of God does not come with observation; 21 “nor will they say, ‘See here!’ or ‘See there!’ For indeed, the kingdom of God is within you.”
bereanbiblechurch.org/transcripts/eschatology/abom_des.htmDespite the clear words of Jesus, many are looking for a physical kingdom. His kingdom is here now, it came in AD 70, it is a spiritual kingdom, not a physical fleshly kingdom, and it did not come with observation.
Jeremiah 31:31 is speaking of the New Covenant. Jeremiah 31:38 is also speaking of the New Jerusalem which pertains to this same New Covenant. Jesus and His Father are the New Covenant’s Temple. (Revelation 21:22) You cannot separate the two.Jeremiah prophesied of the New Covenant that the Lord will establish with “the house of Israel and the house of Judah,” i.e., the nation of Israel. Also, a favorite theme of his is that the Lord will “restore the fortunes of Israel.”
Ezekiel prophesied of the New Jerusalem, even giving its dimensions.
You’re confusing your O.T. prophets.
Jesus is both God and Man. These cannot be separated in His Person. God’s spirit remains in us (abides in us) only when we do the will of our Father in heaven. (Matthew 7:21, 1 John 2:17)To abide in Christ is to live in the abode of the Spirit that is within us.
Jesus was the man.
Christ is the Spirit.
Matt 16:28 "Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom."I think we find the answer to your question right there in the context. Matt. 17:1-3 says:"Six days later Jesus took with Him Peter and James and John his brother, and *led them up on a high mountain by themselves. And He was transfigured before them; and His face shone like the sun, and His garments became as white as light. And behold, Moses and Elijah appeared to them, talking with Him."Each of the synoptic Gospel accounts follow Christ’s statement with the Transfiguration (Mk. 9:1; Lk. 9:27). No doubt Peter, James and John were privileged among the others to preview, through the Transfiguration, Christ’s coming kingdom on earth. And Peter referred to the Transfiguration in reference to the “power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ” in 2 Pet. 1:16.Matt 24:32-34 "Now learn the parable from the fig tree: when its branch has already become tender and puts forth its leaves, you know that summer is near; so, you too, when you see all these things, recognize that He is near, {right} at the door. "Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place"Well, Ryan, one of the things that that “generation” would see is the second advent of Jesus Christ described in Matt. 24:29-31. None living at that time witnessed that glorious event. Unless you do as the Preterist and spiritualize away His second coming.Oh, then you believe that (Mat 16:28; 24:34) was fulfilled before the last of his disciples died? That is what scripture says after all.
I agree with your view. Most major events are prefigured. The fulfillment is at the end of time for Matthew 24:36-25:46. I think that Matthew 26:64 pertains to the visual observation of Jesus coming with His kingdom at His Second Coming at the end of time; not the present spiritual indwelling of His kingdom within us in our souls/hearts (Luke 17:21).I am more partial to the “single-two sided-response view” about the Temple." In Mat 24:4-35, Jesus gives signs that will precede the Temple’s destruction and In 24:36-25:46 he conceals the precise day and hour of God’s judgment. During the close of the age, the Old Covenant age will terminate with Jerusalem’s destruction. This “closing” is linked with God’s rescue of the righteous and his judgment of the wicked (13:39-43, 48-50). And like I said from the begining, this prefigures Christ’s second coming at the end of time. This view squares with Jesus prediction that all these things would take place within one generation.
How do you explain (Mat 16:28; 24:34; 26:64)? I’m still waiting for moondweller’s response.
I wonder how perhaps a billion+ people will be able to live there in that small land area since when He returns, we shall all always be with Him.The church returns with Christ. Where the Lord is, we are too (by “church” I don’t mean the RCC).
Jesus didn’t expect all but three of them to die within the next six days. I don’t disagree that the transfiguration confirmed Christ’s sonship and majesty, but Jesus wasn’t refering to a preview (Mat 16:28). He was talking about them seeing the earthly evidence of (Dan 7:13-14). The destruction of the Temple was the physical proof of what occured at his ascension.Matt 16:28 “Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.”
I think we find the answer to your question right there in the context. Matt. 17:1-3 says:
“Six days later Jesus took with Him Peter and James and John his brother, and *led them up on a high mountain by themselves. And He was transfigured before them; and His face shone like the sun, and His garments became as white as light. And behold, Moses and Elijah appeared to them, talking with Him.”
Each of the synoptic Gospel accounts follow Christ’s statement with the Transfiguration (Mk. 9:1; Lk. 9:27). No doubt Peter, James and John were privileged among the others to preview, through the Transfiguration, Christ’s coming kingdom on earth. And Peter referred to the Transfiguration in reference to the “power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ” in 2 Pet. 1:16.
Coming (parousia) literally means “presence” and can also denote appearing or visitation. The word “coming” refers both to Christ’s “visitation” of destruction upon Jerusalem as well as to his Second Advent at the end of time. You automatically fast forward to Christ’s return at the end of time, which is not the first sense of this scripture. And I do not spiritualize away his second advent because it hasn’t happened yet.Matt 24:32-34 "Now learn the parable from the fig tree: when its branch has already become tender and puts forth its leaves, you know that summer is near; so, you too, when you see all these things, recognize that He is near, {right} at the door. "Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place"Well, Ryan, one of the things that that “generation” would see is the second advent of Jesus Christ described in Matt. 24:29-31. None living at that time witnessed that glorious event. Unless you do as the Preterist and spiritualize away His second coming.
You are rationalizing!Generation in Greek is genea and can mean “race” or “family.” So what Jesus might be saying is that in spite of terrible persecution the Jewish race will not be exterminated, but will exist to share in the blessings of the Son of David’s Millennial reign on earth.
Thanks for your (name removed by moderator)ut. I would say these were fulfilled, are being fulfilled, and will be fulfilled at the end of time. In the lesson of the flood for example The righteous are left and the wicked are taken. Jesus says “watch therefore” (Mat 24:42) on three levels. The disciples were to look vigilantly for his coming judgment on Jerusalem or they would fail to evacuate the city. They must look to the coming of Christ in the Eucharist to avoid judgment (1 Cor 11:27-29). They must watch for His Second Coming in glory at the end of history.I agree with your view. Most major events are prefigured. The fulfillment is at the end of time for Matthew 24:36-25:46. I think that Matthew 26:64 pertains to the visual observation of Jesus coming with His kingdom at His Second Coming at the end of time; not the present spiritual indwelling of His kingdom within us in our souls/hearts (Luke 17:21).
I agree with you. The final fulfillment is at the end of time. I see what you mean by the judgment of Old Covenant Israel in Ezek. 34:17:22 and by 1 Cor. 11:27-29.Thanks for your (name removed by moderator)ut. I would say these were fulfilled, are being fulfilled, and will be fulfilled at the end of time. In the lesson of the flood for example The righteous are left and the wicked are taken. Jesus says “watch therefore” (Mat 24:42) on three levels. The disciples were to look vigilantly for his coming judgment on Jerusalem or they would fail to evacuate the city. They must look to the coming of Christ in the Eucharist to avoid judgment (1 Cor 11:27-29). They must watch for His Second Coming in glory at the end of history.
The same is true of the Parable of the Ten Bridesmaids. The time of the judgment on Jerusalem, the time of death, and the time of Christ’s return are all unknown. In the parable of the Talents the journey represents the delay between Jesus Ascension and God’s judment on Jerusalem, one’s lifetime, and His second coming. The Judgment of the Nations unfolds at two levels. His Second Coming and the judgment of Old Covenant Israel (Ezek 34:17-22).
Jesus said that the “kingdom of heaven is within us” (Self) therefore you say,Jesus is both God and Man. These cannot be separated in His Person. God’s spirit remains in us (abides in us) only when we do the will of our Father in heaven. (Matthew 7:21, 1 John 2:17)
Pax,
SHW
And between the particular and general judgments the soul is purified (if necessary).And, we are first each judged at the time of our deaths in our own particular judgments which determines where we will spend eternity; heaven or hell. The General Judgment is for all to see in order to witness God’s power and glory (Acts 10:42).
I agree. A good example is the parable of the wheat and tares (Mat 13:24-30, 36-43) where Christ says the rigtheous and the wicked will both grow along side each other until they are separated, judged.The good and bad are judged on the same Day. There are not two different judgments, one for the righteous, and one for the unrighteous, as some persons erroneously believe.
Dan. 7:13-14 is referring to an earthly kingdom which Christ is to be given after the fourth beast (earthly kingdom) is destroyed. His kingdom is essentially a fifth kingdom on earth. It corresponds with Daniel chapter two where it says regarding Christ’s earthly kingdom to comeJesus didn’t expect all but three of them to die within the next six days. I don’t disagree that the transfiguration confirmed Christ’s sonship and majesty, but Jesus wasn’t refering to a preview (Mat 16:28). He was talking about them seeing the earthly evidence of (Dan 7:13-14). The destruction of the Temple was the physical proof of what occured at his ascension.
Not really. He said this genea will not pass away until ALL the previous events take place. That would include (1) Daniel’s Abomination of Desolation, which, contrary to SHW insistence, did not take place in 70 A.D., history bears this out; (2) the great Tribulation; (3) the rise of false prophets with great signs and wonders; (4) the second advent of Christ immediately following the Tribulation with His appearing in the sky and ALL the tribes of the earth witness it and see Him returning with power and great glory; (5) and the angels gathering His elect.Your senario implies that Jesus was pulling the wool over the disciples eyes with virtually meaningless statements that could wait almost forever, as long as there remained a distinct Jewish race. The plain truth is that Jesus was specifically answering a WHEN question from His disciples. He was speaking of events that would occur in forty to sixty years.
His kingdom will include the whole earth, you know. The church returns to reign with Him, but it is possible her actual abode will be the New Jerusalem itself. Unlike the inhabitants on earth at that time, the church will have received their glorified bodies and commuting to and fro will be no problem.**Moondweller **states that the Church will be with Christ when He rules in a physical kingdom in the State of Israel in Jerusalem: I wonder how perhaps a billion+ people will be able to live there in that small land area since when He returns, we shall all always be with Him.
1 Thessalonians 4:17 “Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And thus we shall always be with the Lord.”
There you have it. During the fourth kingdom (Roman empire), the Messianic Kingdom will be established.Dan. 7:13-14 is referring to an earthly kingdom which Christ is to be given after the fourth beast (earthly kingdom) is destroyed. His kingdom is essentially a fifth kingdom on earth. It corresponds with Daniel chapter two where it says regarding Christ’s earthly kingdom to comean 2:34-35 “You continued looking until a stone was cut out without hands, and it struck the statue on its feet of iron and clay and crushed them. Then the iron, the clay, the bronze, the silver and the gold were crushed all at the same time and became like chaff from the summer threshing floors; and the wind carried them away so that not a trace of them was found. But the stone that struck the statue became a great mountain and filled the whole earth.”
Dan 2:44 “In the days of those kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom which will never be destroyed, and {that} kingdom will not be left for another people; it will crush and put an end to all these kingdoms, but it will itself endure forever.”
Do you understand what apocalyptic language is?None of these occurred 40-60 years after Christ’s words were spoken. None of them have occurred yet. The events He describes don’t even begin to resemble the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. by Titus. Matt. 24:27-31 describes Christ’s glorious second advent when ALL the peoples of the earth will see it. To say it refers to the destruction of 70 A.D. is a pitiful, pitiful interpretation, indeed.
Moondweller,His kingdom will include the whole earth, you know. The church returns to reign with Him, but it is possible her actual abode will be the New Jerusalem itself. Unlike the inhabitants on earth at that time, the church will have received their glorified bodies and commuting to and fro will be no problem.