blackforest
Well-known member
The USCCB already did it for me. I’m not going to link to it for the twentieth time in two months because I need to get my kiddos to class. Enjoy any last words, and I’ll reconnect tonight.
The policy is unique to the Trump administration. Previous administrations did not, as a general principle, separate all families crossing the U.S. border illegally. And the current administration could choose to end this practice and release families together from detention at any time.
I’m aware of history.So treating people - including the undeserving - as we would Christ is 1st century barbarism now?
Guess what - we’re ALL undeserving. And corruption, war.and mass migration were nothing new in Jesus’ day. Read your history.
It bounces all over the place.Read the article.
See above link regarding the facts.But immigration advocates and legal experts say that there are other options, including those that previous administrations have chosen.
The Obama administration established family detention centers that kept families together while their cases were processed.
However, those centers were sharply criticized for keeping children detained even if they were still with their parents. A court ruled that those detention centers violated the Flores agreement and that families should be released together.
The Obama White House also had a policy of releasing families through a program called Alternatives to Detention that still allowed them to be closely supervised — for instance, by giving mothers ankle monitors before releasing them.
The ACLU welcomed the Alternatives to Detention program, but other immigrant-rights groups had reservations.
As Burnett reported, one for-profit prison company that was making money off immigrant detention was also profiting off those ankle monitor systems.
ICE tells NPR that the Alternatives to Detention program is still active under the Trump administration, but Trump has repeatedly said he opposes what he denounces as “catch and release.”
It’s a Trend! No different then other things in society. It’ll pass and people will forget how appalled they were.It’s just fashionable to bring up now.
Families that request asylum at ports of entry are meant to be kept together while their claims are processed.
But there is evidence that even families who seek asylum at ports of entry are being separated. One high-profile case involves a Congolese woman who sought asylum and still was separated from her 7-year-old daughter. In February, NPR’s Burnett reported on the legal battle of Ms. L v. ICE.
What Is Asylum?
Seeking asylum means asking the U.S. to accept you — legally — because of persecution you are facing in your home country.
Crossing the border illegally is a misdemeanor; for a person who has already been deported once, it’s a felony. Both types of crimes are currently being prosecuted with no exceptions, even if a person later requests asylum.
Seeking asylum at a port of entry, however, is not a crime at all.
Hers is not an isolated case, according to immigrant advocates.