in the first 10 second they called her a dumb ***** and they were laughing and laughing before she even asked the worker why it was not a private way.
Yes that set her off. and she made a statement, “you want to kill me” and then he’s laughing and put words in her mouth by saying “because I am black”
She was wrong and wrong to assault the man. You can shine it up but it still remains there. The woman had no right to touch him, no matter if he laughed at her or not. . . .
She didn’t even hear or react to that which was said very quietly.Motherwit:
in the first 10 second they called her a dumb *****
Let the video speak for itself. I’m genuinely shocked that you can falsify that sequence even though the video is there in your own post.
She heard it. He called her a dumb *****.gam197:
She didn’t even hear or react to that which was said very quietly.
You apparently don’t hear them laughing and laughing as they knew she was a fool and he was having a great time with ridicule and videotaping her.gam197:
Let the video speak for itself. I’m genuinely shocked that you can falsify that sequence even though the video is there in your own post.
The problem with video is that it only shows that which the one holding the camera captures. It does not show what lead up to the camera being brought out. I do not doubt that fame chasers create confrontation and then flip the script when they bring out the phone. The message here is to avoid this type of confrontation. Assume it is a trap. Most of all, watch what you say. The woman admitted, without thinking, she was doing what she was because the man was black. I do not even know if she heard the question.
I think it’s crazy to imply they initiated the confrontation: How? When we know she was asking them to be removed from a public space thinking they had no right to be there? When people in public laugh at you telling them to do things u’ve no right to tell them to do or look funny, they are not “initiating” anything.
This woman is a Russian refuge and is here on passport and had her passport taken away. She apparently thought it was a private area and was informed it was not. I do not think she had a clue and these men knew it and that is why they called her a dumb ***** at the beginning. They were laughing and laughing at her, ridiculing her because they saw her as a fool and she proved them right.
I don’t care how often you try to make laughing an attack. Once she was told they could be there, if she was genuinely mistaken, she would’ve apologized for the mistake and gone about her day. You think laughing is a big attack on her and yet her provocation of strangers in public and slapping them on the arm is a nothing burger to you. Ur bias is incredible. I’m not interested in arguing with you any further seeing your style of argument from another thread on a simple-to-understand law.
Yes it is if the first thing out of his mouth is she is a dumb ***** and is laughing and laughing. I agree that once she was told it was a public way and not a private way, she should have realized she was wrong.
Really! I post a lot of threads on all kinds of crimes. I post some on black crime because there are a number of threads on white on black crime which there should be. I think she was wrong in her attitude but I did not like that they were provoking the exchange by calling her a dumb ***** in the first 10 seconds and then kept laughing and laughing as they showed her to be a fool. What about words into her mouth. That is what bothered me about the video.
I did not imply they initiated the confrontation. I said we do not know what else happened. I said in situations like this it is best to assume someone may be trying to goad you to get on the internet, that is, a trap.
There could be more before and after what was shown in the OP’s video but the OP distorted the sequence of what was shown to make it appear as if the woman was the harassed innocent party and the black guys were the aggressors.Motherwit:
The problem with video is that it only shows that which the one holding the camera captures. It does not show what lead up to the camera being brought out. I do not doubt that fame chasers create confrontation and then flip the script when they bring out the phone. The message here is to avoid this type of confrontation. Assume it is a trap. Most of all, watch what you say. The woman admitted, without thinking, she was doing what she was because the man was black. I do not even know if she heard the question.
What crime?
Maybe women who harrass people in public spaces as if they own it or those people have earned the contempt they get. Not that its Catholic to call them names, but I won’t pretend to be angry at those who respond in anger to entitled people like these woman. Sorry, but black people no longer have to be polite to just any white person who feels entitled to authority over them as they go about their business in public spaces. Good luck getting those statutes back into law.
How do you know she’s entitled? Isn’t that a rather prejudiced remark?
When people act entitled, I know they’re entitled. Unlike you who sees anti-woman hate and imaginary crimes when harassing women are insulted in anger.
Says the person who accuses another of an imaginary anti-woman hate crime. PS: I don’t care what you say you see. I’m sure if she had spit on them and called them the N word from the start, you’d still be here twisting yourself into a pretzel saying they had done it to themselves, somehow.