The video stands for itself and anyone can listen to the video. I did not distort the sequence. He calls her dumb ***** at the beginning of the video. I never said the woman was the harrassed innocent party or that the black guys were the agressors. These are your words.
Which has no influence on whether or not striking someone is a crime.
Her wrong assumption also has no bearing on whether or not striking someone is a crime.
She exercised her own free speech during the encounter. Had she only done that, then there might not have been any crime (though harassment is a possibility).
She then may have done better to mind her own business or complain to a property manager instead of policing people herself.
That is often done when there is a risk person may flee trial before the justice process is complete.
Thus, she started the confrontation on a false basis.
The tape starts with him calling her a dumb ***** as he is taping her. Yes she does ask the worker if this a private way and the worker tells her certain parts of the road are a public way. She doesn’t get that she is being taped and persists in trying to understand why some areas are private and others not.gam197:
Which has no influence on whether or not striking someone is a crime.
Her wrong assumption also has no bearing on whether or not striking someone is a crime.
She exercised her own free speech during the encounter. Had she only done that, then there might not have been any crime (though harassment is a possibility).
She then may have done better to mind her own business or complain to a property manager instead of policing people herself.
That is often done when there is a risk person may flee trial before the justice process is complete.
Thus, she started the confrontation on a false basis.
Yes, yes. You’ve repeated the same things to defend the aggressor without adding anything new…
“Defending the agressor” is your words not mine. The video speaks for itself and anyone can listen to it. I am just stating how it started.gam197:
Yes, yes. You’ve repeated the same things to defend the aggressor without adding anything new…
abc7chicago.com
It is a private beach but apparently he was on a public access pathway and she did not seem to understand that. There may be a longer video but I have yet to see or listen to it.
There are several video clips. There is also witness testimony, and the police came out to interview those involved. Someone else in the group started to record when she demanded to see their passes and she goes off to get Grace, the employee. There is also video of the woman’s arrest. The other clips are not as interesting, and there are licensing fees to pay to include it in a story. That may be a factor in why the link tou posted only has one of the video clips.
Could you post the longer version video where she confronts them? We know that she got arrested as the original article shows her mug shot.
Video clips. And no. I don’t post links to content that contains cursing. I’m not trying to get a moderation strike.
There are a lot of things known. But part of the apparent theme of this thread is needless repetition. In the spirit of that:
I did not realize that. Could you pm me the video so I can view it or link it to an article so I can comment?gam197:
Video clips. And no. I don’t post links to content that contains cursing. I’m not trying to get a moderation strike.
I prefer not to use the PM functionality at all. Also, it feels like there is a lack of interest in considering any information that in her defense. If you’d like to find the additional information trace the story back to it’s sources.
Then you are acknowledging that she performed an action that resulted in a justification for charges being filed against her and the justice process being used.
The common sense position.Rubee:
I did not imply they initiated the confrontation. I said we do not know what else happened. I said in situations like this it is best to assume someone may be trying to goad you to get on the internet, that is, a trap.
We do not know what happened prior to the video starting. The recording clearly starts in the middle of the this mess. We do know the woman is charged with assault.
I’ve look but can’t find the longer video you speak of. Could you link an article with video?gam197:
I prefer not to use the PM functionality at all. Also, it feels like there is a lack of interest in considering any information that in her defense. If you’d like to find the additional information trace the story back to it’s sources.
Virtually all assaults and murders are ‘hate crimes’
Sometimes a good strategy can be to walk away, especially if nothing is to be gained. Responses to videos posted on the internet can be cruel.
It was misdemeanor battery. That charge was dropped and she faces class 4 felony hate crime instead.
Src
Are you saying that virtually all assaults and murders are because of that group or person’s perceived race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation or physical or mental disability?
Try going to a private beach area and see if you don’t get called out. People around water think they own the lake and don’t want you near it. That is why they have park workers at all these private beach areas.