Who was the first Christian?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xavierlives
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Holy Mother, the Virgin Mary.
Christian means the follower of Christ. Our Holy Mother Mary is not a follower of Christ. Mary is the Mother of all Christians (too bad some denied her completely). Together with Christ, Mary can be called the co-redeemer, or mediatrix. The first Christian must be the Apostles.
 
I understand what you mean by Chrisitan but I respectfully disagree with you. In Luke 1:31-35 I see no evidence that Mary knew Jesus was God incarnated. V.31 says you will have a son and you are to name him Jesus. V.32 says He will be great and will be called the Son of God. V.35 once again says that He will be called the Son of God. I see nowhere where it states that Mary knew Jesus was God. She knew he was the Son of God but not God Himself. I also beleive that Mary was Jewish and not a Christian before Jesus and after Jesus was born. She raised Jesus in the Jewish customs, as it is evident when she and Joseph presented Jesus to God in the temple and other Jewish customs that are present in the Bible that they observed. I see nowhere in the Bible were it states that Mary knew Jesus was God. If I’m not correct please give me the book and verse in the Bible where it states that Mary knew Jesus was God and not just the Son of God. I understand your logic but I see no evidence to back your claim.
Let me clear up a couple of points… first; Mary was chosen by God before He came to her through the Holy Spirit. Second; When she visited her cousin Elizabeth … and her exclamation … Mary ponder these things in her heart, Third; Mary and Joseph were practicing Jews and … many of the early Christians were Jews that did not realize that they were Christians, Fourth; read the Gospel of John … not everything that happened was written down, some of this was passed down as tradition ( Tradition ) and is accepted by those that accept that God can work through us and not everything has to be written in Scripture or it can not be accepted. Please look at hese these ideas and ponder them in your heart as Mary did … doing this may help you to better understand God’s will in our lives.
 
I have an opinion on this matter but I’d like to hear the Catholic/Non-Catholic take one who was the first Christian?

If you can point to some scripture, it would be helpful (but not necessary).
John the Baptist!
 
Yes I have. If you read my posts you will see that I have given evidence from the Bible that she knew that Jesus was the Son of God but not God Himself.
“Son of God” is the same thing as “God.” When Jesus told the Jews that He was the Son of God, they were going to stone Him, and they began their plot to have Him crucified, because they knew that He was calling Himself God. Mary was part of that same culture - she, too, would have realized that “the Son of God” is actually God. 🙂
 
God follows Himself? I am confused.
Yes, one could argue that given Jesus the Son followed God the Father by doing His Will. If you believe that Christianity is the truth and God created this as the means of salvation, God Himself would be the first Christian (because He was Christ) and would thus believe He is the Truth, the Way and the Light.
 
“Son of God” is the same thing as “God.” When Jesus told the Jews that He was the Son of God, they were going to stone Him, and they began their plot to have Him crucified, because they knew that He was calling Himself God. Mary was part of that same culture - she, too, would have realized that “the Son of God” is actually God. 🙂
So simple the way you put it. A person only looks foolish if they deny this without acknowledging how easy it is to believe.👍
 
Let me clear up a couple of points… first; Mary was chosen by God before He came to her through the Holy Spirit. Second; When she visited her cousin Elizabeth … and her exclamation … Mary ponder these things in her heart, Third; Mary and Joseph were practicing Jews and … many of the early Christians were Jews that did not realize that they were Christians, Fourth; read the Gospel of John … not everything that happened was written down, some of this was passed down as tradition ( Tradition ) and is accepted by those that accept that God can work through us and not everything has to be written in Scripture or it can not be accepted. Please look at hese these ideas and ponder them in your heart as Mary did … doing this may help you to better understand God’s will in our lives.
Sorry I disagree with you.
 
“Son of God” is the same thing as “God.” When Jesus told the Jews that He was the Son of God, they were going to stone Him, and they began their plot to have Him crucified, because they knew that He was calling Himself God. Mary was part of that same culture - she, too, would have realized that “the Son of God” is actually God. 🙂
You are the son of your father, does that make you your father. If someone says that you are the son of your father will that person they are telling think you are your father. Give me clear evidence that Mary knew Jesus was God and not just the Son of God. I have asked and asked but I get she must have known, or do you think she is stupid and didn’t know. By Jesus saying that he was the Son of God the Jews said that was blasphemy.
We know today that the Son of God is the same as God but I don’t think they, back then, knew this. Jesus was new to them and they did not know all we know today about who Jesus is. If someone today said that he was the Son of God would you believe him, would you think he was a nut, crazy and speaking blasphemy. Of course you would, so it was no different back then. You say that they ploted to have him crucified because they knew that he was calling himself God. Ok, I don’t believe they really thought he was God but just calling himself that which is blasphemy.
 
Why is it that when things get heavy its always meant to be fun.
Well I didn’t start this “hijack” as you put it. Here’s the breakdown.
Post 45 I respond to original post without Mary
Post 46 jmcrae responded to my post 45 with Mary
Post 47 Dokimas responded to post 46 jmcrae questioning Mary
Post 48 Benadam responded to post 47
Post 49 2nd adam responded to post 45
Post 50 bendecida mentioned Mary
Post 52 bill pick responded to post 47
Post 53 dokimas responded to post 52
Post 60 is my first responce to post 46
Post 69 jmcrae responded to my post 60
Post 72 I responded to and asked jmcrae to show me evidence
Post 74 jmcrae responded to my post 72
Post 75 whm responded to my post 72
Post 78 I resopnded to post 74 jmcrae
Post 80 jmcrae responded to my post 78
Post 83 I responded to post 80 jmcrae
Post 84 jmrcae responded to my post 83
Post 85 I responded to post 84 jmcrae
Post 86 jmcrae responded to my post 85
Post 87 bill pick responded to my post 85
Post 88 I responded to post 87
Post 89 I responded to post 86 jmcrae
Post 90 jmcrae responded to my post 89
Post 91 I responded to post 90 jmcrae
Post 92 you responded to my post 91 about hijack
Post 93 benadam responded to my post 91
Post 94 I responded to post 93 benadam
and this is post 95 my responce to your post 92
As you can see I did not start the hijack thing but it seems that I am to blame for it. I made no mention of Mary in my original post all I did was to ask jmcrae to show me evidence of his claim.
yeah, if it’s a hijacking I think there is more than one terrorist . 😊 It can still be fun tho. I think I got this who became aware that Jesus is God thing pinned down.

**47 And all that heard him were astonished at his wisdom and his answers. **
**48 And seeing him, they wondered. **

The routine of life seems to have faded the awe and wonder experienced 12 years ago

**behold thy father and I have sought thee **

*This sentence means alot, because of how Jesus responds *

**How is it that you sought me? **

Jesus and His mother are not speaking about the same kind of seeking. To Jesus they have not sought him correctly or else they would have known what he say’s next

**did you not know, that I must be about my father’s business? **

*Jesus at 12 reveals His divinity to His parents. *

50 And they understood not the word that he spoke unto them. **

I’m thinking that the Holy Spirit will remind them of the Incarnation and they will understand the Word spoken to them.

**---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- **

The demonstration that Mary understand the Word spoken to her when Jesus was 12 and has found her Divine Son

John intoduces the wedding in connection with the marriage of the Lamb. The New heaven and the New earth. The Resurrection


John 2

1 And the third day, there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee: and** the mother of Jesus was there.** ( speaks of Mary’s unique cooperation and Assumption)

**the mother of Jesus saith to him: They have no wine. **

Mary doesn’t even need to ask but to present to Jesus the good that is lacking. She asks in a manner and for a good that is only fitting coming from a woman who knows her son is divine. Providing the wine by ordianry means is not the sense as Jesus’ response shows.

4 And Jesus saith to her: Woman, what is that to me and to thee? my hour is not yet come.

Again Jesus addresses her in union with Himself as the New Man because He is acknowledging the connections to their futures she is seeing and responding to in the symbols surrounding this event.

**5 His mother saith to the waiters: Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye. **

She is confident of who He is and that this wedding is the sign of the eternal wedding of heaven and earth that Her Son will make happen or else she couldn’t be confident about the miracle He is about to make happen that becomes for us now as it is to her then, eternities foreshadow.
 
You are the son of your father, does that make you your father.
It makes me to be my father’s heir, with all of the same rights, property, and privileges as my father. To do business with me is the same thing as to do business with my father; I have equal authority with him in our family business, as far as the employees and customers are concerned.
By Jesus saying that he was the Son of God the Jews said that was blasphemy
.

Right, but it would not be blasphemy if all it meant was that he is especially blest by God, since they already knew that he was a miracle worker; they did not doubt that he was blest by God, but they went ballistic when He said that He was the Son of God - they said, “This man is making himself equal with God; he is saying that he is God.”
 
It makes me to be my father’s heir, with all of the same rights, property, and privileges as my father. To do business with me is the same thing as to do business with my father; I have equal authority with him in our family business, as far as the employees and customers are concerned.

Right, but it would not be blasphemy if all it meant was that he is especially blest by God, since they already knew that he was a miracle worker; they did not doubt that he was blest by God, but they went ballistic when He said that He was the Son of God - they said, “This man is making himself equal with God; he is saying that he is God.”
Although you are your fathers heir with all the same rights, property and privileges as you father and to do business with you is the same as doing business with your father in you family business does not maky you your father. I makes you a part of the business but not your father, Its impossable to be your father, You may be like him but you will never be him.

I beleive what I said was. " you say that they ploted to have him crucified because they knew he was callilng himself God. I don’t believe they really thought he was God but just calling himself that, which is blasphemy." So what is the difference between what I said and what you said?? I believe we both say that he was calling himself God.
Mark 14:61 " Then the priest asked him Are you the Messiah, the Son of the blessed God? {62} Jesus said, I am, and you will see me, the Son of Man, sitting at God’s right hand in the place of power and coming back on the clouds of heaven. {63} Then the priest tore his clotheing to show his horror and said, Why do we need other witnesses? You have all heard his {blasphemy}. What is your verdict? And they all condemned him to death." You are right it would not be blasphemy because today we k;now that Jesus is God but back then they didn’t believe Jesus was God so they claimed he was speaking blasphemy.
 
I beleive what I said was. " you say that they ploted to have him crucified because they knew he was callilng himself God. I don’t believe they really thought he was God but just calling himself that, which is blasphemy." So what is the difference between what I said and what you said?? I believe we both say that he was calling himself God.
Right. So then, why wouldn’t Mary have also understood Him to mean that He was God, when she knew that she was bearing the Son of God? Since she was part of the same culture and language as the priests and pharisees.
Mark 14:61 " Then the priest asked him Are you the Messiah, the Son of the blessed God? {62} Jesus said, I am, and you will see me, the Son of Man, sitting at God’s right hand in the place of power and coming back on the clouds of heaven. {63} Then the priest tore his clotheing to show his horror and said, Why do we need other witnesses? You have all heard his {blasphemy}. What is your verdict? And they all condemned him to death." You are right it would not be blasphemy because today we k;now that Jesus is God but back then they didn’t believe Jesus was God so they claimed he was speaking blasphemy.
I wasn’t saying that they believed it; I was saying that Mary believed it.
 
Right. So then, why wouldn’t Mary have also understood Him to mean that He was God, when she knew that she was bearing the Son of God? Since she was part of the same culture and language as the priests and pharisees.

I wasn’t saying that they believed it; I was saying that Mary believed it.
Your statements contradict eachother.
If Mary was of the same culture and language as the priests and pharisees were and they didn’t believe he was God. You said "why wouldn’t Mary have also understood him to mean that he was God. The word “mean” is different then “knowing” he was God. So what you are saying by using the word mean is that Mary really didn’t know he was God. You said it your self, Mary was of the same culture and language as the priests and the pharisees were means that you believe Mary believed the same thing about Jesus as the priests and pharisees did that was Jesus was not God but calling himself God.
 
Your statements contradict eachother.
If Mary was of the same culture and language as the priests and pharisees were and they didn’t believe he was God. You said "why wouldn’t Mary have also understood him to mean that he was God. The word “mean” is different then “knowing” he was God. So what you are saying by using the word mean is that Mary really didn’t know he was God. You said it your self, Mary was of the same culture and language as the priests and the pharisees were means that you believe Mary believed the same thing about Jesus as the priests and pharisees did that was Jesus was not God but calling himself God.
Okay. Let’s break this down. The Pharisees understood Jesus to mean “I am God” when He said, “I am the Son of God.” Right? That’s why they crucified him.

Mary also, therefore, (because she came from the same culture and held the same assumptions about what things mean) should have understood, when the Angel Gabriel told her, “You will give birth to the Son of God” - same phrase, notice - she should have understood from that, that her Son was God. Notice how she believed what he told her and said, 'Be it done unto me according to thy word," instead of “Pshaw, you’re kidding me. Try another one.”

Mary believed it; that’s why she said “Yes.”

The Pharisees did not believe it; that’s why they crucified Him.
 
Your statements contradict eachother.
If Mary was of the same culture and language as the priests and pharisees were and they didn’t believe he was God. You said "why wouldn’t Mary have also understood him to mean that he was God. The word “mean” is different then “knowing” he was God. So what you are saying by using the word mean is that Mary really didn’t know he was God. You said it your self, Mary was of the same culture and language as the priests and the pharisees were means that you believe Mary believed the same thing about Jesus as the priests and pharisees did that was Jesus was not God but calling himself God.
Did I mention that Peter, Paul, the apostles, etc. were all of the culture? Yet they believed he was God therefore it is possible for many people to move beyond the culture and see Jesus as He really is. The NT itself is proof of this.

Taking your logic to the extreme, the only people could now Jesus is God is only the Trinity or the Gentiles or only the believers today but the existence of the NT and how Christianity has flourished is proof that this theory doesn’t fly.

Therefore, it is not possible to use Jewish culture as proof. If Paul, the Pharisees of the Pharisees, could believe is possible (and logically) that Mary knew that Jesus is God.

Your thoughts…
 
yeah, if it’s a hijacking I think there is more than one terrorist . 😊 It can still be fun tho. I think I got this who became aware that Jesus is God thing pinned down.

47 And all that heard him were astonished at his wisdom and his answers.
48 And seeing him, they wondered.

The routine of life seems to have faded the awe and wonder experienced 12 years ago

**behold thy father and I have sought thee **

*This sentence means alot, because of how Jesus responds *

**How is it that you sought me? **

Jesus and His mother are not speaking about the same kind of seeking. To Jesus they have not sought him correctly or else they would have known what he say’s next

**did you not know, that I must be about my father’s business? **

*Jesus at 12 reveals His divinity to His parents. *

50 And* they* understood not the word that he spoke unto them.

I’m thinking that the Holy Spirit will remind them of the Incarnation and they will understand the Word spoken to them.

**---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- **

The demonstration that Mary understand the Word spoken to her when Jesus was 12 and has found her Divine Son

John intoduces the wedding in connection with the marriage of the Lamb. The New heaven and the New earth. The Resurrection


John 2

1 And the third day, there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee: and** the mother of Jesus was there.** ( speaks of Mary’s unique cooperation and Assumption)

**the mother of Jesus saith to him: They have no wine. **

Mary doesn’t even need to ask but to present to Jesus the good that is lacking. She asks in a manner and for a good that is only fitting coming from a woman who knows her son is divine. Providing the wine by ordianry means is not the sense as Jesus’ response shows.

4
And Jesus saith to her: Woman, what is that to me and to thee? my hour is not yet come.

Again Jesus addresses her in union with Himself as the New Man because He is acknowledging the connections to their futures she is seeing and responding to in the symbols surrounding this event.

5
His mother saith to the waiters: Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye.

She is confident of who He is and that this wedding is the sign of the eternal wedding of heaven and earth that Her Son will make happen or else she couldn’t be confident about the miracle He is about to make happen that becomes for us now as it is to her then, eternities foreshadow.
I didn’t make the claim of hijack, Xavierlives did in post 92

That does not prove that they knew he was God.To me it proves that they thought him to be a prophet or a good teacher, but not God.
Lets get it straight I said in my original post that I thought Christ was the first Christian. Then it blew up because some one said that Mary was the first Christian and that she knew he was God. And that’s where it all started. Because of the other person.
John 2:1-5 Weddings in Jesus’ day wer week long festivals. Banquets would be prepared for many guests and the week would be spent celebrating the new life of the married couple. To run out of wine was more thatn embarrasing, it broke the strong unwritten laws of hospitality, Jesus responded to a heartfelt need. Now Mary was probably not asking Jesus to do a miracle, she was sismply hoping that her son would help solve this major problem and find some wine. Tradition says that Joseph was dead so she probably was used to asking for he son’s help in certain situatuons. Jesus’ answer to Mary is diffucult to understand, but maybe that is the point. Although Mary didn’t understand what Jesus was going to do, she trusted him to do what was right. Mary submitted to Jesus’ way of doing things. She recognized that Jesus was nore than her human son, he was the Son of God.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top