Why Catholics Should Vote for Trump article

  • Thread starter Thread starter Limoncello4021
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m voting for Kanye West, at least I like his music, cant say anything I like about the other two guys.

If America is going to down, the music played in the background should be AWESOME.
I don’t particularly care for Kim Kardashian as first lady though or letting the Kardashians have the run of the White House. They would be doing inappropriate selfies from every room.
 
And I’d say whatever qualms President Trump might have given Catholic voters in 2016 should not be an obstacle to voting for his re-election. His actually policies have been quite just, except in the eyes of those who prefer to give handouts to the poor rather than work at a just wage.
 
Not interested in reading biased news articles.

I’m asking you:
Which ones specifically and how did they achieve better results?

Who has the most deaths per capita?

Are things “spiking” because we are doing more testing? Does it matter if cases are “spiking” if our hospitals are able to handle this “spiking?”
If you can’t answer these questions don’t bother replying.
 
@Elizabeth3

I am out of likes already today, but your posts are spot on. You have made some
very good replies - especially addressing President Trump’s response to the coronavirus.
 
40.png
7_Sorrows:
They would be doing inappropriate selfies from every room.
might be a welcome relief from inappropriate tweets, though.
Evidently you haven’t seen the Kardashian selfies - no comparison.
 
I resolve it because it never happened. It’s made-up fabricated news, which seems to have been debunked by the intelligence community.

You want wussy? How about Obama, apologizing to and fawning all over the Iranians while delivering them planeloads of cash.
@VonDerTann

I am out of likes today, but I am enjoying reading your posts today.
 
Inappropriate selfies vs inappropriate tweets, pick your poison
Exactly…inappropriate selfies are offensive to the senses; inappropriate tweets are offensive to common sense. Both are offensive, and neither should be judged as “better” than the other.
 
Last edited:
40.png
F_Marturana:
Other countries had better response. We’ve had the most deaths, and it’s spiking over many parts of the country.
Which ones specifically and how did they achieve better results?

Who has the most deaths per capita?

Are things “spiking” because we are doing more testing? Does it matter if cases are “spiking” if our hospitals are able to handle this “spiking?”
@Welshrabbit

Great response. You also have written some good responses today as well!
 
Thank you friend!

My goal is to get my brothers and sisters to think a little more, maybe look a little closer at various issues and not to belittle or put down.

So much of what we see in today’s media, from both liberal and conservative sides is just garbage. I realize it’s difficult when people spend their entire lives being inundated with propaganda to try and see things a little bit differently.

We all need to be asking questions and pushing back on the idea that news organizations don’t have an agenda and can therefore be trusted without being questioned.

Have a great rest of your Sunday!
 
You too!

I agree!!

I wanted to post earlier, but it would not let me post 3 replies in a row…

and I have no more likes left today. @Welshrabbit
 
Last edited:
When we say “we” have had the most deaths, are you referring to the USA?

–Do you really, REALLY believe China’s official death toll? No one does. For that matter, essentially no one believes anything China says about the Wuhan Flu at all – China claimed zero deaths in the entire months of March & April (just before they went into a second lockdown). Some sources put China’s death toll at well over 500,000, perhaps as high as several million. For example, Radio Free Asia pegged it at 400,000 as of March.

Even the (lying) US mainstream media is careful to report deaths in other nations as “confirmed,” to escape having to say what everyone knows, namely, that China’s reported deaths are so low as to be fabricated.
 
Last edited:
And I’d say whatever qualms President Trump might have given Catholic voters in 2016 should not be an obstacle to voting for his re-election.
His abortion position is a problem for Catholics. His death penalty position is a problem for Catholics. His immigration and asylum positions are an issue, that is if you follow the USCCB and the Pope. His treatment of women should be a big problem for Catholics too… all of those things remain
 
His abortion position is a problem for Catholics. H
Biden supports abortion through the day of birth. Think of it. A baby in the birth canal can be murdered, cut into pieces; that anyone, anywhere calling himself a Catholic could vote for Biden is horrible.

He officiated at a gay marriage. He was part of the Obama administration’s attack on nuns. The Democratic party has begun a slow, remorseless campaign to take away the rights of religious Americans.

Catholics can no longer take cover behind a seamless garment argument or behind various gay bishops who lead lifestyles that would cause a saint a heart attack. No, the choice is ugly and it is bitter, but it is crystal clear. You either vote as a Catholic for a flawed candidate or you vote for someone who will promote the mass murder of little babies.

Furthermore, it quite clear to anyone who has ever dealt with dementia patients that he is in an early stage of dementia.
 
Be honest, farron: Trump has had to deal with the most vicious haters imaginable, at literally every turn, including from his own party. The vitriol and viciousness leveled at him; and his wife; and his son Barron ; is straight out of the mouth of hell - and you call that “not heaping praise on him?” Or say that it makes him “disgruntled?”
This is well-stated. Thank you.

Kind of frightening, too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top