F
friardchips
Guest
God is Good. So good would exist without evil.Without evil there is also no good.
God is Good. So good would exist without evil.Without evil there is also no good.
Darkness, confusion, etc.But we need to go simpler still. I am not about human actions. Think in terms of light. What is evil, in itself?
- this is the action of the will as a response to God directly and/or the good in existence which He has Willed.
The absence of the good is evil.God is Good. So good would exist without evil.
God is good without bad. Maybe the question then is this, ‘can God create another God?’ Is anything that God creates necessarily perfect only by degrees, with a perfection relative to and inherently less than His perfection, and therefore “evil” even if only minutely so?Is it possible to have good without bad ?
Doubt it , simply because you can’t have action without reaction
You can’t have a positive without a negative ,
Basic science,
Is the Devil irresistible?Yes, Devil and myself but not always.
You proposed:Where are you heading with this question?
So I wondered what prevents you from always doing good. Why has God created you without the power to resist the Devil?We could live in a perfect universe which we always do good.
It’s generally not accepted as possible, including with God. A universe where people have free will but always choose good is like a square circle. It’s not an applicable concept. A person that God creates with free will is, in a way, a god, and gods will do what gods do. They are not bound by algorithmic/Calvinistic mechanisms.I agree with all you said but I think you didn’t get my argument.
Confusion is an attributed effect in relation to perception as a measure of order.confusion, etc.
Depends what you mean by darkness. Darkness in itself could be seen in relation to light from the sun. Remember, we are trying to reach a decent summary of what evil, is. What is darkness, spiritually? (think about what or who is light, spiritually).Darkness
It’s generally not accepted as possible, including with God. A universe where people have free will but always choose good is like a square circle. It’s not an applicable concept. A person that God creates with free will is, in a way, a god, and gods will do what gods do. They are not bound by algorithmic/Calvinistic mechanisms.
St Aquinas addresses this question in his Summa. The question being that in order to prevent the reprobate, that God might either use his foreknowledge to not create those who would chose evil, or inhibit their free will from acting in that way. Aquinas argues that in the former - if the future actions of a reprobate are going to determine/dictate what God does, then it would be an instance of evil triumphing over good, or coercing good, which is inconceivable and contrary to Divine supremacy. A person who chooses evil must live with those choices. In the later, if God were to create free will and then inhibit free will from acting in an evil way, then it is functionally identical, or de facto identical, to not having free will, and it would not be love.
Going by this logic, then, someone who is truly free, is only free because they can do evil?
Yes.Is the Devil irresistible?
Ok.You proposed:
Think of two possible universe in which in one people always do good and in another people sometimes do evil. These are two universes and God have to power to create the one He wishes. Could we agree on this fact?So I wondered what prevents you from always doing good. Why has God created you without the power to resist the Devil?
tee
It is not really square circle. It is possible. Think of all universes that we could do so and so. The number of these universes is huge. It is very possible to find one universe that people only do good in that universe.It’s generally not accepted as possible, including with God. A universe where people have free will but always choose good is like a square circle. It’s not an applicable concept. A person that God creates with free will is, in a way, a god, and gods will do what gods do. They are not bound by algorithmic/Calvinistic mechanisms.
We are talking about another problem. We are not suggesting to not create the person who will commit evil instead create the universe that all people do good always.St Aquinas addresses this question in his Summa. The question being that in order to prevent the reprobate, that God might either use his foreknowledge to not create those who would chose evil, or inhibit their free will from acting in that way. Aquinas argues that in the former - if the future actions of a reprobate are going to determine/dictate what God does, then it would be an instance of evil triumphing over good, or coercing good, which is inconceivable and contrary to Divine supremacy. A person who chooses evil must live with those choices. In the later, if God were to create free will and then inhibit free will from acting in an evil way, then it is functionally identical, or de facto identical, to not having free will, and it would not be love.
Very good questions.Going by this logic, then, someone who is truly free, is only free because they can do evil?
And it is the ‘necessary’ option of evil that makes one truly free?
With this logic, the devil is good, yes? And temptation is required?
The devil’s abode is not Hell?
Adam and Eve, if Satan had not tempted them, would, essentially, not be ‘free’ in Paradise?
So, God did not cast them out of Paradise?
I’m not really sure how this follows. I was mainly responding to TK421’s comments on Aquinas. Either way evil will always be optional for any being possessing free will, other than God and those who’ve elected, with the help of grace, to completely align themselves/commune with Him, a state of being only fully consummated with the Beatific Vision. No, evil isn’t necessary but only potentially beneficial as it ultimately helps turn beings away from it, and towards the good alone.Going by this logic, then, someone who is truly free, is only free because they can do evil?
And it is the ‘necessary’ option of evil that makes one truly free?
With this logic, the devil is good, yes? And temptation is required?
The devil’s abode is not Hell?
Adam and Eve, if Satan had not tempted them, would, essentially, not be ‘free’ in Paradise?
So, God did not cast them out of Paradise?
The property which doesn’t allow us to see clearly.Confusion is an attributed effect in relation to perception as a measure of order.
Depends what you mean by darkness. Darkness in itself could be seen in relation to light from the sun. Remember, we are trying to reach a decent summary of what evil, is. What is darkness, spiritually? (think about what or who is light, spiritually).
It’s also important to recognize the limitations of this analogy:Is it possible to have good without bad ?
Doubt it , simply because you can’t have action without reaction
You can’t have a positive without a negative ,
Basic science,
Free will in a created being allows for the possibility of evil; it does not necessitate it.Going by this logic, then, someone who is truly free, is only free because they can do evil?
And it is the ‘necessary’ option of evil that makes one truly free?
With this logic, the devil is good, yes? And temptation is required?
The devil’s abode is not Hell?
Adam and Eve, if Satan had not tempted them, would, essentially, not be ‘free’ in Paradise?
So, God did not cast them out of Paradise?
Confusion is an attributed effect in relation to perception as a measure of order.
Depends what you mean by darkness. Darkness in itself could be seen in relation to light from the sun. Remember, we are trying to reach a decent summary of what evil, is. What is darkness, spiritually? (think about what or who is light, spiritually).
I think we are at a stage beyond where we were - this is better than making blanket statements.The property which doesn’t allow us to see clearly.
Huh.Yes.
So I would ask again: Is the Devil resistible or irresistible?Yes, Devil and myself
.Code:but not always
I do not agree.Think of two possible universe in which in one people always do good and in another people sometimes do evil. These are two universes and God have to power to create the one He wishes. Could we agree on this fact?
It depends what you mean by “free”. We’re talking about freedom to love and to do good.Going by this logic, then, someone who is truly free, is only free because they can do evil?
Only God has the ultimate freedom - because God has no limits. All other created things have limits on their freedom. So, nothing other than God is “truly free”. But as before, if you want to say that a rock is “free to be a rock” - then that’s fine. But we’re talking about the freedom to make a personal decision. In this case, having the possibility of an evil choice is a necessary.And it is the ‘necessary’ option of evil that makes one truly free?
Of course, the devil is a creature of God who chose evil. Anything that exists has some aspect of good – since the act of existence, of Being, is something that God gives. The Devil actually does a lot of good, in spite of himself. Many people have been converted by watching exorcisms. That is the devil being exposed – as a result, people realize the danger of evil. So, God allows the existence of the devil, to teach us many good things. The devil doesn’t like this, but he is actually used by God to do good (at times).With this logic, the devil is good, yes? And temptation is required?
Hell is a place of eternal punishment - sustained by God. That punishment is the fulfillment of Justice and Love. It is giving everyone who freely chooses evil, a place to live their decision. People who want to hate God are not forced to love Him - God respects their choices so they are free to choose to go to Hell. God respects all the creatures He created - and He loves them all.The devil’s abode is not Hell?
God reveals the freedom each person has by allowing them to be tempted. Adam and Eve would not known what it means to be free if they weren’t given the challenge of temptation. Whether they were “free” in an ultimate sense - of course, no created thing has ultimate freedom, as I explained already. We all have some freedom and some limits to that.Adam and Eve, if Satan had not tempted them, would, essentially, not be ‘free’ in Paradise?
God cast them out, necessarily, as a consequence of sin. They chose to sin, thus bringing human-evil into the world.So, God did not cast them out of Paradise?
So do those in Heaven not have freewill? Are they less free than when they were on earth and subject to temptation?Free will in a created being allows for the possibility of evil; it does not necessitate it.