B
buffalo
Guest
Be more specific. What is allowed now that was not before?The prevailing Catholic attitude towards birth control shifted heavily towards it being okay during Vatican II.
Be more specific. What is allowed now that was not before?The prevailing Catholic attitude towards birth control shifted heavily towards it being okay during Vatican II.
The death penaly is not legitimate defence. It’s retribution. Remember I mentioned it earlier?PhiriTalk:![]()
Legitimate defense is still catholic teaching.Until last year, the death penalty was not against catholic teaching.
That is an objective standard. The claim going on here is the evolution of morality is not.God literally says that killing other people isn’t okay. Really cut and dry.
What the…? A scientific theory is an explantion. Based on facts.Scientific theories are facts. You’re confusing hypothesis and theory.
Then you do not understand it. I can help:The death penaly is not legitimate defence. It’s retribution. Remember I mentioned it earlier?
This was my original point.And to my original point, things are the way they are regardless of what anyone does or does not believe. Vaccines work and are safe regardless of what anti-vaxers say. Global anthropogenic climate change is occurring and causing harm to the global biosphere regardless of what climate deniers say. LGBT people don’t choose to be who they are regardless of what homophobes say. Melanin has no affect on intelligence or proclivity for crime no matter what the racists think. Evolution occurs rega…
Whether they voted for it or not it was not changed. Popular thought and practice has nothing to do with magisterial teaching.The bishops voted in favor of allowing birth control, the Pope essentially vetoed them. The vast majority of catholics think birth control is okay nonetheless.
The death penalty serves three purposes. Preventing the accused from comitting further crimes, as a deterrent to dissuage others from doing so and as retribution.Bradskii:![]()
Then you do not understand it. I can help:The death penaly is not legitimate defence. It’s retribution. Remember I mentioned it earlier?
http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s2c2a5.htm
Specifically, it defers to the potential to save the soul from damnation. In countries that have the financial and ability to incarcerate it is preferred. This maximizes the chance for the offender to achieve salvation. A quick death does not avail that opportunity. In countries without the means the death penalty is still an option if it is the only way to protect the rest of the population.The death penalty is now not acceptable so 2267 is no longer valid.
Your claim is that the faithful have the ability to rewrite the Commandments?I never said otherwise. We’re talking about the evolving morality of catholics, not what are or are not the teachings at any particular moment in time.
The death penalty is literally a horrible deterrent though. There’s nothing good about killing somebody.Specifically, it defers to the potential to save the soul from damnation. In countries that have the financial and ability to incarcerate it is preferred. This maximizes the chance for the offender to achieve salvation. A quick death does not avail that opportunity. In countries without the means the death penalty is still an option if it is the only way to protect the rest of the population. Now this Pope has been saying things about abolishing it entirely. I am not sure where this has g…
There is a difference though between killing and murder. Are you aware of the principle of double effect?There’s nothing good about killing somebody.
That is not the Catholic way. It is the Protestant way though.Church teachings come from the flavor of the day’s interpretation of God, not from God. If the Church can stop thinking the sun goes around the earth, then it can stop thinking brith control is bad.