D
Dum_Spiro_Spero
Guest
I find it ironic in parishes that allow only males to serve…especially in exclusively Traditional Latin Mass parishes, there is an over abundance of young men/boys serving…and the number of registered families in those parishes are usually significantly smaller than the local NO Cathedral…yet they produce more vocations and more Altar Boys…that should tell you something.
Just wanted to say that I agree with this statement, especially the last sentence, especially in my parish. I attend NO Masses because I am in a rural area, and that is the only ones offered here. The priest at my parish is already stretched between two parishes, and he has a lot on his plate. My mom has served as the sacristan for a long time, and why? Because no one else has stepped up to take the job. She lines up Mass intentions for those who have died. Once a month, she and my dad (in formation to be ordained a deacon) take Communion around to the homebound. She used to handle all the decorating in the church, but thankfully we got some people to start taking that over.
So where are all the men to offer their services?
Sometimes I think people don’t want to step up is because they are afraid of being tied down to something. If they put as much work into their church as they did into their job, maybe we wouldn’t have this problem.
With that being said, I am a girl (moving off to Benedictine College as a freshman in a little over a week) and I served at Mass when I was younger (please remember that I’m in a rural area…we pretty much needed those extra servers so the guys wouldn’t be so overwhelmed). I am a mandated reader. I also played the piano for Mass. I think what I did was completely acceptable. If you don’t want female altar servers, then attend Mass where there are none. As such, I doubt any of us will change each other’s minds, and I don’t want to argue. Just my two cents.