K
kelvinf
Guest
By that, I meant something I could verify like a link to an article. Notwithstanding, I found something on CNN.You have your sources. CNN and NPR.
Right, I found something like that on CNN. Another source says this:CNN interviewed people to write an article of what they want us to believe Trayvon was before the incident. Drug use was not mentioned.
But one of the people interviewed was listed as being a “fellow football player”
That and the listing that he played football from age five indicate that he was a football player from an early age and continued to be such.
If this is in error, I suggest the source is the problem.
It was a small gathering of people from the Optimist League. Trayvon Martin played football in the league from the age five until 14.
indianapolisrecorder.com/news/national/article_4342f048-7d4a-11e1-8d00-001a4bcf887a.html
I think that was somewhat the point that the poster was making–because he played Optimist football did not mean he was a football star. But the poster really sounded like there was something more to Optimist football.It doesn’t.
Whoever attempted that argument does not know what ‘Optimist’ football is.
The best I can tell from various Optimist football web pages is that it is simply a team not affiliated with a specific school but is instead organized at a neighborhood level.
It does not characterize skill level.
And my point is that, him playing football up to age 14 as I know, does not mean he had the strength to beat Zimmerman hands down as maryjk was trying to portray.