A
AlmaRedemptorisMater
Guest
Read the next couple verses as well then
I wouldn’t call it a “moral development,” I would call it a “moral setback.”Personally, I think that society’s acceptance of gay people does represent a development in our understanding of morality since a majority of Americans probably don’t consider most of them to be depraved and immoral individuals anymore like they used to. That seems to me to be a pretty big development in most people’s moral understanding. They recognize now that gay men and lesbians just want to marry the person they love and have a happy life like most other people.
Question for you:People keep saying this, but in reality, it is not true.
How many people actually know/see what “actions” their friends are doing?
OK…How do I know?
If the person who is cheating tells me they are, yes, they would get it with both barrels. If it was something I just suspected, then no, I would keep my mouth shut.
Just to be clear, we are not to judge the state of another’s soul, but we most certainly are to judge other’s actions in a loving and caring way to help them achieve everlasting salvation (heaven), so if we see someone sinning, we are called to gently let them know. It’s why parents correct their children when they are doing something that could harm them. THAT is what love the sinner, hate the sin really means! The problem that arises, is that people do not correct others with love, they do so with pride and a sense of being better than the other person, when in fact we are all sinners.First and foremost, it is not up to us to judge others in any matter. That is left to God.
We should support our brothers and sisters in this life. Hate the sin, but love the sinner.
I would say support anyone who is being denied life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Our purpose in life here on earth is to praise and give glory to God, and to love one another as brothers and sisters.
It is our challenge to do this in all that we say and do.
Well first of all, that person should have come to YOU about their suspicions and not your husband. I’m so sorry that happened to you. That was totally wrong of them. The goal should be to make sure you are attempting to help the save the marriage, not wreck it. So that person was totally wrong.It would depend. Whobis this,person to me? Am I willing to jeopardize my friendship with them by assuming something?
I have had this happen to me. Someone saw me having dinner with a man who was not my husband. They told my husband they saw me cheating on him, laughing, carrying-on with spme other guy.
Well, that other guy was my best friend from the 1st grade. We have been friends for more than 40 years. My husband was not amused with his friend’s assumptions. They are no longer friends.
So, I would be very careful about saying anything to anyone, unless I had concrete proof of any wrong-doing.
BTW - if you are jeopardizing your friendship with a friend by asking them if they are happy in their marriage and making sure they are not thinking about cheating on their spouse; then (at least to me) they don’t sound like a good friend.Am I willing to jeopardize my friendship with them by assuming something?
I would not be that friend.Personally, I would - and if I was wrong, I would hope that we could laugh it off.
Well, I honestly think that’s one of the differences between men and women. Boys/men can literally get in a fist fight with a friend and literally draw blood, then get a ice cream / beer and laugh about it an hour later.phil19034:![]()
I would not be that friend.Personally, I would - and if I was wrong, I would hope that we could laugh it off.
In fact, I would be highly insulted if someone approached me with a suspicion like that.
I would not just “laugh it off” and my friendship with said person would never be the same.
Because love is wanting the good for the other for the other’s sake.Why would that be any of my business to bring up in a conversation?
If a friend brings something up, I will listen and give my opinion if asked. I will not bw thw one to broach the subject.
I agree. But I also don’t think Jesus would want us to ignore our intuition either. There are ways of handling situations without being “judgy” and without making a situation worse.I don’t think that Jesus meant that I should assume the worst about someone and confront them with my assumptions with absolutely no proof of any wrong-doing.
Again, that was HORRIBLE. If he honestly thought you were cheating, he should have approached you and not your husband.Yes, it is ridiculous, but that is exactly the attitude I was replying to.
Hubby and the guy were co-workers/friends for about 20 years.