E
Erikaspirit16
Guest
If you really think that, I feel sorry for you.And I think that much of their dislike was fueled by the messages from the media, entertainment, academia, and internet companies.
If you really think that, I feel sorry for you.And I think that much of their dislike was fueled by the messages from the media, entertainment, academia, and internet companies.
There are so many people. making statements, not isolated incidents… They all say about the same thing. Here is one.gam197:
What people? What state? Sources? Links?They would not allow people who were suppose to be in the room as observers check the ballots. There were affidavits online from many of these observers.
That is right. A good system should provide for accuracy in voting. It has high standard of showing 100 accuracy. The best you can say is no proof to make a difference. Reasonable doubt remains.In this forum “proof” has come to mean “absolutely 100% mathematical certainty.
I’m not aware of ANYTHING that is 100% accurate. If you have studied management statistics, as I have, you would know that any manufacturing process produces errors. The trick is to minimize them. And if you had about 1,000 votes and counted them twice and came up with a difference of 1, I’d say you were doing good. The re-count in Georgia was a good example–I’m not going to find the link–but it listed the counties where the vote for Trump was more than originally thought, and the same for Biden. It was about the same number of counties, as you would expect. There were also about ⅓ of the counties where the re-count was exactly the same. And as multiple sources have pointed out over and over, in statewide re-counts there is almost never a difference of more than a couple hundred out of millions of votes. The difference is not because of some wacky conspiracy, it’s because people–and machines–make mistakes. If you counted a million votes 100 times, I suspect you would come close to 100 different results, but all of them would be within a small range.That is right. A good system should provide for accuracy in voting. It has high standard of showing 100 accuracy. The best you can say is no proof to make a difference. Reasonable doubt remains.
The point there was that the two Republicans wanted to certify Republican districts that had BIGGER count discrepancies than Detroit (black) districts. For no reason. Except their own political partisanship. Again, lack of consistency–if you set a certain standard and it’s not met, then fine, do it over. But don’t ask only Democratic districts to do it over when you let larger errors in Republican districts slide.In Detroit 70% of precints had
count deficiencies, yet there was extreme pressure to certify from the left.
That’s because study after study has shown that there has not been such a thing in modern history as “voter fraud.” It’s an excuse to disenfranchise Black and poor voters who usually vote Democratic.In 2017 the president established a commission to study voter fraud and interference. It was met with stiff resistance and lawsuits by Democrats.
Now why would that be? Because the poorer citizens find it hard to get proper ID. A middle class person has no trouble showing a driver’s license or a passport. A poor person who doesn’t own a car doesn’t have a license or a passport. And usually they are forced to take a day off to go to some faraway office to apply for the ID–which they are probably charged for.Voter ID is vilified
This is not an example of fraud. This is an example of someone who doesn’t understand the the election procedures in the state of Michigan.There are so many people. making statements, not isolated incidents… They all say about the same thing. Here is one.
These are sweeping generalizations, which are not true in all states, mail in/absentee laws vary by state as does the party that put them there.Absentee ballot system was not implemented for covid problem. Instead democrats installed a “mail in” system apart from absentee ballot system.
OK, I watched the video. The guy certainly has an opinion, and it’s worth listening to. But he had absolutely no evidence of fraud. He was at TFC Center (formerly Cobo Hall) in Detroit. It’s in the center of downtown, near the Detroit River. I suspect that most of the workers would have been local–i.e., Black.There are so many people. making statements, not isolated incidents… They all say about the same thing. Here is one.
Thanks for watching the video. Yes, he was upset and there were literally hundreds like him that felt they could not get near the ballots that they were supposed to be checking, and that created an atmosphere of great distrust.gam197:
OK, I watched the video. The guy certainly has an opinion, and it’s worth listening to. But he had absolutely no evidence of fraud. He was at TFC Center (formerly Cobo Hall) in Detroit. It’s in the center of downtown, near the Detroit River. I suspect that most of the workers would have been local–i.e., Black.There are so many people. making statements, not isolated incidents… They all say about the same thing. Here is one.
I don’t think so. Mafia assistance to the Kennedy family is well documented. And it is also well documented that Robert Kennedy went after the Mafia and James Hoffa. Further documented is an alliance between the mafia and the cia to overthrow Castro.Alleged. Again…“It’s possible that…” No proof. Just idle speculation.
This is where you are wrong.Yes, he was upset and there were literally hundreds like him that felt they could not get near the ballots that they were supposed to be checking,
Not necessary. I’m not stupid, and neither is my family.If you really think that, I feel sorry for you.
So you heard him speak in person, without any media or internet or entertainment or academia “filters”?Or the words that came out of his own mouth for four years. Don’t need media— he is a walking advertisement to vote for anyone other than him.
Read the article about the difference and it seems poll watchers do very little but that is direct questioning of the valid ballot.gam197:
This is where you are wrong.Yes, he was upset and there were literally hundreds like him that felt they could not get near the ballots that they were supposed to be checking,
There is a difference between a poll challenger and a poll watcher. Although this person uses the term interchangeably.
There are students who have scored 100% on multiple choice tests.I’m not aware of ANYTHING that is 100% accurate
I stand corrected!There are students who have scored 100% on multiple choice tests.
Uh, hello, all his rallies are on You Tube. He released the unedited interview with Leslie Stahl. He loves to hear himself talk so much he has thousands of hours of stuff online and his tweets speak for themselves.So you heard him speak in person, without any media or internet or entertainment or academia “filters”?
No. I don’t care for what he says OR does.And you still didn’t care for what he said?
That is not what a poll watcher does.If the ballot counter says it is a Biden ballot and it is not, the poll watchers are required to correct it. How can they do that if they cannot see them.?
To each his/her own. Hope it works out for the country. I fear for all of us. I would love to be wrong, but…I just can’t get past the pro-abortion policies and the liberal policies about so many issues that I think are better dealt with using conservative policies.No. I don’t care for what he says OR does.